Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bizagi vs Unqork comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.5
Bizagi offers substantial ROI with significant returns, cost-effectiveness, and competitive advantages, enhancing satisfaction among users.
Sentiment score
8.3
Unqork offers cost-effective, efficient application development with 20-30% workload reduction, yielding positive feedback and favorable ROI.
The platform provides default workspaces, and managing or increasing space is easier compared to other platforms.
Using Unqork has resulted in improved cost-saving, time-saving, and resource-saving benefits for our projects.
Two to three projects saw a twenty to thirty percent reduction in workload, indicating a profitable pricing structure.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.0
Bizagi offers efficient customer service with occasional delays; premium plans improve responsiveness, though inconsistencies exist for others.
Sentiment score
7.5
Unqork's customer service is reliable and responsive, with fast resolutions but occasional inconsistency in support quality.
It is a community product, there is not much support we can expect.
The toolset is very intuitive, so we didn’t need to contact their support much.
I rate their technical support as excellent.
The Unqork community portal and academy provide extensive information, with 60 to 70% of required information readily available.
The Unqork community helped integrate features like colored status indicators using JavaScript.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
Bizagi is scalable and suitable for medium-sized businesses, with growth potential and performance reliant on infrastructure quality.
Sentiment score
7.0
Unqork is scalable and adaptable, but faces challenges with large data volumes and high-traffic systems, averaging six to eight ratings.
There is no direct scalability option.
If I rate scalability from one to ten, I would probably give it a six.
Its cloud infrastructure simplifies global access to data and services without the fear of losing data.
Scalability features like UI and APIs are all available within the same platform, making it easy to handle increased demands.
Not every project can be executed through Unqork as some complex requirements might need proof of concept before proceeding.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
Bizagi is reliable with minor update issues, appreciated for performance and stability, but occasional bugs accompany new features.
Sentiment score
6.7
Unqork is stable and reliable, though complex projects may face occasional issues, with outcomes improving through proper usage.
A component's previously set value might be missing the next day, affecting reliability.
The main issue I have with Unqork is the limited availability of learning resources.
There have been no significant stability issues where the entire platform went down.
 

Room For Improvement

Bizagi requires enhancements in performance, integration, user interface, pricing, documentation, automation, reporting, marketing, and support.
Unqork users seek improved UI, mobile support, learning resources, platform interoperability, and enhanced grid, analytics, and collaboration features.
Reporting capabilities can be improved more, and community support should be increased.
For more mature environments, the integration to live systems is lacking, which affects its applicability.
Unqork moved from the Sanctuary to Vega platform without providing a migration tool, necessitating manual updates.
The setup for API calls was initially challenging, especially when dealing with service logs and transforming large JSON codes for validation and PDF generation.
It would be beneficial if they further improved compatibility with both the previous Sencha compiler and the new Vega compiler.
 

Setup Cost

Bizagi offers a free modeler while the full BPM suite, with revised licensing prices, favors larger enterprises over smaller ones.
Enterprise users have mixed opinions on Unqork's cost-effectiveness, with pricing variably perceived as affordable or expensive compared to competitors.
Bizagi's pricing is very aggressive, and it was one of the reasons we chose it.
The certification costs are particularly high, around 16,000 Indian Rupees.
The certification costs around $2000, which is ten times the price of UiPath.
In my experience, it seemed somewhat underpriced, possibly due to being an early adopter.
 

Valuable Features

Bizagi offers a user-friendly, BPMN 2.0 compliant platform excelling in process modeling and automation with fast, agile development.
Unqork provides a no-code platform enabling fast app development with enterprise integrations, AI, and advanced UI components.
It is open source.
The user interface is very good, making it easy for business people to understand.
It streamlines operations by automating the process across various departments, allowing cash requests to be raised, reviewed, and approved more efficiently.
Performance-wise, Unqork facilitates connecting and configuring systems synchronously and efficiently.
Unqork allows me to write HTML code, use JavaScript, Angular, and React, which significantly enhances its flexibility.
 

Categories and Ranking

Bizagi
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
16th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (6th), Business Process Management (BPM) (11th), Process Automation (8th), Low-Code Development Platforms (11th), No-Code Development Platforms (5th), Process Mining (7th)
Unqork
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
12th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of Bizagi is 2.1%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Unqork is 2.0%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

Paparao Nadipineni - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables budget review efficiency with open source advantages and workflow orchestration
Definitely, right now, it is purely open source, and we don't have much community support. If they add a few more capabilities like AIML and DocGen AI, these features would be good. Reporting capabilities can be improved more, and community support should be increased. Otherwise, people cannot onboard that particular technology easily.
Rajeev Lochan - PeerSpot reviewer
Great UI and out-of-the-box integrations, but needs expanded cloud platform support
Given the rapid pace of innovation we’ve already seen from Unqork, there are a few major capability gaps we face currently. However, some areas of improvement and features we would benefit from in upcoming releases include: 1. Enhanced accessibility compliance - While meeting baseline standards, further WCAG conformance and widgets optimized for screen readers could expand access for disabled users of Unqork solutions. Added compliance certifications would also be welcomed. 2. Expanded cloud platform support - The addition of Azure and Google Cloud alongside AWS would allow our deployment options to better align with enterprise strategic cloud choices outside just Amazon. 3. More analytics and observability - Increased telemetry on app performance, component reuse rates, load testing etc. would help fine-tune Unqork solutions. More data and dashboard visibility into adoption would optimize our ROI. 4. Managing technical debt - As portfolios of Unqork apps grow over time, best practices and features to facilitate updating legacy components, refactoring old solutions, and preventing erosion will be helpful. Added controls to manage technical debt long-term. 5. Evolution of existing components - Existing rich widgets and connectors rounding out maturity with incremental capabilities would expand Unqork's versatility. Expanding the range of use cases served by current components. 6. Offline functionality - For mobile solutions, some limited persistent caching and offline usability during intermittent connectivity would better support field agents/inspectors. Tolerating offline states is key. 7. Design version control - Advancing visual version control capabilities for better design history, branching, merging, and reverting changes to Unqork sites would improve collaboration and prevent overwrite errors by nontechnical users.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
38%
Insurance Company
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How easy is it to migrate process flow charts (modeled using tools like Visio) into Bizagi?
I have been using Bizagi with a major project for a state government agency for about four years now. It is pretty straightforward to load in files that are BPMN 2.0 compliant. The option to load V...
What do you like most about Bizagi?
The natural notation is the best feature of Bizagi because it makes it compatible with other products.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bizagi?
Bizagi's pricing is very aggressive, and it was one of the reasons we chose it. It was less expensive than some of the other tools.
What do you like most about Unqork?
Unqork UI behaves consistently across devices and seamlessly adapts to various form factors.
What needs improvement with Unqork?
The areas of Unqork that need improvement include the UI, as data-driven applications in banks require displaying data effectively on forms and dashboards. When working with JPMorgan, the data stru...
What is your primary use case for Unqork?
I mostly work with Unqork to develop internal applications, and right now, I'm working with JPMorgan in a department called Asset Wealth Management. We try to automate processes that were previousl...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

adidas, Audi, BNP Paribas, Deutsche Post DHL & many more - 500+ customer globally.
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Bizagi vs. Unqork and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.