We performed a comparison between F5 Advanced WAF and Indusface AppTrana based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."Feature-wise, they are always cutting edge and up-to-date. Many features aren't available via competitors. There's always a lot of enhanced critical features that just aren't available through anyone else, or, if they are, are too lightweight."
"The solution is easily accessible on mobile and laptop devices."
"F5 Advanced WAF secures our connectivity and combines both the main functions of WAF (balancing and web application security)."
"In terms of F5 Advanced WAF's most valuable features, I would definitely say its stability. F5 is one the most stable products. Either as the load balancer or the web application firewall, it is very stable."
"The most valuable features of the F5 Advanced WAF are the enhanced ASM and the performance. Additionally, the usability and effectiveness are very good."
"The web application firewall itself is most valuable. It provides positive security and negative security. In negative security, it blocks a task such as cross-site scripting, code injection, etc. In positive security, it lets you specify and enforce things, such as the parameters allowed in username and password fields and the number of characters allowed in a field."
"Very easy to implement and works well."
"The valuable features vary from customers to customers. Some customers are okay with the basic features of the WAF, and some customers use advanced WAF with a few other features."
"We use Indusface AppTrana as a firewall."
"The Sandbox integration feature could be improved."
"The reporting portion of F5 Advance WAF is not great. They need to work out something better, as it is very basic. You only see the top IPs, I think there is more they can offer."
"The contextual-based component needs a lot of help to catch up with the next-gen products."
"The deployment side is quite complex."
"There is a gap in report management."
"The interface is old-looking, it's not modern, which is why it's not always comfortable to use."
"The solution's dashboard could be improved. When you're moving from policy to policy, the logs and the integration of the logs in other systems aren't straightforward."
"The overall price of F5 Advanced WAF could improve."
"The solution should add an enhanced dashboard to make it easy to navigate."
F5 Advanced WAF is ranked 3rd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 54 reviews while Indusface AppTrana is ranked 26th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. F5 Advanced WAF is rated 8.6, while Indusface AppTrana is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of F5 Advanced WAF writes "Flexible configuration, reliable, and highly professional support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Indusface AppTrana writes "Cost-effective and used as an effective firewall". F5 Advanced WAF is most compared with Fortinet FortiWeb, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, AWS WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), whereas Indusface AppTrana is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, AWS WAF, Akamai App and API Protector and Radware DefensePro.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
