No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Barracuda Application Protection vs Checkmarx One comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 11, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.0
Barracuda Application Protection cuts security incidents, saves time, improves response, boosts value tasks, and enhances customer engagement.
Sentiment score
5.6
Checkmarx One enhances security by automating vulnerability detection, reducing costs, and improving development efficiency through CI/CD integration.
Within the first six months of deployment, we have seen a 60% reduction in security incidents affecting the web application, which directly translated into fewer service interruptions and less time spent on incident response.
Senior Data Engineer at LTI LATAM and Toubro Improtech
Web-related alert triage time has reduced by around 40%, and some investigations that earlier took 30 minutes now take closer to 10 to 15 minutes.
Manager at Cyvogenix
Ease of use for our security team to be able to use templates and configure to our specs, combined with its high-level security protection features such as DOD-level protection, shows its readiness to secure our data and network lines, which is brilliant.
Web Developer at Clarivate
Overall, between the fast scanning, automation, automatic reporting, and easy detection, it has reduced manual effort enough that we did not need an extra reviewer, even as our codebase or team size grew.
Senior GenAI Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Based on my interactions with the clients, I can tell that there is a return on investment because if something is not profitable and it's not helping to save costs or vulnerabilities, clients wouldn't come back to renew their license year after year.
Chief Technology Officer at 3CS Aquarah Limited
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.6
Barracuda Application Protection offers highly rated, responsive support with 24/7 availability, praised for quick issue resolution and professionalism.
Sentiment score
7.0
Checkmarx One support is praised for quick responses and knowledgeable staff, despite some reporting delays in technical support.
The support team was responsive and technically knowledgeable, especially when handling application security or traffic-related issues.
Manager at Cyvogenix
The customer support for Barracuda Application Protection has been very responsive and helpful in resolving all our issues on time.
Senior Data Engineer at LTI LATAM and Toubro Improtech
My experience with Barracuda Application Protection's customer support is good, as they are very responsive, knowledgeable, and provide timely assistance for configuration, troubleshooting, and documentation.
Senior Engineer 3 at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
If you raise a support case with Checkmarx, it is handled smoothly.
Senior Specialist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
The customer support team is amazing and they provide on-phone call, email support, and on-website support.
Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution
I have relied on Checkmarx One customer support hundreds of times for several things, and Checkmarx One support is very proactive and very responsive.
Chief Technology Officer at 3CS Aquarah Limited
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Barracuda Application Protection efficiently scales across various environments, ensuring seamless traffic management and security, adapting to growth and seasonal spikes.
Sentiment score
7.0
Checkmarx One is scalable for large workloads, but some users report challenges with configurations and licensing requirements.
The platform supports cloud, on-premises, hybrid, containerized deployments, load balancing, CDN capabilities, and multi-environment protection, which helps when applications expand.
Manager at Cyvogenix
Barracuda Application Protection is easy to scale by adding protection to newer applications and APIs without major changes.
Senior Engineer 3 at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Approximately four billion lines of code are being scanned monthly.
Cyber Security Expert at Nestle
Since it is cloud-based, the infrastructure and PaaS, IaaS, and SaaS are taken care of by the cloud marketplace.
Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution
Checkmarx One's scalability has changed my organization because the strong collaboration between the development and security team helps us to do things much faster.
Senior GenAI Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.8
Barracuda Application Protection is stable and reliable, offering high availability, smooth performance, and minimal downtime in various environments.
Sentiment score
7.3
Checkmarx One is generally stable but faces issues with large codebases, memory use, and session inconsistencies.
Barracuda Application Protection has been stable and reliable in our experience.
Manager at Cyvogenix
Barracuda Application Protection is stable, as in my experience, it has been quite stable without any major outages or performance issues.
Senior Engineer 3 at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
I would rate the stability of this solution a nine on a scale of 1 to 10 where one is low stability and 10 is high.
Specialist Leader at Deloitte
Checkmarx One is often down when the cloud provider experiences issues.
Cyber Security Expert at Nestle
 

Room For Improvement

Barracuda Application Protection requires improvements in customization, onboarding, security features, and ease of use for complex environments.
Checkmarx One needs enhancements in accuracy, speed, integration, UI, support, pricing, and features for enterprise usability.
There is also some scope for improvement in API security visibility, especially around detailed discovery and classification of APIs, as this is becoming a critical area for modern applications.
Technical Team Lead - Content Security at Valuepoint Systems
I would add that they need to work really hard on false positives because most of the time it blocks legitimate API calls and disturbs their own ruling and everything which I have to work on manually.
Systems & Cloud Architect at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
Having the advanced ability to close off ports when they could be getting tested from hackers for intrusion would be helpful.
Web Developer at Clarivate
Integration into the IDE being used would be beneficial so that code does not need to be uploaded to the website and an IDE-friendly report could be generated.
Senior Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
It could suggest how the code base is written and automatically populate the source code with three different solution options to choose from.
Specialist Leader at Deloitte
If you can improve the speed optimization, it takes around 30 to 40 minutes for checking a build. If you can make it within five minutes or 10 minutes, that would be great.
Senior Software Engineer at Tech Mahindra Limited
 

Setup Cost

Barracuda Application Protection is cost-effective with flexible options, efficient security, and requires careful planning for optimal value.
Checkmarx One is often costly but provides quality and security, with costs varying by team size and selected modules.
The cost is relevant, pocket-friendly, and cost-effective.
Senior Data Engineer at LTI LATAM and Toubro Improtech
Cost saving is one of the major points observed since this product is less costly compared to others.
Tech Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
It is not the cheapest option, but it offers good value when considering the combined security features such as WAF, bot protection, DDoS defense, and centralized management.
Manager at Cyvogenix
For a small team under 50 developers, normal expenses come under 30 to 60K.
Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution
Due to the number of years I've implemented Checkmarx One, there are rebates and discounts from the OEM which makes it a lot more profitable.
Chief Technology Officer at 3CS Aquarah Limited
The pricing should be reasonable, matching what we are paying for.
Senior GenAI Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
 

Valuable Features

Barracuda Application Protection offers comprehensive security with firewall, API security, DDoS protection, and adaptability across cloud environments.
Checkmarx One offers comprehensive vulnerability scanning, seamless CI/CD integration, and enhances productivity with ease of use and automation.
Within the first six to seven months of deployment, I saw a 60% reduction in security incidents, incidents affecting the web application which directly translated into fewer service interruptions and less time spent on incident response.
Web Developer at Clarivate
Its WAF capabilities for OWASP Top 10 protection are very strong.
Technical Team Lead - Content Security at Valuepoint Systems
Barracuda Application Protection protects against ransomware, achieving a 67% protection rate because it is based on a Linux system, reducing the chances of encryption and providing strong ransomware protection.
Network Engineer at Cronic Technologies
Since replacing the previous tool, SAST and SCA scans are conducted in a couple of minutes instead of hours or days.
Cyber Security Expert at Nestle
The best features Checkmarx One offers, over the past years, include broad language and technical support that Checkmarx provides, covering most languages.
Senior Specialist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Checkmarx One has positively impacted our organization as we tend to find vulnerabilities very early in the development cycle.
Product security engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Barracuda Application Prote...
Ranking in API Security
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Checkmarx One
Ranking in API Security
4th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (2nd), Vulnerability Management (12th), Container Security (14th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (2nd), DevSecOps (3rd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (10th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (3rd), AI Security (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the API Security category, the mindshare of Barracuda Application Protection is 2.1%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Checkmarx One is 7.1%, up from 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Security Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Checkmarx One7.1%
Barracuda Application Protection2.1%
Other90.8%
API Security
 

Featured Reviews

Salbu Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager at Cyvogenix
Application protection has strengthened web security and reduces manual effort for critical services
One area where Barracuda Application Protection could be improved is reporting customization. The dashboards are useful, but more flexible executive-level and technical reporting options would help different teams. Another area is policy tuning for complex applications. While the platform is strong overall, some advanced environments need extra fine-tuning to reduce false positives or adapt custom rules. Deeper integrations with third-party CM and DevSecOps workflows would streamline operations further. Overall, it is a solid platform, but more customization and smoother advanced tuning would make it even better. A simpler onboarding experience for new administrators would be beneficial. The platform has many strong features, but teams without deep WAF experience may need time to become fully comfortable with advanced settings. More AI-driven recommendations for rule tuning, anomaly prioritization, and false positive reduction would help smaller teams operate more efficiently. Another area is pricing flexibility for growing organizations or mid-sized businesses. Overall, the product is strong, but easier management and smarter automation would make it even more attractive.
Shahzad Shahzad - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution
Enable secure development workflows while identifying opportunities for faster scans and improved AI guidance
Checkmarx One is a very strong platform, but there are several areas where it can improve to support modern DevSecOps workflows even better. For example, better real-time developer guidance is needed. The IDE plugin should offer richer AI-powered auto-fixes similar to SNYK Code or GitHub Copilot Security, as current guidance is good but not deeply contextual for large-scale enterprise codebases. This matters because it reduces developer friction and accelerates shift-left adoption. More transparency control over the correlation engines is another need. The correlation engine is powerful but not fully transparent. Users want to understand why vulnerabilities were correlated or de-prioritized, which helps AppSec teams trust the prioritization logic. Faster SAST scan and more language coverage is needed since SAST scan can still be slow for very large mono-repos and there is limited deep support for new language frameworks like Rust and Go, along with advanced coverage for serverless-specific frameworks. This matters because large organizations want sub-minute scans in CI/CD as cloud-native ecosystems evolve fast. A strong API security module is another area for enhancement. API security scanning could be improved with active testing, API discovery, full Swagger, OpenAPI, drift detection, and schema-based fuzzing. This is important as API attacks are one of the biggest AppSec risks in 2025. Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context. The IDE plugin could offer more AI-assisted fixes, and the SBOM lifecycle tracking can evolve further. Enhancing integration with SIEM and SOAR would also make enterprise adoption smoother, and these improvements would help developers and AppSec teams move faster with more accuracy.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Security solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
26%
Transportation Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Outsourcing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise26
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business32
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise46
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Barracuda Application Protection?
My overall experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Barracuda Application Protection is fairly positive, as I feel the pricing is very competitive compared to similar web applicati...
What needs improvement with Barracuda Application Protection?
Barracuda Application Protection can be improved as it still has a lot of false positives in learning mode and complex tuning is needed sometimes. Their support can be slow in critical situations. ...
What is your primary use case for Barracuda Application Protection?
My main use case for Barracuda Application Protection is that we put this in front of our web apps, normally in cloud and sometimes in on-premises to filter traffic. A quick specific example of an ...
What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?
I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.
What is the biggest difference between Veracode and Checkmarx?
According to my experience of using both the tools in different organizations Veracode is a Cloud-native, managed AppSec platform with strong focus on ease of use, it is SaaS delivery, and provide...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?
Checkmarx One is a premium solution, so budget accordingly. Make sure you understand how licensing scales with additional applications and users. I advise negotiating multi-year contracts or bundle...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC
Find out what your peers are saying about Barracuda Application Protection vs. Checkmarx One and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.