Bridgecrew vs Trellix Cloud Workload Security comparison

Palo Alto Networks and Trellix are both solutions in the Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) category. Palo Alto Networks is ranked #28, while Trellix is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.3. Palo Alto Networks holds a 0.7% mindshare in CWPP, compared to Trellix’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Palo Alto Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Trellix Cloud Workload Security and Bridgecrew compete in cloud security, especially in aspects like user satisfaction, features, deployment, and pricing. Bridgecrew is seen as having a superior feature offering despite its higher cost, whereas Trellix is favored for its affordability and support.

Features: Trellix Cloud Workload Security is known for threat detection, workload protection, and security management capabilities. Bridgecrew stands out for its integration with CI/CD pipelines, automation of infrastructure security, and extensive security policy management.

Room for Improvement: Trellix Cloud Workload Security users seek better documentation, more flexible integration options, and enhanced usability. Bridgecrew users focus on improving its learning curve, offering more customization possibilities, and quickening the user onboarding process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix Cloud Workload Security provides a straightforward deployment model, although users suggest quicker customer support. Bridgecrew is regarded for its easy setup and reliable customer service, which boosts satisfaction with deployment experiences.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix Cloud Workload Security is praised for being cost-effective, with a favorable ROI. Bridgecrew's higher pricing is justified by its advanced security automation and robust features, providing significant long-term returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Bridgecrew vs. Trellix Cloud Workload Security Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Bridgecrew vs. Trellix Cloud Workload Security

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qualys TotalCloud

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) category, the mindshare of Qualys TotalCloud is 1.7%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bridgecrew is 0.7%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Cloud Workload Security is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qualys TotalCloud	1.7%
Trellix Cloud Workload Security	0.7%
Bridgecrew	0.7%
Other	96.9%

Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)

Featured Reviews

Robert Orłowski

IT Security Expert at Alior Bank S.A.

Unified risk scoring has improved our cloud visibility and simplifies remediation priorities

Qualys TotalCloud provides unified vulnerability and threat assessment across both IAS and SaaS. This solution provides a single prioritized view of risk, which helps reduce the work I would have to do. We are no longer based on CVSS; we are based on Qualys risk scoring, which is based on CVSS plus internal findings made by Qualys, and then assigns its own score. The TruRisk insight feature has found a small number of assets with high vulnerability scores, though I am cautious since some information is classified. Qualys TotalCloud has positively impacted our bank's performance, and we have definitely seen benefits after implementing this solution.

Read full review

DanielSieradski

DevOps Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Multi-cloud, good scanning, and offers extensive guides

The challenge is that they charge you per resource. We had an issue where Google Cloud was generating secrets for our application configurations by the hundreds, which we would be charged by Bridgecloud. Our price would have surged to an insane amount due to the automatically generated secrets that we don't even use for anything, which isn't part of our security concern. What we would like to know is if there is a way that we could exclude those from our resources so that we're not billed for that. We don't monitor that. They ignored me for a month through four emails asking about that. They were just totally unresponsive. Then after a month, I said, "I guess you don't want our business." And they responded, "Oh, we're sorry to hear that." I'd say "You're sorry to hear that? Why didn't you respond to any of my emails?" If you're trying to pay them less money, then they want to get rid of you. They don't want to talk to you. That's what it came across as. It's not like we weren't looking at spending thousands of dollars a month with them. We just weren't looking at spending $8,000 versus $2,000. That was a bit frustrating. Generally, I do like their product. It's a useful product. It's good. We wanted to use it. However, since they blew us off, it left a bad taste in our mouths. Their sales team needs a little bit of a jostle to get themselves together. We'd like to see better monitoring and the ability to deny certain resources from being scanned.

Read full review

Krishnakumar Mahadevan

CISO at Spink Solutions Private Limited

Centralized visibility has improved cloud posture management and automated threat response

The disadvantages of Trellix Cloud Workload Security include some global aspects where minor improvements could be done. When doing pairwise comparisons between products on the same topic, such as posture management and how it is managed in Palo Alto, Check Point, Symantec, and Trellix, certain gaps emerge. One key limitation is that Trellix Cloud Workload Security will not provide support for China and Russia based cloud vendors. If a customer is an enterprise or global enterprise customer, this product cannot be suggested because the company does not deal with China's cloud providers. China has very good cloud options such as Alibaba Cloud and Tencent, and Trellix Cloud Workload Security does not support these platforms. Another limitation is related to CNAPP capabilities. In comparison with other CNAPP vendors, Trellix Cloud Workload Security has some drawbacks. The product does not provide full-fledged CNAPP like others do. It provides only top-level or top-layer information and lacks in-depth CNAPP capabilities, which is a key limitation. Regarding SIEM functionality, Trellix Cloud Workload Security has a native SIEM component, but it appears to be using a third-party SIEM functionality. The company is not providing their own SIEM tools but rather receiving a third-party tool and managing it. This is a disadvantage because the integration will not be as perfect as it would be with a native solution. The SIEM tool integration presents a problem. Pricing is another significant disadvantage, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises. SMEs will likely not choose Trellix Cloud Workload Security because it is very expensive. The product is not prominent in the Gartner market share rankings, and the numbers are very small. Trellix Cloud Workload Security is not competing with market leaders such as SentinelOne, which has a 5% market share. The company claims CWPP, which stands for Cloud Workload Platform Protection, but the market share is very small. The reason market share is less is because service-oriented companies with service-oriented mindsets look at who is providing the best services. They consult Gartner reports or Forrester reports, and if Trellix Cloud Workload Security is not present in those reports, they may not suggest this product to customers. Additionally, the product is expensive for SMEs, although enterprise customers can afford it. The minimum 25 user bundle requirement means licensing is sold in basic tiers of 25 users at a time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Qualys TotalCloud's most valuable feature is its ability to link clusters of assets, providing a clear model of deployments, vulnerabilities, and statuses."

"If I had to say something positive about the product that brings me the biggest benefit, I would say it has accurate reports, gets new update CVEs, zero-day attack detection, and is easy to manage with its GUI."

"Qualys TotalCloud has significantly improved our organization by automating our reporting processes, reducing the time spent on report creation from two hours to less than fifteen to twenty minutes."

"Qualys TotalCloud's most valuable features are its cloud security posture management, Kubernetes, and container security capabilities."

"The biggest strengths of Qualys TotalCloud are that it is pretty good at cloud visibility, has easy integration, and also has multi-cloud compatibility."

"I appreciate TotalCloud's real-time protection and remediation features. The remediation options include automated one-click remedies and custom changes that help manage vulnerabilities efficiently."

"Qualys TotalCloud has positively impacted our organization by helping us save time and manage all assets and remediation, allowing us to achieve quarterly and half-yearly goals."

"It is a cloud-native app that integrates with both IaaS and SaaS. It seamlessly integrates with other platforms."

More Qualys TotalCloud pros

"The software itself is good software and does great things."

"In cases where they have automatic remediations, you can click a button and it'll just fix the configuration for you."

"With any Palo Alto product that they put out, they typically have a very extensive amount of documentation behind it, and their technical account management team is almost unrivaled."

"New users don't have too many problems with the product. They have a lot of training documentation around it."

"The discovery feature is the most valuable. After you integrate your cloud environment, maybe an Azure or AWS, or a private environment hosted on VMware, it automatically starts discovering the number of servers that are running on that cloud and the number of services that you have done. It is a beautiful feature because, from a security standpoint, it is difficult to identify which VM is compliant or not when you keep on provisioning a number of VMs in the cloud. It also checks for compliance. It checks whether a system is compliant and whether antivirus is installed on a VM. If an antivirus is installed, it checks whether the antivirus is updated to the latest signature package or not. All these things are beautifully done by McAfee Cloud Workload Security. For communicating with the McAfee server, you need to install an agent on the VM. McAfee Cloud Workload Security gives you a direct opportunity to install an agent on a Windows machine. If you have a Windows cloud, you can directly push that agent onto the VM through your McAfee portal. It provides you a single dashboard view of all servers present in the cloud. It shows the servers on which the antivirus is already installed as well as the servers for which the antivirus installation is still pending. This dashboard view is a much-needed thing. It also has a centralized management, which makes it easy to use."

"Trellix Cloud Workload Security has positively impacted my organization by providing prominent visibility concerning detection, threat, risk, and vulnerabilities across the cloud environment, helping us to be proactive in risk mitigation before any disaster happens."

"In my opinion, it is easy to manage with our ePolicy Orchestrator, the policies, and everything, making it a one-stop access and dashboard to everything, which makes their life easier to maintain."

"Trellix Cloud Workload Security has positively impacted my organization because it has strengthened cloud security control, improved workload visibility, and reduced risk."

"The installation process of Trellix Cloud Workload Security is very easy because the ePolicy Orchestrator is integrated."

"We have seen great outcomes with Trellix Cloud Workload Security, such as a clear drop in the time it takes to spot and deal with security issues in our cloud environment since we started using this product, so overall it is saving our time and having a positive impact."

"The intuitive dashboard does not cause any time loss."

"Trellix Cloud Workload Security has positively impacted our organization by improving our visibility across cloud and infrastructure, showing how many workloads we have and what is occurring with those workloads."

More Trellix Cloud Workload Security pros

Cons

"I sometimes have difficulty detecting or uninstalling certain versions of applications, which I have to do manually."

"In my opinion, what can be improved in Qualys TotalCloud includes pricing and container scanning."

"The support process is inefficient due to the excessive number of replies required when submitting tickets."

"With the growing integration of AI, I would like Qualys to enhance its service offerings to better accommodate AI-related risks."

"It is already perfect, but they can bring some newer dashboards and customization options for the dashboard. It would be great to be able to include on-prem assets on the dashboard."

"Qualys' customer service provides quality answers, but the response time is long, even though it is within the SLA."

"I would like the ability to disable certain default built-in policies as they can be misleading when creating dashboards. That is the top one."

"There should be improvement from a dashboard perspective when collecting and showcasing data to lead management."

More Qualys TotalCloud cons

"The biggest issue that I see companies run into is that they immediately think that, "Oh, this solution will be right, simply due to the name." But that's the same issue Splunk runs into. People will immediately jump to Splunk being the best SIEM tool, just because they're the largest. When in reality, QRadar, LogRhythm, and all these other ones are performing similar functions and would actually fit better in some people's environments. Therefore, it's important a company does its homework and does not assume one size fits all."

"We'd like to see better monitoring and the ability to deny certain resources from being scanned."

"Before the Palo Alto acquisition, BridgeCrew had a reputation of them not being the best, however, since having that additional support from Palo Alto, I haven't heard of any issues."

"However, since they blew us off, it left a bad taste in our mouths."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing model."

"Its vulnerability assessment is not the best. We cannot identify the vulnerabilities that are related to the operating system by using McAfee Cloud Workload Security. I wish McAfee would add a vulnerability assessment tool that will not only identify the vulnerability but will also be able to generate a report so that the required patching can be done for the servers. Currently, McAfee Cloud Workload Security only integrates with AWS and Azure. If it can also integrate with GCP, Alibaba, and other cloud services available in the market, it would be good because not all people are using Azure and AWS."

"Its vulnerability assessment is not the best. We cannot identify the vulnerabilities that are related to the operating system by using McAfee Cloud Workload Security."

"I think with the cloud AWS, there could be some improvements for Trellix Cloud Workload Security."

"I think Trellix Cloud Workload Security could improve by simplifying the initial deployment, as the initial setup requires an expert level of knowledge to deploy it."

"The time to detect or resolve is a concern, and I am not fully satisfied with that aspect."

"The first is the limited CNAPP capabilities compared to other security solutions like Aqua and Wiz, as Trellix Cloud Workload Security lacks full CNAPP depth, with limited coverage such as CSPM, infrastructure as code scanning, and deep container security."

"We experience limited customer support, typically requiring a minimum wait of three to four hours for ticket responses."

More Trellix Cloud Workload Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Although Qualys TotalCloud is relatively expensive due to its unique automation features, its cost-effectiveness is rated an eight out of ten, with ten being the most costly."

"Qualys TotalCloud is expensive."

"It isn't cheap, but it's reasonable. It helps us to manage things with very few resources."

"I am not sure about the pricing. From what I understand, it is a bit on the higher side, but I do not have the exact numbers."

"Qualys TotalCloud is cost-efficient and was selected for its value compared to other products."

"Its price seems higher compared to other tools, but it is worth it. If they could adjust the pricing and make it comparable with other tools, that would be great."

"The pricing for TotalCloud is attractive and competitive in the market. Given the features, especially the dashboard, I have no concerns regarding pricing."

"Qualys TotalCloud offers competitive pricing given its comprehensive suite of features, including integration, assessment, remediation, and detection capabilities, all within a single platform."

More Qualys TotalCloud pricing and cost advice

Information not available

"It is not an expensive product. I am in the Indian market, and it is one of the most reliable and cost-effective solutions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Performing Arts

24%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

23%

Healthcare Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	31

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys TotalCloud?

The price is very expensive, actually.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys TotalCloud?

To be totally honest, I do not have any best features because I have had a bad experience using this tool, especially...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qualys TotalCloud?

My main use case for Qualys TotalCloud is vulnerability management and exposure management. I use this tool to evalua...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Cloud Workload Security?

We probably purchased it through AWS Marketplace, and we did. I think the licensing costs for Trellix Cloud Workload ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee Cloud Workload Security?

The disadvantages of Trellix Cloud Workload Security include some global aspects where minor improvements could be do...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering McAfee Cloud Workload Security?

Trellix Cloud Workload Security is scalable. My overall review rating for this product is 8.

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 8% of the time

JupiterOne vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 6% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 6% of the time

AWS Security Hub vs Qualys TotalCloud

Compared 5% of the time

More Qualys TotalCloud Competitors

Orca Security vs Bridgecrew

Compared 30% of the time

FortiCNAPP vs Bridgecrew

Compared 29% of the time

BMC Helix Cloud Security vs Bridgecrew

Compared 28% of the time

CloudPassage vs Bridgecrew

Compared 5% of the time

Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security) vs Bridgecrew

Compared 4% of the time

More Bridgecrew Competitors

TrendAI Vision One – Cloud Security vs Trellix Cloud Workload Security

Compared 38% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Trellix Cloud Workload Security

Compared 27% of the time

Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security) vs Trellix Cloud Workload Security

Compared 9% of the time

AWS GuardDuty vs Trellix Cloud Workload Security

Compared 8% of the time

FortiCNAPP vs Trellix Cloud Workload Security

Compared 8% of the time

More Trellix Cloud Workload Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qualys TotalCloud

August 2026

Download Qualys TotalCloud product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)

August 2026

Download Bridgecrew product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Cloud Workload Security

July 2026

Download Trellix Cloud Workload Security product report

Also Known As

Qualys TotalCloud with FlexScan

No data available

McAfee Cloud Workload Security

Overview

Qualys TotalCloud enhances security posture across cloud environments with continuous monitoring, vulnerability management, and risk visualization, ensuring efficient threat assessment and automated remediation for improved cyber risk reduction.

Qualys TotalCloud offers a robust suite of security tools essential for organizations managing multi-cloud infrastructures. By integrating cloud accounts and automating workflows, it supports AWS, Azure, and GCP, offering comprehensive vulnerability management and zero-day detection. The platform's user-friendly design, combined with its extensive risk management and unified threat assessment capabilities, enables organizations to prioritize and remediate vulnerabilities effectively. TruRisk Insights provides clear insights on cyber risks, while the automation options streamline patch management and scanning processes. API integration across IaaS and SaaS environments further enhances resource allocation efficiency and saves time, addressing misconfigurations across cloud environments.

What are the most important features of Qualys TotalCloud?

Accurate Vulnerability Reports: Delivers precise and actionable insights for risk mitigation.
Zero-Day Detection: Identifies and addresses zero-day vulnerabilities proactively.
Unified Threat Assessment: Offers comprehensive evaluation of threats across the environment.
Extensive Risk Management: Manages risks effectively with advanced insights and prioritization.
Continuous Monitoring: Provides non-stop surveillance for vulnerabilities and threats.
Cloud-Native Automation: Streamlines processes and reduces manual efforts using automation.
FlexScan for Internet-Facing VMs: Scans external VMs efficiently to detect vulnerabilities.
Dashboard Risk Visualization: Clear visualization helps prioritize vulnerabilities.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Improved Security Posture: Enhances threat detection and response across clouds.
Time Savings: Automation reduces time spent on manual vulnerability management.
Resource Efficiency: Better allocation of resources through streamlined workflows.
Enhanced Risk Prioritization: Focus on critical vulnerabilities for effective mitigation.
Integrated Cloud Accounts: Facilitates seamless cloud management and security.

Qualys TotalCloud is deployed in sectors needing rigorous vulnerability management, such as finance and healthcare. Companies utilize it to secure multi-cloud environments like AWS, Azure, and GCP, focus on compliance, and integrate security into CI/CD pipelines to detect and remedy threats pre-deployment.

Qualys

Bridgecrew enhances cloud security by automating infrastructure monitoring and policy enforcement. It's designed to integrate with development workflows, providing developers with security feedback.

Bridgecrew is an infrastructure-as-code solution focused on cloud-native security. It offers automated policy checks for infrastructures managed through platforms like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. Users benefit from its seamless integration into CI/CD pipelines, allowing for early identification of potential security misconfigurations. It also supports scalable compliance management, enabling companies to meet industry standards efficiently.

What are Bridgecrew's most important features?

Automatic Policy Enforcement: Streamlines compliance by implementing predefined policies.
Integration with CI/CD: Embeds security into the development lifecycle.
Cloud Infrastructure Mapping: Provides visibility into cloud environments.
Policy as Code: Customizable checks tailored to organizational policies.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Adapts to growing infrastructure needs.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces manual security effort.
Cost Savings: Cuts down on security breaches and compliance violations.
Time to Remediation: Accelerates fixing vulnerabilities.

Bridgecrew is frequently implemented in tech and financial sectors where cloud security is a priority. Its adaptability allows for easy integration with existing tools, providing continuous monitoring and compliance, making it suitable for fast-paced industries.

Palo Alto Networks

Trellix Cloud Workload Security offers an advanced scalable and adaptable platform designed to secure cloud environments. It addresses cybersecurity challenges while providing seamless integration and robust protection for cloud-based applications and infrastructure.

Designed for organizations requiring efficient cloud security, Trellix Cloud Workload Security integrates advanced threat detection and protection mechanisms to ensure continuous monitoring and instant threat responses. It leverages cutting-edge technology to safeguard data integrity and maintain operational efficiency, offering a seamless experience that aligns with contemporary cloud security requirements.

What are the key features?

Continuous Threat Monitoring: Delivers real-time alerts and enhances threat detection capabilities.
Scalable Architecture: Easily adapts to changes, meeting diverse business demands.
Compliance Assurance: Aligns with industry standards to mitigate compliance risks.
Seamless Integration: Smoothly aligns with cloud services to enhance security measures.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Enhanced Security: Ensures peace of mind with comprehensive threat protection.
Operational Efficiency: Optimizes resources, reducing overhead costs.
Improved Compliance: Reduces the risk of regulatory penalties.
Scalability: Allows businesses to grow securely without compromising performance.

In industries like financial services and healthcare, Trellix Cloud Workload Security is implemented to protect sensitive data and manage compliance requirements effectively. Its flexible architecture and robust security features allow it to adapt to these industries' demanding environments, offering reliable protection and integration while supporting specific industry regulations.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Rapyd, BetterHelp, Brex, People.ai, Globality

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Bridgecrew vs. Trellix Cloud Workload Security

August 2026

Free Report: Bridgecrew vs. Trellix Cloud Workload Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Bridgecrew vs. Trellix Cloud Workload Security and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bridgecrew vs. Trellix Cloud Workload Security report.

See our list of best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.