

CyberArk Certificate Manager and Azure Key Vault compete in the certificate and key management domain. CyberArk appears to have the upper hand in automation capabilities, particularly beneficial for large enterprises with complex environments, while Azure Key Vault leads in cost-effectiveness and integration within the Azure ecosystem.
Features: CyberArk Certificate Manager is notable for its robust automation capabilities, streamlining certificate lifecycle management, and integrating seamlessly with platforms like IIS, AWS, and Azure. It is particularly adept at reducing operational risks and enhancing cryptographic governance, which is crucial for enterprises shifting towards Zero Trust architectures. Azure Key Vault excels in ease of use and provides secure storage for secrets, promoting security best practices. Its integration with Azure services offers a comprehensive solution for managing keys across different environments.
Room for Improvement: CyberArk Certificate Manager could benefit from expanding out-of-the-box integrations and simplifying its documentation to facilitate easier user onboarding. Users report challenges with manual interventions and integration with specific cybersecurity tools. Azure Key Vault may improve by enhancing key rotation processes and offering more robust cross-platform compatibility. Users seek improvements in technical support and more cost-effective solutions considering the potential high costs for transactions.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CyberArk Certificate Manager is typically deployed on-premises and is recognized for fast and competent technical support, though some users experience variable response times. Azure Key Vault, widely deployed in public and hybrid cloud environments, benefits from Microsoft's extensive support network, despite being slower in deployment compared to CyberArk. Each solution offers distinct advantages based on deployment needs, with CyberArk excelling in on-premises environments and Azure Key Vault optimized for cloud scenarios.
Pricing and ROI: CyberArk Certificate Manager is perceived as costly but delivers considerable ROI through automation and risk mitigation, making it favorable for large enterprises. Despite complexities in pricing, its advanced capabilities often justify the expense. Azure Key Vault, with its pay-as-you-go model, offers affordability and lower initial costs, though transaction-based pricing can become expensive for high-volume users. While providing significant value, the choice between CyberArk's comprehensive features and Azure Key Vault's cost-effective integration depends on the organization's specific needs and scale.
Earlier, we had an operations team of seven people to manage certificates manually, but now it has reduced costs by reducing the team to two people with the help of the certificate management tool.
CyberArk Certificate Manager is doing its best with multiple layers of security.
I have seen a return on investment in terms of money saved and time saved.
Technical support from Azure responds as quickly as possible without any delay.
I have a strong relationship with Microsoft since we are one of their best clients in Spain.
The skill level of the support staff is also questionable.
Inquiries are typically addressed the same day, with most issues, even complex ones, resolved within 24 hours.
Venafi's technical support is excellent, with even their first-tier support being in-house and highly competent.
Their technical support is knowledgeable and helpful, making Venafi stand out among other CyberArk products.
This role-based access control enhances scalability and efficiency by providing a focused view of necessary information.
Horizontal scaling is a necessity rather than vertical scaling.
Scalability with Venafi is good; you can definitely use it if you have ten thousand certs, a thousand certs, a million, or a couple million.
Venafi's stability has been consistently reliable.
Venafi is a stable product. It's definitely more stable than others.
I observed that in the last year, CyberArk Certificate Manager was down two to three times without any notification.
My security area wants to rotate passwords every day, every week, or every month, depending on the services.
One of our certificates was not getting deployed, and during that time, the support team was unsure and had to connect with the back-end team for assistance.
The skill level of the support staff is also questionable.
Expanding the range of out-of-the-box integrations would significantly improve the user experience.
The yearly DNS verification required by certificate authorities necessitates manual intervention, hindering full automation.
They are pushing for cloud adoption, but we prefer on-premises solutions due to regulatory concerns.
I would classify it as low priced.
The pricing of Azure Key Vault is nominal, not that expensive.
We are planning to buy protection for Entra.
Venafi offers good value for the cost.
The pricing has increased for us, impacting our organization due to its operational expenditure (OPEX).
For our budget, Venafi's cost is moderate. It's not expensive as internal certificate generation is free, and we only pay for the public CA certificate signer and for storage in Venafi.
All secrets are in the Key Vault, and access is managed by the integrated management in ITT, which Azure provides to the services.
It also helps me increase my security posture and assists with regulatory and compliance requirements.
Since implementing Azure Key Vault, I have observed that instead of storing plain values, we can store them securely as and when required.
The most valuable feature of Venafi is the automation that helps save time and reduce human error.
It ensures centralized certificate management, which is crucial for compliance and maintaining best practices.
What I like best about Venafi is that it's very easy to get somebody on a call and get any of my questions answered.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Azure Key Vault | 16.8% |
| CyberArk Certificate Manager | 8.4% |
| Other | 74.8% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 27 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
Azure Key Vault provides secure key management, secret storage, and encryption, ensuring data remains protected while integrating seamlessly with Azure services. It centralizes security credentials, facilitating management in both development and production environments.
Azure Key Vault is a robust choice for teams managing secure, automated access to credentials, secrets, and cryptographic keys. With its scalable access policies and automated key rotation, it simplifies identity access management and enhances compliance efforts. The platform’s ability to securely manage secrets while integrating with a wide range of Azure services is a notable advantage. While its user-friendly interface and regional availability are significant benefits, there is room for improvement in areas like ease of configuration, integration with third-party vendors, and overall cost-effectiveness. Suggestions for enhanced disaster recovery options and industry-specific use cases could expand its versatility further.
What are the key features of Azure Key Vault?In industries managing sensitive data such as finance, healthcare, and e-commerce, Azure Key Vault is crucial for maintaining compliance and protecting confidential information. By centralizing the management of security credentials, it supports the secure integration of applications and services, helping companies reduce risk while facilitating compliance with industry standards.
CyberArk Certificate Manager automates and streamlines certificate processes, reducing errors and enhancing efficiency. It centralizes management, supports compliance, and improves certificate lifecycle management with customizable features.
CyberArk Certificate Manager offers a streamlined approach to managing certificates, focusing on automation that minimizes manual intervention and errors. Its discovery and centralized management enhance operational efficiency, while integration capabilities facilitate seamless handling of certificates across systems like AWS and Azure. Users benefit from its user-friendly, intuitive interface, robust reporting, and customizable notifications, which improve compliance, reduce bottlenecks, and allow for custom field creation. Though the on-premises version is mature, there is room for improvement in cloud service integration and out-of-the-box features. Additional enhancements are needed in documentation clarity, hardware security module support, and diverse scripting language support.
What are the most important features of CyberArk Certificate Manager?
What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?
CyberArk Certificate Manager finds applications across multiple industries like finance and healthcare where stringent security protocols are critical. Organizations use it for server authentication and managing application IDs, ensuring compliance and preventing outages. Its integration with major cloud platforms and automation of installations across endpoints makes it an ideal choice for companies focusing on enhancing security and operational efficiency.
We monitor all Certificate Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.