"The event management part of TrueSight Operations Management, in my experience, is probably the best in the market. You have endless flexibility. You can build your own rules, you have the MRL language, and you can implement any kind of logic on the alerts. It may be correlation, abstraction, or executing something as a result of the alerts. You have almost the whole range of options available for event management using the available customization."
"I like everything about this tool. I recommend this solution to anyone looking for a standalone solution with high availability meaning that can be used depending on the customers requirements."
"The most valuable features are the rich reports, high performance, and the look and feel of the WebEx webpage are very good."
"The solution has a very good business event manager tool."
"I like the deep-dive detail and end-user metrics data. The synthetic monitor is the best one. The best point of the new one is that there's no need for configuration. You can inject the Java script and start to change major developments in the application. This is a good approach, and we received all the data using this."
"Intelligent solution with a proactive monitoring feature and consolidated dashboard that's stable and easy to scale."
"The most valuable features are monitoring and reporting."
"It's too complex, too many servers are required, there are too many different components in the solution, and a lot of agents are required."
"I would like them to improve the deep-dive details, tracing, and data agents in this product. We have EUEM, an end-user experience monitoring appliance. This one's quicker than the current one, and reporting side and filtration side are very bad. There are many details we look at and explain what we receive information in the current one, but we cannot have historical data like we do with EUEM. We cannot have a powerful point to look for specific traffic from a specific application and a specific browser. We don't have it in the new one. The current BMC also needs to add the thing that control versions."
"The solution is overly complex."
"This solution is lacking in application monitoring features. Technical support for this solution also needs improvement, particularly in product knowledge and response time."
"There are some small limitations with this tool in terms of reporting dashboards that fit all of the requirements of the individual customer."
"Technical support could use some improvement."
More BMC TrueSight Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
BMC TrueSight Operations Management is ranked 11th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 6 reviews while SolarWinds Pingdom is ranked 33rd in Application Performance Management (APM) with 1 review. BMC TrueSight Operations Management is rated 8.8, while SolarWinds Pingdom is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of BMC TrueSight Operations Management writes "Monitors a mix of on-prem and cloud, and predictive alerts help maintain availability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SolarWinds Pingdom writes "A reasonable-priced monitoring solution with good reporting". BMC TrueSight Operations Management is most compared with BMC Helix Monitor, Dynatrace, Splunk, AppDynamics and Zabbix, whereas SolarWinds Pingdom is most compared with Azure Monitor, New Relic Synthetics, New Relic APM, Zabbix and Splunk.
See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
