Azure Key Vault vs JumpCloud comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

iboss
Sponsored
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (23rd), Internet Security (8th), Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) (11th), ZTNA as a Service (14th), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (15th)
Azure Key Vault
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Password Managers (1st), Certificate Management Software (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (12th)
JumpCloud
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
Single Sign-On (SSO) (8th), Identity Management (IM) (9th), Enterprise Password Managers (7th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (6th), ZTNA as a Service (10th), Active Directory Bridge (2nd)
 

Featured Reviews

GZ
Sep 25, 2021
Stable and quick to set up but needs more clear status information for end users
The solution is a corporate proxy server, an intelligence proxy From a corporate perspective, I understand that it's important to keep the company data safe. From a corporate point of view, it's a good solution. The solution is stable. The solution can scale.  It was a very easy product to…
Erick Oliveira Da Silva - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 12, 2023
Easy to deploy, and scale, and is user-friendly
We use the Azure Key Vault to encrypt and to get our secrets such as passwords and connection strings The use of Azure Key Vault is vital to the security of our organization. Here we store our credentials, secrets, tokens, connection strings, and any other information needed to access external…
Oscar Iván Mejía - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 14, 2023
Great synchronization and single sign on functionalities but can be a bit complex to set up
We primarily use the solution for synchronization.  This product has helped us to synchronize all of our accounts in Google Workspace with Microsoft 365. The single sign-on makes it very easy to access.  It offers great synchronization functionalities.  The solution is stable. It is scalable. We…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Iboss is a solution that prevents advanced persistent threats, and has a zero tolerance for attacks."
"Our primary use case for this product is DLP,"
"Valuable features: Within the filter: Controls (Web categories, applications, and Allow/Block list) and Network (local Subnets). Within the reporter: Logs (Event Log) and Reports."
"Its initial setup was straightforward."
"It was a very easy product to install. It can be deployed very fast."
"Content filtering is the most useful feature of iboss."
"The security aspect of the solution, particularly the malware behind it, is excellent. That's something that really helped us out. It's not just a simple proxy that just blocks the insights of potential threats that come on behind it. They do malware detection and that helps us a lot."
"Technical support is pretty sharp and very responsive."
"With Azure Key Vault, we can generate our own keys and then import them inside the system, which provides a higher level of security than provider-managed keys."
"It is a managed service in Azure, you do not have to worry about security other than managing your own identities."
"We only use the basic features and those are the ones that have the ability to tie into the app, the secrets, and the passwords and encrypt them."
"The platform provides straightforward integration with most of the other Azure services."
"There is advanced data protection available. We're working in a highly regulated environment, and this is essential to us."
"The solution's technical support is good. My company received support from Microsoft whenever we needed it."
"A high level of security."
"The most valuable feature of Azure Key Vault is the secret storage of data."
"I am impressed with the product's remote access which allows admins to control endpoints which is a timesaver."
"After deploying to the cloud, we had remote device management on all of our corporate laptops."
"The product enables device management."
"The UI is intuitively easy to use. It is easy to set up a user. I have found the group management to be pretty simple. You can group users, then assign them to groups of systems, and that relationship allows us to ease the management burden."
"The solution is stable."
"Ability to integrate all applications."
"Some of the most valuable features of Jumpcloud have been the use of the policies. They have been very helpful. There are modules in there for policies where you can create your own which indirectly are GPOs similar to what you have for Microsoft environments, however, they are only doing registry changes. They are very powerful and useful. Additionally, having your directory and SSO in one spot is another thing that they provide in application management. Adding, removing, and updating applications are in one place for desktop administration."
"The usual authentication and authorization, which were all controlled into one portal, are very convenient."
 

Cons

"Its pricing could be better."
"Sometimes, obviously, there are bugs."
"To scale up, a new iboss Node Blade Chassis must be purchased."
"The solution could be stronger on the integration side and offer more cloud applications like G Suite or Oracle."
"SSL decryption: We had issues with learners using apps instead of using web browsers. This type of encryption is tough for any appliance in a BYOD environment."
"Iboss is growing so fast that it is often hard for them to keep up with the challenges."
"File integrity monitoring would be very advantageous as an additional feature."
"The area I would like to see improvement in is the ability with in the reporter to navigate directly to the content the user is traversing. It is kind of there, but it's not perfect. Quite frequently, I receive links that lead me to pages with error messages."
"Currently, our company has to add the secrets manually, one by one, in Azure Key Vault, which is a tedious process."
"They should improve its policies, which sometimes reapplied but don't sync properly between the Key vault and the role-based access. When I put some roles on the user side, it sometimes misses the end data to secure."
"I would like more code examples."
"There's room for improvement in cross-platform compatibility."
"The slow response from the support team is one of the shortcomings of the solution that needs to be improved."
"The solution does not allow you to integrate with XML parties if it is not inside Azure itself."
"Sometimes it takes too long to retrieve the keys. The authentication process takes time."
"While it's very reliable in terms of stability, there's always room for improvement."
"The product needs to create its own self-service feature which has been requested by all the admins in the community."
"It could dip into CI/CD tooling as well. That would be a very interesting part to see."
"JumpCloud can improve in its synchronization of identities. More specifically, groups with Office 365. They've been working on it, but it's not where I would necessarily like it to be."
"They need more straightening of the SSO capabilities."
"Support is not good enough."
"JumpCloud could improve by providing more features. They are only giving the three standard features, such as SSO radius. I would like there to be multi-tenant features. For example, my colleague is from a different organization, and he's using different applications and I'm using different applications, I wanted to access his applications and database with my JumpCloud credentials. However, since it is a multi-tenant instance. I would like it to be open-ended where we can gather all these multi-level organizations to put in a single domain to access one authentication for all the different applications."
"I would like to see some support for printers, especially network printers, through the application."
"For improvement, the tool should introduce more customization options."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive compared to one of its competitors."
"Currently, the solution's pricing is based on the number of transactions, which is very high in some cases."
"The product is neither cheap nor expensive."
"I give the price of the solution a ten out of ten."
"Azure is cheaper than CyberArk... CyberArk is good, but it's quite expensive."
"The pricing is reasonable and flexible, especially for those already using Microsoft Azure Cloud services. There is a cost associated with retrieval and storage, which is a few dollars. Otherwise, the price can be customized according to requirements, such as how many keys need to be stored."
"I find the pricing of Azure Key Vault to be reasonable."
"Pricing is quite reasonable and support is included, although premium support is available for an additional fee."
"There are no extra costs beyond the standard fees, beyond maybe data transfer charges. It's $0.025 per 10,000 data transactions, so it is quite cheap."
"The pricing model changed about 18 months ago. It used to be that you got 10 users free, and then you paid for any user above 10 users. Now, when you go above 10 users, you pay for every user. It has become a bit more expensive, but it's such a good product. When you take into account Microsoft licenses, if you were to run Active Directory, you'd need a server to put it on, or you would need a couple of servers, backup, etc. It's a no-brainer. JumpCloud is so much easier to manage from my perspective, regardless of the cost increase. It's just brilliant."
"The cost of the solution is approximately $12 per user. However, the cost depends on what modules you're using. They have an all-in-one package and they do have tiers. For example, the more users you have, the cheaper it ends up being in the end too. I know they've done some changes to the pricing model and I haven't been involved in a lot of the licensing lately. I don't know the exact cost at this time."
"We are using an enterprise license for JumpCloud. We have purchased a license for approximately $3,000 a year, but we are charged more than $135,000 annually."
"I rate the product's pricing a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
"Licensing cost can be anywhere between $2 and $18 a month depending on what you want to do."
"JumpCloud's monthly license costs around $25 for the complete solution."
"The pricing is all on the JumpCloud website. It's not hidden, you don't have to go through a show me a quote type procedure. The pricing is straightforward to understand."
"JumpCloud offers several subscription plans as a software-as-a-service (SaaS) provider. The pricing is based on the number of users and the services that are required, meaning that you only pay for what you consume and don't have to pay for services that you don't need. When compared to other solutions, JumpCloud can actually be more cost-effective, as it eliminates the need to hire a team, purchase hardware, pay for licenses and software, and worry about updates, security, and backups. Thus, it offers a more efficient and cost-effective solution for managing your needs."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Password Managers solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Educational Organization
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about iboss?
Content filtering is the most useful feature of iboss.
What needs improvement with iboss?
Sometimes the agent stops working in iboss, and we have to reinstall the agent. This is a hiccup that iboss should im...
What is your primary use case for iboss?
We use iboss for the proxy solution. I used iboss in my organization to block a few sites for a few of my employees.
Which is better - Azure Key Vault or AWS Secrets Manager?
Azure Key Vault is a SaaS solution. You can easily store passwords and secrets securely and encrypt them. Azure Key V...
What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Key Vault?
With Azure Key Vault, we can generate our own keys and then import them inside the system, which provides a higher le...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Key Vault?
Azure Key Vault is a very, very expensive solution. Currently, the solution's pricing is based on the number of trans...
What do you like most about JumpCloud?
The product enables device management.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JumpCloud?
The solution is pretty expensive. It costs us EUR 250 per user per month. It was a point of hesitation for us. We can...
What needs improvement with JumpCloud?
We need more multi-factor authentication possibilities. I opened a ticket for it. However, it is not configurable in ...
 

Also Known As

iBoss Cloud Platform
Microsoft Azure Key Vault, MS Azure Key Vault
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

More than 4,000 global enterprises trust the iboss Cloud Platform to support their modern workforces, including a large number of Fortune 50 companies.
Adobe, DriveTime, Johnson Controls, HP, InterContinental Hotels Group, ASOS
Cars.com, GoFundMe, Grab, ClassPass, Uplight, Beyond Finance, Foursquare
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Key Vault vs. JumpCloud and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.