Axway Synchrony vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite comparison

Axway and Seeburger are both solutions in the Business-to-Business Middleware category. Additionally, 66% of Axway users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Seeburger users who would recommend it.

Axway Synchrony

Read 3 Axway Synchrony reviews

66% willing to recommend

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Read 39 SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite reviews

7,673 Views
2,609 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Axway Synchrony

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Axway Synchrony and SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Informatica, Seeburger and others in Business-to-Business Middleware.

To learn more, read our detailed Business-to-Business Middleware Report (Updated: July 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Business-to-Business Middleware

July 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axway Synchrony

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (12th), API Management (23rd), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (14th)

Featured Reviews

it_user651522

Delivery Module Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

It provides an API for advanced configuration. Version 6.11.4 is no longer supported by the vendor.

It is robust and flexible on new flow configurations. It provides an API for advanced configuration It provides centralized monitoring and managing of organization application file transfers, which helps to reduce the time of monitoring of individual applications. It also helps us understand the…

Read full review

Shaik Saifuddin

Senior Software Engineer at HCLTech

Exceptional support and reliability drive optimal data flow and integration

The features of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite that I found most valuable are related to entity flow. We can find the entity flow to be very useful so we can grab the flow accordingly. There is no disturbance in the connections, and it is very clear to check the connection flow with applicable queues. When comparing to other applications, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is the easiest way to understand the application. I have also worked on the cloud services where SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is moving to cloud. I have worked on cloud services where the mapping part is in the cloud itself, along with the connection setup.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is easy to use and is a feature-rich application in the EDI space."

"The most valuable features are XFB for its FTPS and SFTP."

"It provides centralized monitoring and managing of organization application file transfers, which helps to reduce the time of monitoring of individual applications and helps us understand the file flow between applications and helps with troubleshooting issues."

"The product is reliable, we don't have any outages, we do get the messages, everything is converted, and there is a query tool."

"It used to take half an hour to move one file from one location to another. Now, it takes 10 minutes."

"Ninety per cent of our sales order processing is automated through our SB BIS 6 system."

"SEEBURGER has helped us to enable digital business transformation. Every time we add a new customer, there is a digital footprint. This is no longer a manual process."

"We haven't had any issues with scaling."

"This solution has reduced it down to an average of six days, with zero backlog."

"The solution's capabilities in fulfilling our existing B2B integration requirements are brilliant, and among our multiple customers we connect to SAP systems, JDE, all the various ERPs that you can possibly get, Oracle procurement systems, etc., and we haven't come across anything yet — and customers are trying to trip us up — that we can't do."

"It's a very robust solution and it's very configurable. Before this product we would use an ESB-type of solution which required us to write code and go through a process. We can configure the SEEBURGER solution much more easily, instead of writing code... It can handle large files very well."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite pros

Cons

"Axway Synchrony Gateway 6.11.4 is no longer supported by the vendor."

"There are cheaper alternatives available in the market."

"The logging could be better in XFB."

"There are a few capabilities that have come out a little late. TIBCO introduced its container edition way back; SEEBURGER is only in the initial phase of 6.7 and they are a little slow in releasing newer features."

"Error messages in the main area could be better, but you can say that about any product."

"Frontline support, or first-level support though, gets a rating of 4/10. Most of the time, they seem to be very bad at understanding the critical nature of an issue and they rarely manage to fulfill their own SLAs."

"The speed of development needs improvement."

"The cost models have room for improvement. There are different licensing models between Europe and the USA, which is something that I don't understand."

"All the topics we've identified have been placed on the SEEBURGER roadmap already... Among the things we have requested are improvements in the user interface and improvements that would be implemented by completely new modules or improvements in their Cloud Services."

"The product is not integrated very well with different cloud providers. We did work with the vendor to build a solution for Amazon, but there is no solution for other cloud providers like Google or Azure. The vendor needs to create adapters so that if we have a requirement to transfer data from our data center to another cloud, outside of Amazon, we would be delighted with that."

"We occasionally get ZIP files. Sometimes the ZIP file has one file inside of it, and sometimes the ZIP file might have 30 files inside of it. We have been working with SEEBURGER to enhance their PKUNZIP process to be able to unzip multiple files in a single workflow instead of just one file. This is still something that is in process."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"All the new adapters are individually priced, which is good. You don't buy the whole system and then if you don't use it, you don't use it. You only buy the stuff you want..."

"Price and licensing are comparable to other systems. It's well-priced and simple. It's not user-based or anything. It's just per seat, per system. So, it's pretty straight forward. Because it's per system, one system is enough. However, if you want to make it larger, then you can grow with it."

"We pay per message we use. We spend about £19,000 a year with them."

"We pay for a maximum number of setups, then we pay per customer map, and we pay maintenance on each one of those. BIS provides the flexibility to pay as you grow. The price of each customer map is €200 and the hourly rate for maintenance is fairly reasonable."

"The pricing seems to be competitive and the maintenance is standard."

"They need to be more competitively priced. When it comes to training, they need to lower their prices. It shouldn't be so specific. Maybe they should outsource training to another company. From what I can see, their training is pretty expensive, and they don't do anything for free."

"I did a review of other options out there, as we moved into the future and our SAP implementation, that this would be the right solution. It was very comparable to other manage services out there. Thus, there wasn't any clear-cut reason to go in another direction."

"The only thing that would be an improvement would be if they had a cost model whereby you could just pay for what you're actually using. Even if it were a minimum monthly charge that they offered, if you're not utilizing all of that then they should consider a lower tier. That way, they could attract more business."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	38

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Regarding the pricing of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, I would rate it as 7 out of 10.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Regarding areas of improvement for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, the cloud functionality needs enhancement. The cloud interface is currently too cluttered, especially when creating new tran...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

I have worked around 3.5 years with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite ( /products/seeburger-business-integration-suite-reviews ). Currently, I am working with WebMethods. Previously, I worked fo...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM B2B Integrator vs Axway Synchrony

Compared 22% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Axway Synchrony

Compared 18% of the time

Avada Software Infrared360 vs Axway Synchrony

Compared 16% of the time

Oracle BI Applications vs Axway Synchrony

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Trading Grid vs Axway Synchrony

Compared 10% of the time

More Axway Synchrony Competitors

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 6% of the time

SAP Integration Suite vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 6% of the time

IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 5% of the time

IBM B2B Integrator vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 5% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 5% of the time

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business-to-Business Middleware

July 2026

Download Axway Synchrony product report

Buyer's Guide

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

July 2026

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite report

Download SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite product report

Also Known As

Synchrony

SEEBURGER BIS

Overview

Information not available

Axway

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is a versatile platform supporting multiple integration patterns with rich adapters and easy Java coding, known for fault tolerance and seamless SAP integration.

SEEBURGER offers extensive EDI capabilities and adaptability across protocols. The platform provides tools for entity flow, data mapping, message tracking, and high-volume performance. Appreciated for reliability, scalability, and automation, it enables independent adaptation, maintaining stability in efficient data communication. However, handling large datasets can be challenging. Users desire improved cloud and API integration, enhanced error handling, and more accessible training resources. Frequent updates and new features are valued, but customization can be slow, and support experiences are inconsistent.

What are the most important features of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Flexible Integration: Supports multiple integration patterns and protocols.
Rich Adapter Suite: Extensive adapter options available.
Seamless SAP Integration: Enables smooth SAP processes.
EDI Capabilities: Comprehensive electronic data interchange support.
Fault Tolerance: Maintains stability and reliable operation.
Entity Flow Tools: Provides detailed data mapping and message tracking.

What benefits may organizations look for in reviews when evaluating SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Reliability: Ensures consistent performance across platforms.
Scalability: Adapts to growing data and organizational needs.
Automation: Reduces need for programming expertise.
Protocol Adaptability: Supports diverse communication standards.

In industries, SEEBURGER is used for EDI transactions, partner communication, and data integration. Organizations benefit from scripting, process monitoring, certifications, and secure transfers like AS2 and SFTP, facilitating data conversion and internal connections. Implemented on-premises and in the cloud, SEEBURGER adapts to custom business processes.

Seeburger

Sample Customers

AIFE - Chorus, Soci_t_ Financire de Distribution (SFD) B2B, International Post Corporation, Union Nationale de Mutualit_s Socialistes, State of California, BHF-BANK, DHL, Clearstream MFT, CITIC Pacific Limited, Genzyme, AstraZeneca, Bollor_ Logistics, STET, MOgroep, Dartford Borough Council

Altis, Autoliv, Cebi, Cofresco, MoneyGram International, Samsonite Europe, VSP Global, BMW Group, OSRAM, Magna, Lavazza

Buyer's Guide

Business-to-Business Middleware

July 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Informatica, Seeburger and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: July 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.