Barracuda Application Protection vs Seeker Interactive comparison

Barracuda Networks and Black Duck are both solutions in the API Security category. Barracuda Networks is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.1, while Black Duck is ranked #19. Barracuda Networks holds a 2.1% mindshare in APIS, compared to Black Duck’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Barracuda Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Black Duck users who would recommend it.

Barracuda Application Prote...

Read 9 Barracuda Application Protection reviews

649 Views
649 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Seeker Interactive

Read 1 Seeker Interactive review

1,207 Views
350 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Barracuda Application Prote...

Seeker Interactive

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 22, 2026

Seeker Interactive and Barracuda Application Protection are both in the cybersecurity solutions category. Barracuda Application Protection seems to have the upper hand due to its superior features and comprehensive protection.

Features: Seeker Interactive offers real-time vulnerability detection, comprehensive reporting, and competitive security testing. Barracuda Application Protection provides robust web application security, advanced threat protection, and automated threat monitoring, which covers a more extensive range of security requirements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Seeker Interactive supports a swift deployment process with responsive customer service. Barracuda Application Protection, while taking longer for setup, offers extensive resources and expert personnel for support.

Pricing and ROI: Seeker Interactive has lower setup costs ensuring a satisfactory return on investment within its service scope. Barracuda Application Protection, despite its higher initial costs, offers greater ROI for businesses needing expansive protection solutions due to its comprehensive security measures and long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed API Security Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

API Security

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 899,204 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Barracuda Application Prote...

Ranking in API Security

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Seeker Interactive

Ranking in API Security

19th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Internet Security (15th), Mobile Threat Defense (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the API Security category, the mindshare of Barracuda Application Protection is 2.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seeker Interactive is 2.3%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Security Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Barracuda Application Protection	2.1%
Seeker Interactive	2.3%
Other	95.6%

API Security

Featured Reviews

Salbu Kumar

Manager at Cyvogenix

Application protection has strengthened web security and reduces manual effort for critical services

One area where Barracuda Application Protection could be improved is reporting customization. The dashboards are useful, but more flexible executive-level and technical reporting options would help different teams. Another area is policy tuning for complex applications. While the platform is strong overall, some advanced environments need extra fine-tuning to reduce false positives or adapt custom rules. Deeper integrations with third-party CM and DevSecOps workflows would streamline operations further. Overall, it is a solid platform, but more customization and smoother advanced tuning would make it even better. A simpler onboarding experience for new administrators would be beneficial. The platform has many strong features, but teams without deep WAF experience may need time to become fully comfortable with advanced settings. More AI-driven recommendations for rule tuning, anomaly prioritization, and false positive reduction would help smaller teams operate more efficiently. Another area is pricing flexibility for growing organizations or mid-sized businesses. Overall, the product is strong, but easier management and smarter automation would make it even more attractive.

Read full review

San K

Senior Group Leader at Infosys

More effective than dynamic scanners, but is missing useful learning capabilities

One area that Seeker can improve is to make it more customizable. All security scanning tools have a defined set of rules that are based on certain criteria which they will use to detect issues. However, the criteria that you set initially is not something that all applications are going to need. The purposes for which applications are designed may differ in practice in the industry, and because of this, there will always be tools that sometimes report false positives. Thus, there should be some means with which I can customize the way that Seeker learns about our applications, possibly by using some kind of AI / ML capability within the tool that will automatically reduce the number of false positives that we get as we use the tool over time. Obviously, when we first start using the scanning tool there will be false positives, but as it keeps going and as I keep using the tool, there should be a period of time where either the application can learn how to ignore false positives, or I can customize it do so. Adding this type of functionality would definitely prevent future issues when it comes to reporting false positives, and this is a key area that we have already asked the vendor to improve on, in general. On a different note, there is one feature that isn't completely available right now where you can integrate Seeker with an open-source vulnerability scanner or composition analysis tool such as Black Duck. I would very much like this capability to be available to us out-of-the-box, so that we can easily integrate with tools like Black Duck in such a way that any open source components that are used in the front-end are easily identified. I think this would be a huge plus for Seeker. Another feature within Seeker which could benefit from improvement is active verification, which lets you actively verify a vulnerability. This feature currently doesn't work in certain applications, particularly in scenarios where you have requested tokens. When we bought the tool, we didn't realize this and we were not told about it by the vendor, so initially it was a big challenge for us to overcome it and properly begin our deployment.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Barracuda Application Protection has significantly improved security posture, reducing the attack surface using WAF plus API protection, automating threats with machine learning-based bot protections, providing zero-trust access to applications, and helping detect and mitigate threats in real-time, resulting in a 50 to 60% reduction in security incidents after deployment."

"Barracuda Application Protection has been a solid and dependable solution for protecting public-facing applications."

"Barracuda Application Protection has positively impacted my organization as it is used for multiple clients, and I am also backing up the Exchange servers, which frequently experience attacks in customer environments, allowing for quick restoration, even from yesterday or the day before yesterday."

"Barracuda Application Protection's best features are protecting APIs and defending against zero-day vulnerabilities."

"Within the first six months of deployment, we have seen a 60% reduction in security incidents affecting the web application, which directly translated into fewer service interruptions and less time spent on incident response."

"Barracuda Application Protection had a positive impact mainly in terms of improved visibility and better handling of automated attack traffic."

"Within the first six to seven months of deployment, I saw a 60% reduction in security incidents, incidents affecting the web application which directly translated into fewer service interruptions and less time spent on incident response."

"Barracuda Application Protection has positively impacted my organization by managing traffic well, enhancing access security, operational efficiency, and user experience, leading to customer satisfaction."

More Barracuda Application Protection pros

"A significant advantage of Seeker is that it is an interactive scanner, and we have found it to be much more effective in reducing the amount of false positives than dynamic scanners such as AppScan, Micro Focus Fortify, etc., and furthermore, with Seeker, we are finding more and more valid (i.e. "true") positives over time compared with the dynamic scanners."

Cons

"I do not have much to say about the improvement, but a more innovative solution for sniffing more on the network would be great, and having the advanced ability to close off ports when they could be getting tested from hackers for intrusion would be helpful."

"Improving the operating system structure, firmware, and overall performance would enhance loading times for devices."

"Barracuda Application Protection could be improved with a more user-friendly interface to enable all types of people to be able to use it, especially the less technical users."

"One area where Barracuda Application Protection can improve is in policy tuning and ease of configuration, especially for complex application and API-heavy environments."

"Another area is pricing flexibility for growing organizations or mid-sized businesses."

"The interface of Barracuda Application Protection is generally intuitive but can become complex for advanced configurations."

"The reporting functionality is quite poor in its current state."

"Additionally, I can say that deeper API security features such as automation, API discovery, scheme validations, and improved protections for modern environments are needed."

More Barracuda Application Protection cons

"All in all, the enterprise server installation is very easy and straightforward, but with the agent installation you might face problems up to 50% of the time for a variety of reasons, depending on what type of application is involved, the type of deployment used, and so on."

"One area that Seeker can improve is to make it more customizable. All security scanning tools have a defined set of rules that are based on certain criteria which they will use to detect issues. However, the criteria that you set initially is not something that all applications are going to need."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The licensing for Seeker is user-based and for 50 users I believe it costs about $70,000 per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

899,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Manufacturing Company

18%

Transportation Company

18%

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Government

18%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	25

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Barracuda Application Protection?

The experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Barracuda Application Protection is positive, though there is room for improvement.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Barracuda Application Protection?

When it comes to reporting and analytics by Barracuda Application Protection, I find it adequate, but the reporting is very data-based and requires you to import it into Power BI to generate your o...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Barracuda Application Protection?

Barracuda Application Protection is used to protect applications from SQL injection, API abuse, and bot attacks. It solves problems related to DDoS attacks, data leakage, and zero-day threats on a ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Operant AI vs Barracuda Application Protection

Compared 36% of the time

Invicti vs Barracuda Application Protection

Compared 33% of the time

Netacea Bot Management vs Barracuda Application Protection

Compared 20% of the time

More Barracuda Application Protection Competitors

CodeScan Static Code Analysis vs Seeker Interactive

Compared 16% of the time

Operant AI vs Seeker Interactive

Compared 13% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Seeker Interactive

Compared 11% of the time

SonarQube vs Seeker Interactive

Compared 10% of the time

More Seeker Interactive Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Barracuda Application Protection

June 2026

Download Barracuda Application Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

Internet Security

May 2026

Download Seeker Interactive product report

Overview

Barracuda Application Protection provides robust application security, delivering comprehensive protection tailored for IT professionals seeking advanced web security measures.

Barracuda Application Protection is designed to safeguard web applications against vulnerabilities and cyber threats. It offers a cutting-edge, integrated platform that ensures sophisticated security measures for future-proofing organizational IT infrastructure. With scalable solutions, it caters to diverse business needs and enhances overall security posture.

What are the key features of Barracuda Application Protection?

Comprehensive Web Application Firewall: Provides real-time defense against web threats.
Automated DDoS Protection: Protects against distributed denial-of-service attacks with automatic response capabilities.
Advanced Bot Protection: Identifies and mitigates automated bot attacks efficiently.
API Security: Offers robust security measures for API communications, preventing unauthorized access.

What benefits or ROI should users expect in reviews?

Enhanced Security: Users report significant improvements in application security with real-time threat detection.
Operational Efficiency: Automated protection features reduce manual interventions, saving time and resources.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing security requirements, supporting expansion plans.
Cost Savings: Decreases potential financial losses by preventing breaches.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and ecommerce, Barracuda Application Protection is implemented to strengthen security frameworks. It ensures sensitive data protection, compliance adherence, and reduces downtime, thereby supporting critical operations across sectors.

Barracuda Networks

Seeker®, interactive application security testing (IAST) solution, gives you unparalleled visibility into your modern web, cloud based and microservices based app security posture. It automatically verifies, prioritizes and reports on critical vulnerabilities in real time. It identifies vulnerability trends against compliance standards (e.g., OWASP Top 10, PCI DSS, GDPR, CAPEC, and CWE/SANS Top 25). Seeker enables security teams to identify and track sensitive data to ensure that it is handled securely and not stored in log files or databases with weak or no encryption. Seeker’s seamless integration into CI/CD workflows enables fast interactive application security testing at DevOps speed.

Black Duck

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

El Al Airlines and Société Française du Radiotelephone

Find out what your peers are saying about Imperva, Akamai, Orca Security and others in API Security. Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

899,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best API Security vendors.

We monitor all API Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.