BioCatch vs SAS Fraud Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BioCatch Logo
1,782 views|1,035 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
SAS Logo
1,206 views|671 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BioCatch and SAS Fraud Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.
To learn more, read our detailed Fraud Detection and Prevention Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It can track mouse movements as well as the actual oriental moments of such as the movement of devices, how they are held, and the angles which at they are held. All these are captured for customers and a behavioral profile is built for the customer over a period of time. This would be matched against any fraudulent behavior. If, for example, suddenly a customer account seems to be accessed by our profile, which is not one particular customer account, if the movements or habits are suspect, we can catch the fraud and shut it down."

More BioCatch Pros →

"The solution is easy to use.""The security is also very good."

More SAS Fraud Management Pros →

Cons
"BioCatch is one of the fraud detection tools which also has machine learning capabilities and it has what is called a machine learning model feature. It is run in the background. The consequence of those machine models is it is complex to perform data functions and the activity and programming techniques. The decision-making for determining what's happening within those models is a little bit complex and not at all transparent. It's not easy for businesses to understand how the model is using the data of the bank customers in order to come to the assumption it does."

More BioCatch Cons →

"Occasionally, there are some mechanisms that can work a bit slow."

More SAS Fraud Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "If your company has the budget, I would absolutely recommend SAS."
  • More SAS Fraud Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Views
    1,782
    Comparisons
    1,035
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    1,206
    Comparisons
    671
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Fraud Detection and Prevention
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    BioCatch is a cybersecurity company that delivers behavioral biometrics, analyzing human-device interactions to protect users and data. Banks and other enterprises use BioCatch to significantly reduce online fraud and protect against a variety of cyber threats, without compromising the user experience.

    Respond faster to new threats. Reduce false positives for a better customer experience. SAS Fraud Management uses industry-leading data analytics and machine learning to monitor payments and nonmonetary transactions, as well as events, enabling you to identify and respond to unwanted and suspicious behavior in real time.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Nets
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm56%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Comms Service Provider4%
    Manufacturing Company3%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm37%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Construction Company6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise79%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise77%
    Buyer's Guide
    Fraud Detection and Prevention
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    BioCatch is ranked 5th in Fraud Detection and Prevention while SAS Fraud Management is ranked 11th in Fraud Detection and Prevention. BioCatch is rated 8.0, while SAS Fraud Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of BioCatch writes "Stable with good behavioral biometrics and great technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Fraud Management writes "Monitor multiple channels with a single platform". BioCatch is most compared with ThreatMetrix, IBM Trusteer, Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub, F5 Shape Security and Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management, whereas SAS Fraud Management is most compared with FICO Falcon Platform, IBM Safer Payments, Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management, IBM Financial Crimes Insights (FCI) and ThreatMetrix.

    See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

    We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.