What is your primary use case for Barracuda Web Application Firewall?

I am not using the API protection feature right now because I don't host any APIs through Barracuda Web Application Firewall. I use a second procedure for API, which is point-to-point VPN connectivity with the banks. I'm using their API, and they are using my APIs, so our connectivity is over point-to-point VPN. Therefore, that traffic does not go through Barracuda Web Application Firewall, which is why I'm not using API protection at this moment.

Our primary use case was to track the traffic on websites or webshops to identify potential malicious actors, such as bots. This involved analyzing the type of data being collected through websites to detect possible DDoS attacks.

I use Barracuda Web Application Firewall mainly for web application protection. I have worked with Barracuda for six years, focusing on this specific product, which aligns with my company's and clients' security needs.

I'm using Barracuda as a web application firewall for any application. It is too smart and user-friendly, making it easy to restrict applications and utilize many features.

Our clients primarily use Barracuda Web Application Firewall to filter their web traffic and ensure they are secure enough to protect their cybersecurity workloads.

I use the solution in my company to protect our website.

My company uses the tool for HTTP protection and the protection of HTTP for a particular application that is exposed to the internet. The product offers both the deployment models, which include the cloud and Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service.

Our customers use it to enhance the security parameters of their web applications. Web Application Firewalls serve this exact purpose.

We use the solution to protect our internal applications from cybersecurity threats.

People who host their applications on the cloud, global servers, on-premises, or various locations may encounter issues related to IT threading as well as volumetric attacks. To address these challenges, we provide the Barracuda Web Application Firewall. The most significant advantage of the Barracuda Web Application Firewall is that it offers a single subscription for Active DDoS protection. There are two types of DDoS attacks: active DDoS and offline DDoS. With Barracuda Web Application Firewall, we only need one subscription to be protected against both. In contrast, other solutions and competitors often require separate subscriptions for DDoS protection, making their offerings more expensive. When it comes to a comprehensive web application firewall solution, Barracuda stands out by providing an affordable and end-to-end approach. In comparison, other market solutions typically consist of separate boxes for different features, leading to higher pricing.

Our primary use case is for banking compliance. I'm a presales engineer.

Our primary use case is for web applications utilizing it primarily for DDoS and cross-site script protection.

We used Barracuda Web Application Firewall to protect the banking system. There were cyber drills where we had to find some logs, share those logs, and identify the attacks.

This solution is being used as a requirement for architect reference.

Our primary use case of this solution is protection of applications. If you have applications, for instance, in Azure, and you want to protect them, you can use Barracuda Web Application Firewall, and you have any input data available. This is one of the best use cases. For this solution, we have both cloud-based and VM for Azure.

We are using the Barracuda Web Application Firewall for website content and front-end web application protection.

We primarily use this solution for security purposes. We use it as a firewall.

Our clients are using the solution for internal banking software and website protection.

I primarily use the solution as a firewall.

Typically these web application firewalls act as an additional layer primarily for traffic. The web application firewalls are more of a safeguard if a company still has legacy technologies, for which they don't have the patches. It's basically used for the protection and security of web applications.

The solution is our WAF for Azure. It is for operation for Transit CAS applications.

We use Barracuda for all the cloud applications in Azure.

We use it for website and web service protection.

We primarily use the solution to secure most data centers. We also use it for mobile apps for malicious automated attacks.

In addition, Barracuda primary case for me is their support. Beautiful support.

We are system integrators and deplyed solution for a customer-small college, who wants to block web based intrusions and protect their other applications

We use this as public cloud and a virtual appliance based on Azure Cloud.

We use this solution as the firewall, the security, secure internet access, and protection from outside access.

I am a system integrator and this is one of the solutions that I implement for my customers.

We primarily use this solution for firewalls.

The primary use case is to protect from DDoS attacks and to protect my backend servers. That was the main concern for me. Barracuda has been very good. I'm very happy with the product.

The updating and signature features are my primary use case for the solution. These features are beneficial to my organization.

We use it for low balancing phase servers.

We use it for mail protection.

I have two primary use cases, one for a bank and the other one for an operator. I will speak about the bank case. The environment is very critical: securing an e-banking server and SMS banking.