Bosch inubit vs SAP Signavio Process Manager comparison

Bosch and SAP are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Bosch is ranked #43, while SAP is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.6. Bosch holds a 0.2% mindshare in BPM, compared to SAP’s 7.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Bosch users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Bosch inubit

Read 2 Bosch inubit reviews

248 Views
146 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Read 60 SAP Signavio Process Manager reviews

6,919 Views
4,526 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Bosch inubit

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Bosch inubit and SAP Signavio Process Manager are solutions in the process management sector. Data comparisons suggest SAP Signavio Process Manager may have an edge due to its comprehensive features, while Bosch inubit offers competitive pricing and support.

Features: Bosch inubit focuses on interoperability and integration, providing seamless connectivity with existing enterprise systems. It offers flexibility and robust automation tools for complex workflows. SAP Signavio Process Manager highlights collaborative modeling and its process library, enabling efficient process documentation and analysis. Its detailed reporting and simulation features enhance business process insights effectively.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bosch inubit features a straightforward deployment process with strong customer support options for setup and troubleshooting. SAP Signavio Process Manager provides a cloud-based deployment model supporting quick scalability with comprehensive support and training resources, offering responsive assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Bosch inubit is known for flexible pricing options, making it accessible for budget-focused businesses, with favorable ROI due to its customizable nature. SAP Signavio Process Manager presents a clearer long-term ROI through its robust feature set, justifying its higher setup costs, with upfront investment offset by its extensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,963 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bosch inubit

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

43rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Bosch inubit is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Signavio Process Manager is 7.7%, up from 6.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

it_user7347

CEO with 1,001-5,000 employees

First Look – Bosch Software Innovations inubit Suite 6

Bosch Software Innovations (the company that emerged from Bosch’s acquisition of Innovations Software Technology with its Visual Rules BRM suite some years ago) acquired inubit last year and has been working to develop an integrated portfolio. The inubit acquisition came after a number of joint…

Read full review

Cirvesh-Daga

Director at T-Systems International GmbH

Good visual representation for modelling and business process mapping but room for improvement in reporting functionalities

There is room for improvement in analytics. People don't realize it, but the world has changed in the last six to eight months. Customers want to see AI like ChatGPT and ML capabilities in all aspects of business processes and reporting. That would be my recommendation for any OEM in this value chain. Reporting could definitely be improved. I would like to see new features in analytics. I like that they analyze the process and give it to me visually, but I'd like the option to use DPMM instead of just DPC. I'd also like the option to have the process map laid out top to bottom instead of horizontally. Especially a choice between DPMN and EPC as a format. Because there are some people who are very comfortable with the EPC notation. The process is very clearly event-driven. There's an event, there's an action. It's very simple to understand. BPMN, which is the most popular business process notation, generally tends to have multiple frames. Actually, in multiple swimlanes rather. And those frames could each represent a particular kind of entity. Maybe it's an action, maybe it's an actor, maybe it's an event. So there are two different ways of notation. I just like Signavio to give us the ability to choose that notation. Because some companies use BPMN and some use the EPC. And then, if the minute you make that change, I'd like them to give us the flexibility of having an already plotted or vertically plotted option. Moreover, I would like to see improvement in the visual part. It's the piece that needs improvement. Currently, you can plot the diagram horizontally or vertically. However, I'd like the option to change the way the diagram is created, like switching between different notations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We contact their customer support often. They are very good and reliable."

"The formatting features are quite good because you can create very complex models, but you can easily clean them up so that they look very nice."

"Process Manager supports end-to-end transformation. Students can better understand end-to-end activity and processes as well as how they are run. For teaching, it's process discovery, then modeling, and finally optimization and simulation, partly. Typically, we showcase some simulation of the processes, and this is where we finish. That is why we validate that it's properly designed, but also what are the outcomes of modeled processes. There are also options for discussion on process optimization."

"There are many valuable features, of course. I would say the main value of Signavio is to have your current process map in a way that is easy to read and derive optimization actions to make it leaner, faster, more user friendly, etc. Another great feature is the visualization, which is easy to see and read. How they map the process is also very user friendly, with drag-and-drop functionality. Also, it's a very self-explanatory, user-friendly solution."

"The most valuable feature is that you can customize it completely with all of the attributes that you need."

"The Signavio tool is very easy to use and it is one of the reasons why I like it."

"We could increase the transparency and speed for the new ERP introduction. The status and changes by the new system are now clear to everybody and it is a great tool to train the people."

"I rate this solution a ten out of ten."

"When comparing my experience with Celonis and Signavio, I can discern the distinctions between these two platforms. However, I'm unable to differentiate between ARAs and add-ons, as that falls outside my scope of familiarity. Regarding Celonis, it comes with its set of advantages and disadvantages. Notably, it boasts robust features like action flows, task mining, and seamless integration with AML programming. Conversely, Signavio lacks action flows and instead relies on action segments and tasks for interaction. This discrepancy is a significant factor setting Selenium and SecureView apart. In the context of Signavio, it offers a combination of BPMN and process discovery, a feature absent in Celonis. This tandem of BPMN and process insight contributes to Signavio’S potency. Meanwhile, Celonis primarily features the process miner tool, setting it apart from Signavio. These variations collectively outline the numerous differences existing between Celonis and Signavio."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pros

Cons

"There are better solutions on the market. To make it a perfect ten, they should improve the price. There is a learning curve and sometimes there are issues from the software."

"There is a need for more varied access packages. The access packages that I have used are not cheap enough. They also provide a complete set of tools that are not always used. Sometimes, you need more segregated things, e.g., Signavio includes functionality for a company that has not yet matured. Since there are no basic packages, the company must pay for a package that is not fully used. Typically, process management is started in a company of a certain maturity."

"It could be more flexible from a customization point of view, where the user is able to display only whatever he needs."

"The product's pricing could be improved."

"I think the biggest selling point that Signavio talks about is its collaborative aspect. However, there's still a lot more improvement in terms of what they can do, how they receive comments, address comments, whether they actually provide feedback, etc. There is still a little bit more improvement to be made on those areas."

"I would like to see more integration with the process manager in terms of the workflow accelerator."

"I find it difficult to figure out how I can better align this solution with my KPIs."

"The tool's navigation could be improved."

"The user administration, the user-group administration, and the license models need improvement."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"I rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten."

"I think that the price of the licenses is between $2,000 USD and $3,000 USD per license per year, plus the hub usage. I cannot remember the exact cost, but it is affordable."

"We are only able to use the free academic licenses because we have a financial constraint. We are not able to pay for commercial licenses to use this kind of tool."

"The solution is expensive."

"The customer Journey Modeler is more than twice the price of Process Manager, which is a lot."

"It is expensive. The license is monthly."

"SAP Signavio charges a lot of money."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?

SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Signavio Process Manager?

The visual representation is extremely powerful and easy to use in process modeling and analysis. I can show it to someone who doesn't know business process mapping, and they still understand bec...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Signavio Process Manager?

Due to its SaaS nature, it is slightly challenging as a BPM tool. The pricing could be reduced further. I don't have the exact figures, but I believe it can be lowered because it's cloud-based.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Celonis vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 32% of the time

ARIS BPA vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Camunda vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 8% of the time

Visio vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 5% of the time

ADONIS vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More SAP Signavio Process Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

April 2025

Download Bosch inubit product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager

April 2025

Download SAP Signavio Process Manager product report

Also Known As

inubit

Signavio Process Editor

Overview

BPM+ expands classical Business Process Management that so far had a strong focus on the process management perspective. The new inubit Suite 6 reconciles data and process management and supports all process types such as Human Workslows, integration centric and document centric processes.

Bosch

The Signavio portfolio of web-based business transformation solutions helps companies to understand and optimize all of their business processes quickly and at scale, providing instant insights for informed decision-making. Signavio’s intuitive analysis, change management and execution solutions around process excellence include use cases like digital transformation, operational excellence and customer-centricity, placing them at the heart of global organizations.

Over 1 million users in more than 1,500 organizations worldwide rely on Signavio products to make processes part of their company’s DNA. Headquartered in Berlin, Germany, Signavio was founded in 2009 to address the need for a collaborative approach to process management.

Signavio was acquired by SAP in the first quarter of 2021. For more information, visit www.signavio.com

SAP

Sample Customers

BAFzA

DHL, Coca Cola EP, Prudential, Zalando, T-Systems, Jabil, Endress+Hauser, Rakuten

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

April 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Automation Anywhere and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.