No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Barracuda Application Protection vs Invicti comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 11, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Barracuda Application Prote...
Ranking in API Security
10th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Invicti
Ranking in API Security
9th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (10th), Container Security (25th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (8th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (4th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the API Security category, the mindshare of Barracuda Application Protection is 2.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Invicti is 3.8%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Security Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Invicti3.8%
Barracuda Application Protection2.1%
Other94.1%
API Security
 

Featured Reviews

Salbu Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager at Cyvogenix
Application protection has strengthened web security and reduces manual effort for critical services
One area where Barracuda Application Protection could be improved is reporting customization. The dashboards are useful, but more flexible executive-level and technical reporting options would help different teams. Another area is policy tuning for complex applications. While the platform is strong overall, some advanced environments need extra fine-tuning to reduce false positives or adapt custom rules. Deeper integrations with third-party CM and DevSecOps workflows would streamline operations further. Overall, it is a solid platform, but more customization and smoother advanced tuning would make it even better. A simpler onboarding experience for new administrators would be beneficial. The platform has many strong features, but teams without deep WAF experience may need time to become fully comfortable with advanced settings. More AI-driven recommendations for rule tuning, anomaly prioritization, and false positive reduction would help smaller teams operate more efficiently. Another area is pricing flexibility for growing organizations or mid-sized businesses. Overall, the product is strong, but easier management and smarter automation would make it even more attractive.
PrashantUppuluri - PeerSpot reviewer
Solution Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Automated scanning has strengthened web application security and supports hybrid protection
A good scanning engine is what I appreciate about Invicti. When you want to find out the vulnerabilities within your web applications, Invicti has done a thorough job with respect to filtering out the vulnerabilities and identifying the risk factors with respect to the security modules within the solution. Invicti does have a segment of the solution which works on the automated scanning engine. As long as the license is active, the scanners that work within the solution are pretty effective. With respect to SAST and DAST, being a real-time scanning engine is one of the portfolios and one of the selling factors of the solution. Invicti is known to be a solution that works within the hybrid environment, be it cloud, on-premises, or a mix and match across multiple marketplaces. It does a thorough job. Most importantly, Invicti is a very good SAST and DAST solution that is very competitive in the market with respect to competitors. Invicti is a part of the Magic Quadrant with respect to Gartner's Magic Quadrant and has made a very good customer database and pipeline within the marketplace locally. With respect to security impacts in terms of support, Invicti is pretty much supportive. With respect to use cases or the POCs I have run on the solution, we have identified a couple of vulnerabilities and Invicti was able to trace them, detect, and quarantine the attacks.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Barracuda Application Protection's best features are protecting APIs and defending against zero-day vulnerabilities."
"Barracuda Application Protection has been a solid and dependable solution for protecting public-facing applications."
"Barracuda Application Protection has positively impacted my organization as it is used for multiple clients, and I am also backing up the Exchange servers, which frequently experience attacks in customer environments, allowing for quick restoration, even from yesterday or the day before yesterday."
"Barracuda Application Protection has positively impacted my organization by managing traffic well, enhancing access security, operational efficiency, and user experience, leading to customer satisfaction."
"Barracuda Application Protection had a positive impact mainly in terms of improved visibility and better handling of automated attack traffic."
"Barracuda Application Protection has significantly improved security posture, reducing the attack surface using WAF plus API protection, automating threats with machine learning-based bot protections, providing zero-trust access to applications, and helping detect and mitigate threats in real-time, resulting in a 50 to 60% reduction in security incidents after deployment."
"I find the most valuable features of Barracuda Application Protection to be primarily the embedded AI, which makes our work significantly easier."
"Within the first six months of deployment, we have seen a 60% reduction in security incidents affecting the web application, which directly translated into fewer service interruptions and less time spent on incident response."
"The platform is stable."
"Netsparker offers some pretty features: Crawling feature: Netsparker has very detail crawling steps and mechanisms, this feature expands the attack surface, Attacking feature: Actually, attacking is not a solo feature, it contains many attack engines, Hawk, and many properties, but Netsparker's attacking mechanism is very flexible, this increases the vulnerability detection rate, also, Netsparker made the Hawk for real-time interactive command-line-based exploit testing, it's very valuable for a vulnerability scanner, and a very useful API for automating the scans."
"I would tell potential users that it's really one of the best products in the market for web application security or Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)."
"The most attractive feature was the reporting review tool. The reporting review was very impressive and produced very fruitful reports."
"High level of accuracy and quick scanning."
"One of the features I like about this program is the low number of false positives and the support it offers."
"I am impressed by the whole technology that they are using in this solution. It is really fast. When using netscan, the confirmation that it gives on the vulnerabilities is pretty cool. It is really easy to configure a scan in Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner. It is also really easy to deploy."
"We use simultaneous products, but I found this to be the best of the lot."
 

Cons

"One area where Barracuda Application Protection can improve is in policy tuning and ease of configuration, especially for complex application and API-heavy environments."
"Improving the operating system structure, firmware, and overall performance would enhance loading times for devices."
"The interface of Barracuda Application Protection is generally intuitive but can become complex for advanced configurations."
"My only concerns are that it is not very user-friendly and the response time is slow."
"I do not have much to say about the improvement, but a more innovative solution for sniffing more on the network would be great, and having the advanced ability to close off ports when they could be getting tested from hackers for intrusion would be helpful."
"Barracuda Application Protection could be improved with a more user-friendly interface to enable all types of people to be able to use it, especially the less technical users."
"Another area is pricing flexibility for growing organizations or mid-sized businesses."
"The reporting functionality is quite poor in its current state."
"Maybe supported clients can be improved. It still does not search vulnerabilities in DB2 databases, for example."
"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. The licensing is tied to the URL, and it's restricted."
"It is a good tool, as we found out with the Community Edition trial, but the price point is quite expensive for a startup or average-sized company."
"When scanning a large web-based application, it tends to process slow and takes a long time especially on crawling and attacking part."
"Sometimes, it is slow; when we are running this application and browsing other applications concurrently, it makes other applications work slow."
"Currently, there is nothing I would like to improve."
"Maybe the ability to make a good reporting format is needed."
"They could enhance the support for data swap testing for the platform."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"OWASP Zap is free and it has live updates, so that's a big plus."
"It is competitive in the security market."
"We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."
"We never had any issues with the licensing; the price was within our assigned limits."
"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."
"The price should be 20% lower"
"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."
"I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Security solutions are best for your needs.
899,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Manufacturing Company
18%
Transportation Company
18%
Construction Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
7%
Construction Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise25
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise13
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Barracuda Application Protection?
The experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Barracuda Application Protection is positive, though there is room for improvement.
What needs improvement with Barracuda Application Protection?
When it comes to reporting and analytics by Barracuda Application Protection, I find it adequate, but the reporting is very data-based and requires you to import it into Power BI to generate your o...
What is your primary use case for Barracuda Application Protection?
Barracuda Application Protection is used to protect applications from SQL injection, API abuse, and bot attacks. It solves problems related to DDoS attacks, data leakage, and zero-day threats on a ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?
The setup cost is pretty competitive. For example, if you want to talk about the SAST license, it comes to about $150 or sometimes less than $100, depending on the conversion or the number of licen...
What needs improvement with Invicti?
At this time, there is nothing that comes to mind. However, most of the products in the market are pretty much neck-to-neck competitors. Speaking about it, there are a couple of factors which they ...
What is your primary use case for Invicti?
I have worked on a couple of products, specifically in web application security. I have worked on Invicti, and with respect to PAM, I have worked with BeyondTrust. I have not worked specifically fo...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Netsparker
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Barracuda Application Protection vs. Invicti and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
899,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.