Board vs Workiva Wdesk comparison

Board International and Workiva are both solutions in the Business Performance Management category. Board International is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3, while Workiva is ranked #12 with an average rating of 6.6. Board International holds a 6.6% mindshare in BPM, compared to Workiva’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Board International users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Workiva users who would recommend it.

Board

Read 37 Board reviews

1,748 Views
1,066 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Workiva Wdesk

Read 7 Workiva Wdesk reviews

2,193 Views
548 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

Board

Workiva Wdesk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Board and Workiva Wdesk are competing in business management and reporting solutions. Workiva Wdesk has the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and robust integration capabilities.

Features: Board focuses on data visualization, dashboards, and performance management for financial planning and analytics. Workiva Wdesk excels in collaboration tools, real-time data management, and compliance features suitable for audit and risk management.

Room for Improvement: Board can improve by expanding integration options, enhancing its real-time data capabilities, and developing audit compliance features. Workiva Wdesk could improve its pricing model to appeal to smaller businesses, simplify initial setup, and enhance visualization tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Workiva Wdesk offers a cloud-based deployment model with easy access and regular updates, supported by responsive customer service. Board provides both on-premise and cloud options, requiring more setup but offering greater control.

Pricing and ROI: Board presents a lower upfront investment appealing to budget-conscious buyers. Workiva Wdesk, though with potentially higher costs, offers strong ROI through advanced features and scalability, providing long-term value for organizations seeking detailed financial reporting and compliance capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Board vs. Workiva Wdesk Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Board vs. Workiva Wdesk

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 864,155 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Board

Ranking in Business Performance Management

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (21st), Reporting (18th)

Workiva Wdesk

Ranking in Business Performance Management

12th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

GRC (5th), Financial Close Software (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of Board is 6.6%, up from 5.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Workiva Wdesk is 3.4%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

Wiboon Thabsuwan

Senior Consultant at IMD Company Limited

Easy to use and requires less time to learn or understand its features

I think the product is good in terms of ease of use. The interface looks really nice and very easy to use. Every command appears in the icon. It looks like you don't have to understand everything about the command. You do not necessarily have to know more, or I would say that there is less time for our study about the products. Functionality-wise, it is quite easy to use and requires less time to understand or learn about the product. I am a software vendor, so I do not use the tool myself. I use it for my clients. My clients mostly use it for budgeting and timing purposes. I would say that's really less maintenance at all because they can do everything by themselves. It is good in terms of ease of use.

Read full review

Phillip Gough

Partner, Financial Services at Deloitte TT

The solution is easy to deploy and enables collaboration, but it must improve its speed and enable users to create pivot tables

I rate the ease of setup an eight out of ten. The initial setup was straightforward. The solution is cloud-based. We deployed the product along with Wdata in six months. It was for a lot of use cases. To deploy the tool, we designed the use cases and developed them. Then, we went through unit tests, integration tests, and user acceptance tests. It was an Agile delivery cycle.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Where it used to take me three days at the beginning of the year to create the new financial statement, now it is a matter of minutes because all the data is in the system."

"Primary valuable features are its flexibility and versatility and, obviously, functionality goes along with that. Plus, it does that at a small footprint in the file servers, and does it very efficiently."

"The ability to create a data model and have it in testing within a week is fantastic."

"It allows people to quickly create dashboards with reports."

"It has a good set of visual elements that you can use and can explain quite well."

"All the reports are prepared automatically."

"I think it's flexible. I chose this solution because, even though it wasn't out-of-the-box, you can customize it, and the long-term growth potential of the software is where I see the value."

"we are able to easily export data. When directors need financial information, we can go in the system and export the data, then send it out so they have it ready and available. If they are not in the office, we can email it to them. In addition, all the managers are now more on top of their expenses and their budget."

More Board pros

"It helps you to maintain a backup of your data, including the connectivity with the tables, which provides a user-friendly way to handle and access your files."

"The collaboration within the platform is valuable."

"It makes the compliance process more efficient and more effective."

"Workiva Wdesk has a flow diagram that is standardized, making it easy for people to file documents on ECDAs, which are in HTML format."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to easily upload and update financial results, creating a dynamic data sheet."

"The cross-functionality between connectivity, whether through API connections between different software platforms or the connection of data collection to the actual written ESG report, is highly valuable. The connectivity of all these aspects significantly aids in data assurance, which I consider a bonus."

"Workiva Wdesk is pretty good in terms of getting the data from the system, automating the reporting schedules...It has a very good integration with ERP tools."

Cons

"The product can be improved by making it possible to know where cubes are used."

"It can have more functionality for narrative reporting. They should also improve their training courses, which are currently very lightweight. When you get into more complex things, it is quite difficult to figure out what you're supposed to do, and you have to look at a lot of videos before you actually understand, which is a bit frustrating. Their training can be more comprehensive."

"One thing that I personally would like to see is additional visualization tools for visuals."

"I would like an eLearning platform for BOARD."

"We are looking at ways to improve how we deal with security in BOARD and other similar things. "

"I'd like to see a more passive report user for enterprise report writers that aren't particularly technical."

"Building similar models entirely from scratch could be made quicker with transfer abilities between databases and capsules."

"I would like to see better relationships with the partners."

More Board cons

"Regarding the solution, reporting has certain areas that can be considered for improvement."

"With this product, it's more about the integrated data model where you can have a one-to-many/many-to-one relationship between your policies and processes, risks, and controls. They need to showcase how you can put those pieces together."

"The speed must be improved."

"One area where Workiva Wdesk could improve is by ensuring that its cloud-based system is fully compatible with the most current versions of PowerPoint and Excel."

"The tool's script encoding needs to be updated to make it more user-friendly and less of a manual process when changes are made to a company's program. Those changes happen frequently due to mandatory or voluntary reporting requirements, leading to lost linkage connections that must be manually reset each time a change is made. This aspect is not functional now, and I see it as an opportunity for improvement."

"At this point, I don't see a compelling reason to invest in Workiva. It may be necessary for compliance and controlling the version of SCC, but not everyone needs its high-end capabilities."

"The most critical issue is the need to shift between uppercase and lowercase."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is not the cheapest product on earth, but you get so much. It provides good value for money."

"The solution is quite expensive, if it is made cheaper then we can have more clients. I rate it four out of ten."

"Find a partner who will take responsibility for the implementation, and be available for support."

"The tool's price is a bit high compared to other solutions."

"In terms of the pricing, it was reasonable. BOARD is not the lowest in the market, but it was reasonable for us."

"Our clients in Asia think that the solution is too expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,155 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Is Board better than Anaplan as a Business Intelligence (BI) solution?

We've had several FP&A departments include Anaplan in their analytics discussions, and while BI information IS generated, the focus is generally on compiling input from various sources and simu...

See all answers

What do you like most about Board?

All the reports are prepared automatically.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Board?

Board's integration could be a bit more robust, but what we have works. If the design isn't right, the flexibility of Board can negatively impact performance.

See all answers

What do you like most about Workiva Wdesk?

The most valuable feature is its ability to easily upload and update financial results, creating a dynamic data sheet.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Workiva Wdesk?

Wdesk is affordable and as far as I'm aware, there were no additional costs beyond the standard license increase. We didn't have to make any other changes; it primarily involved accessing the platf...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Workiva Wdesk?

The tool's script encoding needs to be updated to make it more user-friendly and less of a manual process when changes are made to a company's program. Those changes happen frequently due to mandat...

See all answers

Comparisons

Anaplan vs Board

Compared 28% of the time

Pigment vs Board

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Board

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Hyperion vs Board

Compared 8% of the time

More Board Competitors

AuditBoard vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 27% of the time

CCH Tagetik vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 8% of the time

RSA Archer vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 7% of the time

LucaNet vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Performance Management Cloud vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 6% of the time

More Workiva Wdesk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Board

July 2025

Download Board product report

Buyer's Guide

Workiva Wdesk

July 2025

Download Workiva Wdesk product report

Also Known As

No data available

Wdesk

Overview

BOARD International - headquartered in Switzerland - is a leading global provider of software for improving business results through better decision making. By unifying Business Intelligence and Corporate Performance Management into a single product, BOARD enables companies to achieve a shared vision of their performance across the entire organization, and thus a single version of the truth.

BOARD provides seamless solutions for • Reporting & Analysis • Budgeting, Planning & Forecasting • Profitability Modelling & Optimization • Simulation & What-if-Analysis • Scorecarding & Strategy Management • Financial Consolidation. Based on visual modelling, BOARD has enabled global companies to deploy BI and CPM applications without a single line of code in a fraction of the time and cost associated with traditional solutions.

Board International

Wdesk is used across the enterprise to support hundreds of data collaboration, reporting, and compliance processes. Use Wdesk to:

Optimize your structured and composite reports
Improve trust in your data, reports, and presentations
Transform processes to enable insight

Workiva

Sample Customers

Coca-Cola, Puma, Desigual, Ricoh, KPMG, H&M, Groupe SEB

Noodles Company, eBay, Winnebago, American Assets Trust, AmericanEnterprise, Calpian, Capstone Infrastructure, Cascades, Circor International, Coeur Mining, Davey, Dr Pepper Snapple

Buyer's Guide

Board vs. Workiva Wdesk

July 2025

Free Report: Board vs. Workiva Wdesk

Find out what your peers are saying about Board vs. Workiva Wdesk and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

864,155 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Board vs. Workiva Wdesk report.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.