BMC TrueSight Orchestration vs Oracle BPEL comparison

BMC and Oracle are both solutions in the Process Automation category. BMC is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.7, while Oracle is ranked #25 with an average rating of 7.7. BMC holds a 0.6% mindshare in PA, compared to Oracle’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

BMC TrueSight Orchestration

Read 9 BMC TrueSight Orchestration reviews

446 Views
280 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Oracle BPEL

Read 4 Oracle BPEL reviews

528 Views
218 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

BMC TrueSight Orchestration

Oracle BPEL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

BMC TrueSight Orchestration and Oracle BPEL are competitors in IT process automation and business process execution. BMC holds an edge in pricing and support, while Oracle is favored for its advanced features.

Features: BMC TrueSight Orchestration is noted for its flexibility in automation workflows, intuitive user interface, and comprehensive integration capabilities. Oracle BPEL provides robust process management tools, seamless integration, and tracks variables and results effectively.

Room for Improvement: BMC TrueSight Orchestration could enhance its user interface aesthetics, provide more customization options, and improve cloud compatibility. Oracle BPEL could streamline its deployment process, offer better support for non-SOA environments, and reduce the complexity of its integration options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC TrueSight Orchestration offers straightforward deployment and robust customer service, supporting quick integration. Oracle BPEL provides detailed integration guidance and substantial support, though the deployment process may be more complex.

Pricing and ROI: BMC TrueSight Orchestration is budget-friendly with a quicker ROI due to less complex integration. Oracle BPEL has higher initial costs but offers significant ROI for comprehensive feature investment.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC TrueSight Orchestration vs. Oracle BPEL Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BMC TrueSight Orchestration vs. Oracle BPEL

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC TrueSight Orchestration

Ranking in Process Automation

24th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle BPEL

Ranking in Process Automation

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of BMC TrueSight Orchestration is 0.6%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle BPEL is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Ilhami Arikan

Cloud Services Automation Technologies Manager at Garanti Teknoloji

An orchestration tool to automate the end-to-end process with a need to improve its user experience

In BMC TrueSight Orchestration, login is just text-based, so it's really hard to find the problem. We cannot see the ongoing running jobs or interfere with them on an interface. So it's unavailable. There are some restrictions about the permissions, especially the level of the permissions, even though there is not very much there. It's a little bit hard to use clients' development tools, so the user experience may be improved. There is room for improvement for the local team.

Read full review

Posham Nampelli

Architecture and Consulting at Synaptics Inc

A highly scalable solution that provides various features for the execution of business processes

I'm a consultant. I do architecting, designing, and development. I have used two versions, 1.1 and 2.0. I’m unsure about the prices because I oversee the development and implementation. I'll highly recommend the product depending on an organization’s requirements. As someone who has worked with BPEL for 13 years, I highly recommend the product for an on-premise or hybrid integration. Multiple products or alternate solutions have come into the integration domain. However, the product has been in the industry from SOA 11g to SOA 12c and OIC. Though there are multiple competitors, the product has been here for a long time and has been helping multiple customers improve their business. Overall, I rate the solution a nine or nine and a half out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product has a very good triggering mechanism."

"The initial setup is easy. The deployment was done in an hour."

"We particularly like the integration functionality of this solution. This product is open API, which means that it can be integrated with any solution from any other brand."

"The best thing about TrueSight is the user interface, which is intuitive and easy to use. It supports accessibility and exporting, so we can output to the format we require. We can use TrueSight to integrate nearly any other product. I can't think of another product that can match this functionality. We also have Microsoft Orchestrator, but it can't match BMC TrueSight Orchestration."

"This solution is scalable."

"We can implement compliance standards with the solution. You can also do patching so that the environment is compliant and secure from external threats and hacking. We can provision multiple systems with the help of predefined templates that the organization has forwarded us. The solution’s users can also integrate multiple products which can be either BMC or non-BMC. There are numerous possibilities that can be done with server automation"

"The best feature of BMC TrueSight Orchestration is the number of integrated mechanisms it provides."

"I find the provisioning to be the most valuable."

More BMC TrueSight Orchestration pros

"What I find the most valuable about Oracle BPEL is that it saves me time."

"The most valuable feature is the support for human tasks."

"The product has everything we need."

"The solution is very seamless and fast."

Cons

"Regarding scalability, the architecture does not allow you to add additional servers just able to use two application servers, so it's not scalable."

"The solution should move to the cloud. Every application from the BMC is on the container and moving to the cloud. There is also a number of limitations for the smart reporting feature of the TrueSight server which is not working in sync. We did not get any satisfactory reply from BMC on that note. We are not able to do the real-time sync between HSA and non-HSA service reporting tools and the actual application tools."

"It would be helpful if TrueSight could log errors in a better format. I would also like to see more connector support. Let's say I have a third-party vendor that I need to integrate with Ansible. It would be helpful if BMC announced a specific connector for that. I've encountered situations where I need to work with scripts or find another way to integrate a particular product with TrueSight Orchestration. BMC already supports many products. For example, we have a connector for Ansible, but I think it needs to be improved some."

"We are aiming for AI automation and look for support from BMC. The features are currently missing but we are hoping for some upgrade in this matter."

"The solution is not user-friendly."

"BMC TrueSight Orchestration is difficult to understand. It's not very user-friendly."

"BMC TrueSight Orchestration could improve by providing some visibility on how the workflows are progressing."

"The architecture of this solution needs improvement, it is very complicated. It creates a lot of problems in our environment. Most of the time I am trying to find and solve the problem."

More BMC TrueSight Orchestration cons

"They need to have support for new protocols like GraphQL and possibly some out-of-the-box adapters for SAP and other big systems."

"In the next release, I would like to see REST improved and new technologies for microservices. I'd like to see more containers for separating containers."

"Some user-defined functions for transformation must be added to the next release of the solution."

"The solution's integration with SAP should be seamless because some formats are not accepted in SAP but are accepted in Oracle BPEL."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing is available in different ways and depends on data being consumed by users and nodes being operated."

"Licensing is per lot, or per agent — one agent is one license."

"There is a huge cost saving with BMC TrueSight compared to other solutions."

"Regarding pricing, it comes with the package when you buy the server automation. But it's made depending on some agreements for companies, of which I don't know the clause."

"The solution's pricing is moderate and not expensive."

"The product is moderately priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

19%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BMC TrueSight Orchestration?

The automation helps in payment transactions through BHIM app. The BMC helps in smooth clearance of all payments without using MasterCard or Visa. The solution is ready to use, and there is no need...

See all answers

What needs improvement with BMC TrueSight Orchestration?

We are aiming for AI automation and look for support from BMC. The features are currently missing but we are hoping for some upgrade in this matter.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BMC TrueSight Orchestration?

BMC TrueSight is majorly used for database backup and auto remediation for the networks. It is also used for server provisioning.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle BPEL?

The product has everything we need.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle BPEL?

They need to have support for new protocols like GraphQL and possibly some out-of-the-box adapters for SAP and other big systems. It should be better if the SAP adapter were included in the bundle.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle BPEL?

We primarily use Oracle BPEL for process automation. It is used for workflows for documents, data transfers, and other processes implemented for our customers.

See all answers

Comparisons

Control-M vs BMC TrueSight Orchestration

Compared 52% of the time

ServiceNow Orchestration vs BMC TrueSight Orchestration

Compared 26% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs BMC TrueSight Orchestration

Compared 22% of the time

More BMC TrueSight Orchestration Competitors

Camunda vs Oracle BPEL

Compared 48% of the time

Flowable vs Oracle BPEL

Compared 35% of the time

Bonita vs Oracle BPEL

Compared 17% of the time

More Oracle BPEL Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BMC TrueSight Orchestration

April 2025

Download BMC TrueSight Orchestration product report

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

April 2025

Download Oracle BPEL product report

Also Known As

TrueSight Orchestration, Atrium Orchestrator

BPEL Process Manager

Overview

IT process automation can significantly lower the cost of IT delivery and reduce the risk associated with manual interactions. BMC Atrium Orchestrator automates common, repeatable tasks to improve quality of service across the board.

Move from reactive, manual handling of requests to a fully automated system
Deliver consistent task and automation workflow results
Automate data collection for audit compliance
Align with best practices
Free up IT resources

BMC

Oracle BPEL (Business Process Execution Language) Process Manager is a tool for designing and running business processes. This product provides a comprehensive, standardsÂbased and easy to use solution for creating, deploying and managing crossÂapplication business processes with both automated and human workflow steps â all in a serviceÂoriented architecture. Oracle BPEL Process Manager is a powerful integration tool for the enterprise. Its ability to connect to external systems and process, mixed with its support for a variety of presentation technologies makes it an ideal tool for defining and implementing business process logic.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Ameritas, Buckeye Partners, KNAB, Dex Media, News UK

Nacional Monte de Piedad IAP, Bimbo S.A. de C.V., Intelligent Pathways, DVZ Datenverarbeitungszentrum Mecklenburg-Vorpommern GmbH, Arqiva

Buyer's Guide

BMC TrueSight Orchestration vs. Oracle BPEL

April 2025

Free Report: BMC TrueSight Orchestration vs. Oracle BPEL

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC TrueSight Orchestration vs. Oracle BPEL and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC TrueSight Orchestration vs. Oracle BPEL report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.