Box - Intelligent Content Management vs Kiteworks comparison

Box - Intelligent Content M...

Read 13 Kiteworks reviews

5,974 Views
1,075 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 12, 2026

Kiteworks and Box - Intelligent Content Management are competing products in secure content management. Box has the upper hand due to its extensive collaboration features, despite Kiteworks' strong data protection focus.

Features: Kiteworks offers secure file sharing, encryption, and two-factor authentication, making it ideal for data protection-focused organizations. Box provides robust collaboration tools, third-party integrations, and device-agnostic cloud storage, appealing to businesses requiring versatile content management options.

Room for Improvement: Kiteworks could enhance integration capabilities and expand its collaboration tools for a broader appeal. Improving user interface and access control settings is also recommended. Box can benefit from more cost-effective pricing models and streamlined setup processes to reduce initial adjustment periods.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kiteworks offers a straightforward deployment process with dedicated customer support, ensuring a smooth implementation. Box provides an accessible deployment model with responsive customer service, although fully leveraging its features might require initial adjustment efforts.

Pricing and ROI: Kiteworks generally has lower initial setup costs, which are attractive for security-driven efficiencies. Box, while potentially costlier upfront, offers strong ROI through its feature-rich capabilities that enhance productivity and drive long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Box - Intelligent Content Management vs. Kiteworks Report (Updated: September 2026).

Box - Intelligent Content Management vs. Kiteworks

Download the complete report

Helped 914,322 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Box - Intelligent Content M...

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

9th

Ranking in Content Collaboration Platforms

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Storage (10th), Digital Asset Management (3rd), Document Management Software (3rd)

Kiteworks

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

16th

Ranking in Content Collaboration Platforms

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Email Security (27th), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (7th), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Box - Intelligent Content Management is 4.1%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiteworks is 1.4%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Content Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Box - Intelligent Content Management	4.1%
Kiteworks	1.4%
Other	94.5%

Enterprise Content Management

Featured Reviews

Jeremey Kenney

Manager, Technology & Integration at GlobalMac IT

Secure file governance has improved collaboration and automation for client document workflows

The best features are around security, being able to set up different groups, and the governance features are really great. The new AI functionality that they released has been pretty handy. For governance and security, the audit trail capability is excellent. We are able to see when people interact or change files or if something was deleted, and we can go through and review that audit trail. The AI has been great for creating different workflows that we are able to execute. When a form gets submitted into Box - Intelligent Content Management or a file is uploaded, there are certain automations that we can put in place to where it can essentially generate tickets in our system for new users or other tasks.

Read full review

KishoreT-Review

Associate Consultant at a tech consulting company with 10,001+ employees

Streamlined global file sharing with user-friendly interface and self-service capabilities

I'm not a network expert, however, there must be some room for improvement. Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss. If users receive such notifications, they can understand any disruptions are due to issues with their network or bandwidth rather than the site or Kiteworks. Additionally, I work from offshore India, and I told my client manager to communicate with the Kiteworks forum salesman regarding one feature. I noticed the Kiteworks login UI is very basic, lacking customization. Allowing more HTML tags to add hyperlinks or user-friendly information on the home page would be very useful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Simple file sharing and sync for internal and external customers."

"With us being an all Mac managed service provider, we find that the integration Box - Intelligent Content Management has with Finder is really good with the syncing, and it is probably one of the better file-sharing solutions when it comes to that, which is the big reason why we suggest it out to our clients."

"It is a very user-friendly product."

"You can upload your bin, upload your files quickly, and download your files quickly, and you can use it on your own, on an iPad, or on your mobile phones whenever you wish to."

"For basic file storage and a little collaboration, the product is fine."

"Box thinks of features before I realize I want them!"

"We use Box as a cloud-based storage service for our employees to share documents, such as presentations, between people, and some of our customers have many gigabytes in files and we set up shared access to them using Box."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the set of security options that can be set when sharing files with a group."

More Box - Intelligent Content Management pros

"I can identify from which region our users are uploading or downloading files."

"We could see whether the customer with whom we shared a file had downloaded it, which was not available with GitHub."

"The solution can be used remotely, including from mobiles, and it's easy to upload and share files."

"The best part of this solution is that we can generate multiple reports about how the data is transferred and about user information or IP."

"It’s a great product that you should seriously consider and take the first step by training."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to allow end-users to manage their own information and data with minimal administration. That's the best feature from my perspective."

"Kiteworks is easy to manage and maintain with a user-friendly interface and I recommend it to anyone that requires a file-sharing system that supports SFTP."

"The most useful feature of this solution is to share files with external parties and we can use this functionality to share files internally too."

More Kiteworks pros

Cons

"The solution's data security should be improved."

"I wish the search was faster, like a google search."

"The UI should be faster. Sometimes it lags when switching between documents."

"If you want to delete something in Box, you have to do it manually, one by one. That was my recent experience. They might have a bulk delete, but I could not find that option. If you want to delete something, you have to go to each and every file and delete it."

"I find their API to be quite complex and it could be more straightforward."

"If you want to delete something in Box, you have to do it manually, one by one."

"The waterfall methodology for folders does not allow for privatization of folders at the root level, which sometimes may be necessary."

"Search function remove layers."

More Box - Intelligent Content Management cons

"It could be more stable. In the next release, it would be better if it was more stable with improved performance."

"There are always issues when there are bugs or upgrades. The challenge with upgrading is getting more storage from the customer. Every time we have a new version, it requires additional storage. This means that the customer would need to procure more storage for their server, which they don't like because it means additional cost to them. So, I think my request would be that the version upgrades don't require any significant storage requirement."

"Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss."

"The one feature, which I have also requested directly to Kiteworks, is to have a scheduled upgrade function. Currently, one of my engineers logs in after hours for the upgrade. We're a hospital, and we're 24/7, but the primary users are seven to five. So, we log in the early evening just to push a button to tell it to do the update. It would be nice if that could be very easily scheduled."

"Kiteworks could benefit from enhancing the proposal knowledge base section, specifically regarding the type of work involved. Currently, the knowledge base seems insufficiently dedicated to this topic, making it challenging for new users to access the relevant administrative law. Improving the visual aids and providing clearer explanations could alleviate this issue."

"File location could be improved."

"We have experienced a few hiccups and bugs when using the admin console and from a user perspective."

"The system is extremely stable, but because it is a "COTS" system access is restricted and you must use the solution's support to make even simple changes, which increases the downtime."

More Kiteworks cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My organization pays for the license."

"We are using the free version of the solution. There is a free version and monthly and yearly subscriptions available."

"Our pricing and licensing is excellent. I'd tell all Higher Ed customers to talk with Internet2 for excellent pricing and support."

"Box needs to improve with their pricing in terms of licensing costs."

"A business account has a minimum of three users. If you are more than three people in-house, go for the Enterprise version. All the external users are free of charge."

"Box's pricing is excellent."

"Better sign a full year's contract to get a discount."

"I have to pay for Box. It could be a little cheaper. On a scale from one to ten, I would give the pricing a five."

More Box - Intelligent Content Management pricing and cost advice

"The license management is changing and confusing. If I could make one change to it, it would be better license management through the API."

"The solution is very expensive because we are buying with Malaysian Ringgit and it's sold in US dollars."

"They changed it midstream. We were being charged a certain flat rate for SFTP traffic. For whatever reason, at the beginning of the year, our pricing changed, and we are now being charged more for using a feature of the product than we were when we first bought it. That has been our experience with billing. It turned out to be more expensive than when we started with it."

"The price of Kiteworks is reasonable."

"I believe it's a little costly, but given the faith that we put into it from a security perspective to maintain the integrity of our patient information that is being transferred through this system, that's a small price to pay. So, on the surface, it might look like a lot of money, but depending on the need for security, which is where we feel it shines, it's okay price-wise."

"It is not really expensive. I mean, to me it's obviously expensive, but it's worth it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	32

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Box?

Box - Intelligent Content Management has fairly good pricing for licenses, especially if you do an annual plan. We always suggest our clients do a month-to-month plan so that they have flexibility ...

What needs improvement with Box?

I would suggest more out-of-the-box integrations as far as the automations go. Box - Intelligent Content Management has many templates, and you can customize some things, but there appear to be som...

What is your primary use case for Box?

Box - Intelligent Content Management is used for file storage for clients and provides a secure way to share files with other people as well as internally with our team. Box - Intelligent Content M...

What is Kiteworks?

Kiteworks is a secured file sharing platform that enables users to collaborate with different parties across a robust offering of secured protected channels. Users have the option of virtual privat...

What needs improvement with Kiteworks?

What advice do you have for others considering Kiteworks?

Scalability is impressive. It can be highly available, resilient, and scalable infrastructure. I can confidently give it a nine. It suits any level of organization, whether a small setup with two a...

SharePoint vs Box - Intelligent Content Management

Comparisons

Compared 6% of the time

Dropbox Business - Enterprise vs Box - Intelligent Content Management

Compared 4% of the time

ShareFile vs Box - Intelligent Content Management

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft OneDrive for Business vs Box - Intelligent Content Management

Compared 4% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Box - Intelligent Content Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Box - Intelligent Content Management Competitors

SharePoint vs Kiteworks

Compared 6% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs Kiteworks

Compared 5% of the time

Hygraph vs Kiteworks

Compared 5% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Kiteworks

Compared 5% of the time

Control-M vs Kiteworks

Compared 3% of the time

More Kiteworks Competitors

Product Reports

Box - Intelligent Content Management

Download Box - Intelligent Content Management product report

Box - Intelligent Content Management report

Download Kiteworks product report

Also Known As

No data available

Accellion

Overview

Box offers seamless integration with third-party apps, strong collaboration tools, and secure content distribution to enhance productivity across devices.

Box is a powerful platform for file storage and collaboration, known for its security, ease of use, and advanced integration options. Supporting seamless synchronization and real-time editing, Box facilitates effective teamwork and secure sharing of content both internally and externally. Though it faces challenges such as folder-level security and collaboration speed, Box remains a preferred choice for enterprises seeking efficient document management and secure file transfers. Its robust feature set, including metadata management and customizable permissions, supports remote work and facilitates easy access to stored documents and workflows.

What are the key features of Box?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface across all devices for efficient file management and collaboration.
Collaboration Tools: Real-time editing and robust tools to enhance teamwork.
Security Options: Strong encryption and customizable permissions to protect content.
Third-party Integration: Seamless integration with apps like Microsoft Office.
File Sharing: Efficient sharing capabilities for both internal and external stakeholders.
Metadata Management: Advanced options for organizing and managing content.

Why do users appreciate using Box?

Productivity Boost: Reduces time and effort needed for document access and collaboration.
Secure Environment: Ensures data safety through strong security measures.
Improved Workflow: Facilitates smoother operations and collaboration across teams.
Mobility: Supports remote work with easy access to files on the move.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and legal, Box is employed for secure document storage and sharing, ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements. Teams leverage its features for secure project collaboration, e-signatures, and handling large files, making it invaluable in sectors requiring strict data management protocols.

Box

Kiteworks provides secure enterprise file sharing with mobile access and collaboration tools, supporting up to 100 GB transfers. It ensures data safety with encryption and offers a smooth interface for independent data management.

Kiteworks is tailored for effective large-scale data transfers using SFTP, email, and web. It supports two-factor authentication, antivirus scanning, and seamless integration with SSO to minimize administrative tasks. Users benefit from a centralized platform that offers visibility and control over data exchanges, receiving activity notifications and managing encryption keys independently. Despite its strengths, technical support and interface stability need improvement, along with the introduction of automated LDAP syncing and expanded knowledge resources.

What features make Kiteworks stand out?

Mobile Access: Facilitates secure data handling on-the-go.
Enterprise File Sharing: Enables large file transfers with up to 100 GB limit.
Collaboration Tools: Streamlines team efforts and file sharing.
Enhanced Security: Includes two-factor authentication and antivirus scanning.
SSO Integration: Reduces administrative tasks for efficient user management.

What ROI benefits should users seek in reviews?

Data Security: High level of encryption ensures sensitive data protection.
Efficient Management: Independent data handling and activity alerts improve workflow.
Administrative Ease: SSO and centralized logs simplify oversight and reduce complexity.

Organizations in sectors like healthcare and finance utilize Kiteworks to securely share and transfer sensitive data, from medical records to credit card information, ensuring compliance and data integrity. Industries benefit from its automated data transfer and secure communication capabilities, critical for operations ranging from air quality monitoring to banking transactions.

Sample Customers

GE, Toyota, P&G, Caterpillar, Flex, Schneider Electric, Sally Beauty, Eurostar, AstraZeneca, AirBnB, Whirlpool, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Nationwide, Aeropostale etc

United States Securities and Exchange Commission, National Health Service, Husch Blackwell LLP, NYC Health + Hospitals, Viatris, MITRE Corporation, Chubb, Kraft Heinz, KPMG, Kohler, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Purdue Pharma, AVL

Box - Intelligent Content Management vs. Kiteworks