We performed a comparison between Barracuda Web Application Firewall and Indusface AppTrana based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The installation is straightforward."
"It allows us to scale out to multiple phase servers."
"We use Barracuda to protect the application. That's the main feature we use it for."
"It significantly improved our overall web security posture, addressing intrusions and enhancing control over web URLs in our environment."
"It's very simple and predictable, because Barracuda provides a vision of the current state of your application. It gives you an understanding of what is happening on your site and any attempts against you at your source. This is the main value that Web Application Firewall provides our company. These aspects are also the main reason for this documentation process."
"What I like most about Barracuda Web Application Firewall is its availability. I also like that it's an easy-to-use solution."
"Parameter Protection is a valuable feature."
"I find the solution very stable."
"We use Indusface AppTrana as a firewall."
"The solution could use more reports."
"This product could easily progress to be among the industry leaders. I think they need to improve enterprise level automation. It integrates with a small number of vulnerability scanners, so report results should be imported manually; same for SIEM integration."
"The incident reporting needs to be improved."
"We encountered a few glitches while implementing API security features into the product."
"The usability of the interface could be improved."
"Sometimes when we put it in action, we have some blogs that appear as false positives. I think that it's improving. Barracuda should minimize false positives."
"In the Barracuda Web Application Firewall, there should be more affordable options for WAF as a service."
"We've had some blocks of the application and some false positives."
"The solution should add an enhanced dashboard to make it easy to navigate."
More Barracuda Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →
Barracuda Web Application Firewall is ranked 14th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 38 reviews while Indusface AppTrana is ranked 26th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. Barracuda Web Application Firewall is rated 8.2, while Indusface AppTrana is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Barracuda Web Application Firewall writes "Provides strong issue discovery capabilities; enhance the security parameters of web applications and suitable for medium to large enterprises". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Indusface AppTrana writes "Cost-effective and used as an effective firewall". Barracuda Web Application Firewall is most compared with Fortinet FortiWeb, F5 Advanced WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, HAProxy and Kemp LoadMaster, whereas Indusface AppTrana is most compared with F5 Advanced WAF, Azure Web Application Firewall and Radware DefensePro.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.