No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Brevo vs SendGrid comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Brevo
Ranking in Cloud Email
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SendGrid
Ranking in Cloud Email
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Cloud Email category, the mindshare of Brevo is 5.2%, up from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SendGrid is 8.2%, down from 19.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Email Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
SendGrid8.2%
Brevo5.2%
Other86.6%
Cloud Email
 

Featured Reviews

it_user242526 - PeerSpot reviewer
Web/Webmarketing project manager at a recruiting/HR firm with 51-200 employees
The filters could be more efficient but the reports are clear and precise.
The filters could be more efficient. For example, when I send a campaign, I usually send it again seven days later. Sometimes, I update the database of emails in-between these mailings, and therefore, I have to re-enter all the filters of the first mailing, and it can take a very long time depending of the campaign.
Amrit Dash - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation Engineer at a educational organization with 11-50 employees
Dynamic templates have streamlined student and parent email campaigns and build consistent engagement
The activity log is a little slower at times, but that is probably just nitpicking an issue. Overall, in general, there are not really very difficult pain points. There are certain issues sometimes when we are trying to handle a very big campaign; we might end up having a little bit less reputation in terms of bounces or spam reports that get detected when we send out the emails. Apart from that, there is not anything that would become a significant pain point. If you don't really have an advanced subscription for SendGrid, it might take a while for you to reach the customer support.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Most of the time, the reports show that SendinBlue is really efficient."
"It is a stable and scalable solution."
"Since switching to SendGrid, I have seen that time is saved, and the trust of the portals like Gmail and Outlook ensures the emails are received quickly with minimum failure, which increases the business."
"White-listed mail which avoids spam on mail services like Gmail and Yahoo."
"They have pretty good support in terms of any issues."
"Overall, it provides a good return on investment through reliability, time savings, and improved communication."
"The solution scales well."
"SendGrid is a most powerful third-party tool to use for email sending, and it improves the delivery rates compared to other services."
"They enable us to automate all the communication with our clients around commercial campaigns, marketing activities, and also during transactional tasks, basically, any transaction that happens on the account."
 

Cons

"The filters could be more efficient."
"If you don't really have an advanced subscription for SendGrid, it might take a while for you to reach the customer support."
"The biggest problem that we have faced is with the authentication during login."
"SendGrid could improve pricing flexibility and offer more detailed analytics without extra cost."
"SendGrid is already nice, but it could be improved by providing the company ID when sending the email."
"A long time ago, I may have had an issue, and I had to wait for support, which wasn't that helpful. However, that was a very long time ago. Overall, I've had a good experience."
"Pricing can be improved for SendGrid, as this is the only area I have seen that needs enhancement."
"For my use case, SendGrid is very good. The cost could potentially be improved, though I am not very familiar with pricing details."
"They are very bad at supporting clients."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The basic plan starts at €90 per month."
"Its cost can vary. It can go as low as $10 or $15 to $1,000 depending on how much you use it."
"We are using the Advanced plan,10K. That is about $100 per month but sometimes we do go over the limit of the plan."
"I use the essential plan which is $20 a month. After that, we use the pro which is $90 a month, and had all our costs bundled in."
"The solution is relatively inexpensive."
"My company pays for SendGrid monthly, and though I cannot share the amount, my feedback is that the vendor should accept other modes of payment apart from a credit card."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Email solutions are best for your needs.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
19%
Construction Company
12%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SendGrid?
My advice is not to buy SendGrid; instead, use alternatives.
What needs improvement with SendGrid?
They should take care of their customers more carefully.
What is your primary use case for SendGrid?
I use the solution to send transactional and promotional emails.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Choose Crazy Egg, Dispop, CmonSite, Unbounce, Ambassador, AdRoll
ScoutMob
Find out what your peers are saying about Twilio, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Intuit and others in Cloud Email. Updated: August 2026.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.