We performed a comparison between Camunda and Oracle BPEL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is that, with a visual system, you can try to have a process client before beginning the programming for the application."
"The most valuable features are the workflow, the task list, and the modeler where we use VPN."
"The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable."
"We can easily define and deploy business processes. Camunda provides the tools that allow business people to design business processes. We don't have to have developers for it. It is so easy to use that our business people can go into the tool and model their business processes. We get time to do other things than just designing business processes."
"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."
"It is an absolutely stable solution."
"I like everything about the entire BPM that comes with the BPM suite."
"I think that the positives of Camunda Platform are that our customers can start with the free version. I think it is the most important."
"What I find the most valuable about Oracle BPEL is that it saves me time."
"The product has everything we need."
"It would be helpful to have more readily available use cases on the internet. Camunda's documentation feels less comprehensive."
"The user interface needs some polishing because it is too technical for end-users to use it."
"The latency of API could be decreased."
"As we experienced some difficulties in the beginning, deployment took almost a month."
"The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages."
"Camunda could be improved by making it easier to modify a process. You can program it to follow a process, but it is difficult to modify the process when the application is in use. It could also be improved by making it easier to use the visual platform without needing to be informed on that. Sometimes, we programmers haven't used it in the past, and it's a bit difficult to learn it."
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options."
"In the future, I would like to see better transactional integrity."
"Some user-defined functions for transformation must be added to the next release of the solution."
"In the next release, I would like to see REST improved and new technologies for microservices. I'd like to see more containers for separating containers."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Process Automation with 69 reviews while Oracle BPEL is ranked 16th in Process Automation with 2 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while Oracle BPEL is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle BPEL writes "A highly scalable solution that provides various features for the execution of business processes". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas Oracle BPEL is most compared with BizTalk Server and Bonita. See our Camunda vs. Oracle BPEL report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.