Azure Network Watcher vs Opsview comparison

Microsoft and ITRS are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Microsoft is ranked #46 with an average rating of 8.0, while ITRS is ranked #44 with an average rating of 8.0. Microsoft holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to ITRS’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ITRS users who would recommend it.

Azure Network Watcher

Read 13 Azure Network Watcher reviews

2,224 Views
2,157 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Opsview

Read 25 Opsview reviews

5,615 Views
3,874 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Network Watcher

Opsview

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Opsview and Azure Network Watcher compete in the network and infrastructure monitoring category. Azure Network Watcher has the upper hand due to its advanced cloud network diagnostics and feature set, despite higher costs.

Features: Opsview provides comprehensive infrastructure monitoring, alerting, and reporting, suitable for diverse IT environments. It offers flexible support and robust capabilities across various platforms. Azure Network Watcher's deep integration with Azure services enhances network diagnostics, troubleshooting, and cloud operation efficiency. It is tailored for cloud-focused operations with extensive Azure service compatibility.

Room for Improvement: Opsview could enhance its cloud-specific features and integration with cloud-native tools. Increasing user interface intuitiveness and expanding its range of pre-configured templates for monitoring would be beneficial. Azure Network Watcher could improve user experience for non-cloud environments, optimize costs, and expand its feature set to better serve hybrid setups.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Opsview offers a straightforward deployment and adapts well to various IT infrastructures, coupled with comprehensive support. Azure Network Watcher, integrated within the Azure ecosystem, streamlines cloud operation setups but may be challenging for non-cloud environments due to its focus on Azure-specific functionalities.

Pricing and ROI: Opsview's setup costs are generally competitive, offering clear ROI due to flexibility across different infrastructures. Azure Network Watcher's higher initial costs are justified by its extensive service integration with potential long-term ROI for Azure-centric businesses. Opsview is cost-effective for hybrid environments, while Azure Network Watcher benefits those heavily invested in Azure services.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Network Watcher vs. Opsview Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Network Watcher vs. Opsview

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 910,005 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Network Watcher

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

46th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Opsview

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

44th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (21st), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (33rd), Cloud Monitoring Software (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Azure Network Watcher is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Opsview is 1.0%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Opsview	1.0%
Azure Network Watcher	0.5%
Other	98.5%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Bijoyendra Roychowdhury

Program Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Network monitoring provides comprehensive analytics while the interface requires further development

The quality of Azure Network Watcher is quite good in terms of the in-depth analysis you can create from these matrices. There are other monitoring tools such as New Relic, AppDynamics, and Dynatrace which provide very detailed network tracing. Cloud providers such as Azure or AWS do not have that kind of GUI-based capability at this point, but using PowerShell or Python, you can develop it yourself. From the GUI perspective, it still needs to evolve in terms of quality and standard, though overall, it is quite good for troubleshooting. Regarding areas for improvement, when comparing to other network tools beyond Azure Monitor or Azure Network Watcher, those tools can identify single failed packets. This level of granularity is not currently possible with cloud providers as they only go to a certain level rather than the granular level needed for deep troubleshooting, though they do provide hints with available matrices.

Read full review

reviewer1898607

Partner Technical Support & Escalation Manager at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Real-time dashboards have improved our deployment monitoring and incident response

We are using Opsview ourselves, rather than being a consultant or a reseller. We do not use its auto-discovery feature. We do not utilize its API driven architecture. I do not know what metrics we use to assess the effectiveness of Opsview's hybrid IT monitoring. Overall, I am pretty satisfied with Opsview as it is good for what it does. I do not know if Grafana has any other advantages besides better stats, as I am not involved in that side. Based on my experience, I would still recommend Opsview to others as it is good for what it does. I gave this review a rating of 8.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use the solution to monitor network services. It helps to capture any network issues."

"It provides good visibility."

"The solution is stable, there are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze, it's reliable."

"My advice to others looking into using Azure Network Watcher is to go for it, as you'll have the tool by default when you're subscribed to Azure VNet."

"What I like most about Azure Network Watcher is that it's focused more on the architecture. I also like that it has a packet capture feature that tells you how the packet travels and whether it's exiting Azure, etc."

"I like the visibility."

"This will help the company or the administrator, by helping them see how the traffic moves, to make sure that no entities are having any communication issues or different endpoints with task issues."

"The most valuable features I have found are typology, visualization, and capture."

More Azure Network Watcher pros

"Opsview, though not the least expensive Nagios-based commercial monitoring product offers excellent value for performance which rivals expensive commercial products from the major IT vendors; it is well worth the money paid for it."

"With the monitoring capabilities, I can tell when things happen and be proactive about them instead of constantly putting out fires."

"Afterwards, they were impressed by how easy monitoring could be, and they no longer had to edit large text files in order to configure hosts and service checks."

"For me, scalability and reliability are the product's most valuable features."

"Opsview provides all the functionality of NetSaint and Nagios but with the simplicity of a GUI front end, using MySQL to centralize configuration."

"It's a good solution. It covers all aspects of monitoring purposes."

"Excellent customer support from Cerner."

"The system is very robust and very rarely breaks."

More Opsview pros

Cons

"The solution could improve by limiting the need to clarify the logs. When the clarification is minimized, it is better for everyone involved."

"Azure Network Watcher needs to have better documentation and it needs to capture information accurately."

"Sometimes, you encounter a VPN tunnel, network, or routing issue, but finding out more about the blockage is challenging."

"The solution could use some additional components of the network culture, not only VMs. I'd like to see some additional security features because what they currently have concentrates only on the network."

"I still use Wireshark and Azure Network Watcher to get the required data. My team captures the traffic from Azure Network Watcher, downloads it, then imports that traffic into Wireshark to get more details on the number of hits and replies, for example. If you can do that on Azure Network Watcher and have Wireshark built-in, that would make Azure Network Watcher better. If Azure Network Watcher has that functionality where you won't need a third-party tool to get what you need, that would be helpful. I'm also expecting more from Azure Network Watcher. It's more complex than knowing how the IP flows from its source to the destination. The tool also needs more open-source features, such as having some built-in Wireshark that improves monitoring for customers. Sometimes, you encounter a VPN tunnel, network, or routing issue, but finding out more about the blockage is challenging. Is it one hundred percent an Azure issue? Is it a peer issue? You don't get complete information from Azure Network Watcher, so you must use other tools and depend on your strategies to resolve a specific issue. If more features could be added in the next release of Azure Network Watcher, specifically ones you can find on open-source tools, then that would be a plus point for the tool."

"I would like to see in the future if we can troubleshoot as a firewall because it is equipment as a network player and some diagnostics."

"The initial setup and initial learning curve could be improved to be easier."

"There are some occasional downtimes, but these were based on Azure-specific issues."

More Azure Network Watcher cons

"Sometimes Opsview has crashed, but the multiple master/slave solution provides consistent uptime for monitoring."

"Reload time: Although there have been major gains in the time to process reloads, I think that there is still room for improvement in this area."

"Maybe the graphical representation can be improved. It can be enhanced for better visualization. It could be a little better. And the graph center can be improved."

"Pricing and a few certain aspects in the solution needs to be improved."

"It's probably the priciest option of all its main competitors."

"Large Opsview setups come with high licensing fees."

"Customized reporting can be improved."

"Some aspects of the GUI functionality need improvement."

More Opsview cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is good. It's not too expensive."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"Azure Network Watcher is a little bit expensive."

"Price-wise, I have no information on how much Azure Network Watcher costs."

"I would rate pricing a seven out of ten, where ten is the highest price."

"The solution is priced similarly to other tools offering similar features."

"The solution is not cheap. I think that the pricing is a little bit on the high side."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

910,005 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Construction Company

13%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Network Watcher?

I do not have the exact setup cost information on hand, but it is available in the public Azure portal. You can access the calculator there to get detailed pricing information.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Network Watcher?

The main area for improvement is AI-based features. Currently, many intelligent tools are coming from third parties, and Azure Network Watcher needs to improve in this area. The focus should be on ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Network Watcher?

Azure Network Watcher is used for monitoring network traffic. It provides insight into egress and ingress traffic, which helps determine whether consumption can be controlled. Most Azure services c...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Opsview Monitor?

There is always room for improvement, and part of the reason we're looking at Grafana is because there are things it can do that Opsview cannot do as well. Grafana does have features that I think m...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Opsview Monitor?

Our primary use case is monitoring our deployments.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Opsview Monitor?

See all answers

Comparisons

Nmap vs Azure Network Watcher

Compared 14% of the time

Kentik vs Azure Network Watcher

Compared 13% of the time

Ixia Network Taps vs Azure Network Watcher

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Network Monitor vs Azure Network Watcher

Compared 7% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Azure Network Watcher

Compared 7% of the time

More Azure Network Watcher Competitors

Nagios XI vs Opsview

Compared 10% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Opsview

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs Opsview

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Opsview

Compared 6% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Opsview

Compared 6% of the time

More Opsview Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Network Watcher

August 2026

Download Azure Network Watcher product report

Buyer's Guide

Opsview

August 2026

Download Opsview product report

Also Known As

No data available

Opsview Monitor, Opsview Enterprise

Overview

Azure Network Watcher provides advanced network monitoring capabilities including packet capture, cloud-native firewall, and traffic diagnosis, aiding in VPN troubleshooting and security enforcement with enhanced visibility and alerting features.

Azure Network Watcher is essential for monitoring, diagnosing, and analyzing network traffic. It efficiently handles VPN connection issues and enhances network security by capturing and analyzing traffic to assess performance or latency problems. The tool facilitates traffic flow control, security rule verification, and bandwidth monitoring. Users benefit from its capabilities in diagnosing service connections, offering insights into network activity, and identifying potential threats, crucial for maintaining compliance and efficient network management.

What are the key features of Azure Network Watcher?

Packet Capture: Enables detailed network traffic inspection to troubleshoot issues.
Cloud-Native Application Firewall: Provides enhanced protection for applications running in the cloud.
Traffic Monitoring: Allows for real-time analysis and troubleshooting of network traffic.
NSG Flow Logs & AI-Based Monitoring: Enhances flow control and threat detection.
Alerting & Threshold Configuration: Offers customizable alerts via Azure Monitor for proactive management.

What benefits can users look for in reviews?

Improved Network Security: Helps in identifying and mitigating threats efficiently.
Enhanced Visibility: Provides clear insights into network operations and potential issues.
Compliance Support: Assists in maintaining regulatory compliance with thorough monitoring capabilities.
Effective Bandwidth Management: Facilitates control and optimization of network bandwidth.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Azure Network Watcher is implemented to ensure robust security and compliance, crucial for safeguarding sensitive data. It aids retail and manufacturing sectors in optimizing network performance and maintaining seamless connectivity, supporting their digital infrastructure needs.

Microsoft

Opsview provides advanced monitoring for system availability, service metrics, and resource usage with flexibility and scalability tailored for global networks.

Opsview delivers comprehensive monitoring through its flexible alert framework, web GUI, and integration with Nagios plugins. It facilitates seamless server additions, supports multi-tenancy, and offers scalability with a MySQL backend. Configuring new hosts and services is straightforward, while advanced services like cloning and alert noise reduction enhance user experience. Users mention room for improvement in the API, database support, and features like bulk changes in the GUI. Despite these aspects, Opsview is preferred for cloud and client monitoring across multiple geographical points.

What are Opsview's most important features?

Flexible Alert Framework: Allows customized alerting rules to suit diverse needs.
Web GUI and Dashboard: Intuitive interfaces for real-time monitoring and data visualization.
Integration with Nagios: Compatible with a wide range of plugins for extended functionality.
Multi-Tenancy: Supports multiple users with isolated data views.
API and Automation: Streamlines management and operational workflows.
Distributed Monitoring: Ensures reliable performance across global networks.

What benefits or ROI are users experiencing?

Scalability: Adapts to growing infrastructure with ease.
Ease of Configuration: Simplifying initial setup and ongoing adjustments.
Accurate Alerting: Reduces false positives, improving response efficiency.
System Stability: Consistent performance with minimal downtime.
Comprehensive Support: Extensive integration and customization options.

Opsview proves valuable in cloud environments for monitoring resource availability and performance. Organizations deploy it for both internal and client-facing monitoring across global regions, benefiting from enhanced event triggers and automation opportunities, particularly in deployment monitoring and service tracking.

ITRS

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

IBM, BT, Cisco, Sky, UPS, Capgemini, Visolit, Fujitsu Services UK, UKCloud, Massachusetts Insitute of Technology, Cornell University, Incomm

Buyer's Guide

Azure Network Watcher vs. Opsview

August 2026

Free Report: Azure Network Watcher vs. Opsview

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Network Watcher vs. Opsview and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

910,005 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Network Watcher vs. Opsview report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.