No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Bitrix24 vs Bullhorn comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitrix24
Ranking in CRM
34th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Project Management Software (26th), Enterprise Social Software (20th)
Bullhorn
Ranking in CRM
32nd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Applicant Tracking and Recruiting Software (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the CRM category, the mindshare of Bitrix24 is 0.8%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bullhorn is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
CRM Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Bullhorn0.6%
Bitrix240.8%
Other98.6%
CRM
 

Featured Reviews

Abasiakama Bassey - PeerSpot reviewer
Founder at Elxae Hub
A project management tool that offers great scalability and stability
The support provided by Bitrix24 is an area with shortcomings that needs improvement. From an improvement perspective, Bitrix24 should consider providing live and upfront support to its users, especially those who use the solution's free version. If you want someone to get on your platform for which you can't provide support, then it doesn't make that platform any different from its competitors. It would make sense to people if Bitrix24 could provide support for even their free version. It would be good if Bitrix24 added some accounting elements to the tool instead of just providing functionality related to bookkeeping alone since it can help Bitrix24 become a complete tool. During the setup phase of the solution, the tool should provide its users an option to add the accounting part, making it a complete solution.
Christiane Hauk - PeerSpot reviewer
COO at RM Group (Switzerland)
Have improved workflows through automation but faced challenges with feature limitations and unclear pricing
The impact of those automation features on our operational efficiency is huge; however, what I don't appreciate about it is that it's very limited; it's limited to Bullhorn and, even within Bullhorn, it's limited to the candidate, the placement, the job, and the contact entity. You cannot automate files, notes, or change requests, so it's very limited, and they also don't do any further development in this anymore since AI is on the market. When it comes to automation in Bullhorn, I would appreciate seeing that automation is possible for integrating files. For example, that you can say, show me all candidates who don't have a file or which have a file that is older than one year, or which have a file type of resume or contract. I would appreciate seeing the possibility to build automations based on change requests, where you can automate according to the status submitted or approved, which is currently not possible, or automation based on notes. When it comes to the missing features in Bullhorn, I have numerous suggestions. Recently they introduced the AI assistant, which is a chatbot within Bullhorn that can refer to candidate, contact, and job data, which is great. However, the output from your prompt can only be copied to a clipboard and not inserted into a Bullhorn field, meaning you always have to do three, four more clicks to get it over to an email or to the field that publishes the job ad. This functionality has to be developed further because there are other tools that can already do this. The prompting and formatting possibilities within the prompt are very limited as well. Regarding AI, there is no match top candidates functionality that provides results good enough to use. We are already using the Textkernel search, which is the future search Bullhorn will integrate. Additionally, we also work with Bullhorn Onboarding, which is a catastrophe; it's not further developed, and they have not provided a new solution for the German-speaking market in five years. We also use the Canvas reporting tool that lacks further development; there are limitations on what you can build reports on. I would appreciate seeing improvements there, and to close this circle, I would appreciate seeing a kind of avatar that can conduct a first interview with a candidate.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution's most valuable feature is its project management functionality...It is a pretty stable solution."
"The most valuable features are data entry, the pipeline view with filters, and the automation capabilities."
"We use Bitrix24 to track sales activities in the same way that we used HubSpot."
"We use many of this solution's features for communication and for process automation, and it offers more functionality than a regular CRM."
"Bitrix24's workflow is better than that of others. The user interface is also good."
"The data entry functionality is excellent, and the pipeline views and filters are highly useful."
"The CRM and collaboration tools are well-designed for our purposes. Your projects can be based on tasks, CRM, or opportunities. The task-based features are the most valuable for us right now."
"Initially, Bitrix24 improved the way we operate because we were not previously using a CRM. Before Bitrix24, we tracked everything through Outlook. Now, we have a tool that will automatically put out reports for us."
"What I appreciate most about Bullhorn's core functionalities and ATS functionalities is that it is highly customizable, the UI is very user friendly, and it's very easy to train."
"What I appreciate best about Bullhorn is its user interface, which is really nice, and I enjoy the flexibility that you have with it and how you can customize it to meet your needs."
 

Cons

"Our financial department does not use Bitrix24 because it's not good for the sort of work they do. So, once we create an invoice in Bitrix24, we sent it to the client and the financial department and they enter it separately into their system. This is not great for us since we can't track what happens after a sale."
"Compared to Microsoft, we found Bitrix24 a little complex because it's new to us, and we don't understand it much."
"The solution's open channel and contact center could be improved."
"I would like to see improvements with Bitrix24's marketing automation."
"There are some bugs in the mobile system."
"There is a need for better integration with ERP solutions."
"Some functionalities of the tool required specific expertise. For example, the SIP Connector is difficult to install."
"The web interface is good but the client interface is not very user-friendly and needs to improve."
"Bullhorn Onboarding, which is a catastrophe; it's not further developed, and they have not provided a new solution for the German-speaking market in five years."
"I think one thing that could be improved is that it's expensive."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing for this program is reasonable."
"I use the free version. I sense that my company will need a license for the solution in a few months to use some features like lead management."
"The solution's pricing is quite average and not expensive."
"The product's pricing is okay for me. It is not expensive."
"Licenses are cheap compared to other solutions."
"We were using the free version which was really limited in terms of functionality."
"Bitrix24 used to be cheaper, but now it's getting expensive."
"The cost is $2,500, which will be spread out over 18 to 24 months."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which CRM solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Construction Company
23%
Comms Service Provider
14%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Outsourcing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise1
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitrix24?
The pricing for Bitrix24 is reasonable and standardized. However, we face limitations in Venezuela, where monthly invoicing isn't available, forcing us to pay annually.
What needs improvement with Bitrix24?
We need full ERP integration to take all our processes in one platform. Additionally, extracting data can be troublesome, as we have to use Russian APIs, which poses a security concern.
What advice do you have for others considering Bitrix24?
I would recommend Bitrix24 to others. Although we are moving to another solution, Bitrix24 offers impressive capabilities we haven’t utilized fully. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bullhorn?
Bullhorn is expensive, and if you are looking to scale your operations, it really shines.
What needs improvement with Bullhorn?
The impact of those automation features on our operational efficiency is huge; however, what I don't appreciate about it is that it's very limited; it's limited to Bullhorn and, even within Bullhor...
What is your primary use case for Bullhorn?
We are an agency, a staffing agency, and we use Bullhorn mainly as an ATS, so we use it for reporting, onboarding, and to process our payrolling requests.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

mobilblitz Geissler & Ulrich GbR, Caloryfrio.com, k-webs, Ecuatoriana Industrial, Artistic Closets, Saigon Newport Corporation
Tiro Partners, Skills Alliance, Think IT Recruitment, Mclaren Consultancy, REACH Employment Services, Aurec, FocusCore, Icon Partners, Curate Partners, Rowben Consulting, Richard Lloyd, Peoplefusion, Gemini People, Glotel
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitrix24 vs. Bullhorn and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.