Axiad Conductor vs Entrust Identity Enterprise comparison

Axiad and Entrust are both solutions in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category. Axiad is ranked #29, while Entrust is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.7. Axiad holds a 0.3% mindshare in IAMS, compared to Entrust’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Axiad users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Entrust users who would recommend it.

Axiad Conductor

Read 6 Axiad Conductor reviews

968 Views
339 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Read 7 Entrust Identity Enterprise reviews

984 Views
315 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Axiad Conductor

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 22, 2025

Entrust Identity Enterprise and Axiad Conductor compete in the identity management space. Entrust may have an advantage in accessibility due to its extensive features, while Axiad benefits from streamlined integration and innovative capabilities.

Features: Entrust Identity Enterprise offers robust authentication methods, versatile digital identity solutions, and advanced compliance features. Axiad Conductor provides seamless credential management, passwordless authentication options, and effective device lifecycle management. Entrust focuses on adaptability and compliance, while Axiad emphasizes integration efficiency and innovation.

Room for Improvement: Entrust Identity Enterprise could enhance user interface intuitiveness, streamline the setup process, and improve reporting capabilities. Axiad Conductor could work on extending customization options, enhancing its API capabilities, and refining user support documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Entrust Identity Enterprise offers a flexible deployment model with scalable options and dedicated customer support to adapt to various environments. Axiad Conductor features an intuitive deployment process supported by responsive customer service, favoring rapid integration and ease of management.

Pricing and ROI: Entrust Identity Enterprise involves competitive setup costs with a focus on long-term ROI through its comprehensive features. Axiad Conductor offers cost-effective solutions with immediate integration benefits and ROI through innovation. Entrust aligns its pricing with broad service offerings, whereas Axiad balances cost with capabilities for financial effectiveness.

To learn more, read our detailed Axiad Conductor vs. Entrust Identity Enterprise Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Axiad Conductor vs. Entrust Identity Enterprise

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axiad Conductor

Ranking in Authentication Systems

23rd

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

29th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity Management (IM) (58th), Privileged Access Management (PAM) (40th), Passwordless Authentication (9th), Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) (7th)

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Ranking in Authentication Systems

16th

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

21st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category, the mindshare of Axiad Conductor is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Entrust Identity Enterprise is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

Featured Reviews

Eric Brown

Cybersecurity Director - Enterprise Identity & Access Management at SAIC

The day-to-day tasks, running the servers, and making sure that everything is patched is all handled by the platform

The most valuable feature is the overhead management of the platform. There is less for my team to worry about. The day-to-day tasks, running the servers, and making sure that everything is patched is all handled by the platform. We just consume the service and work with them to refine it, making it even more valuable. Aside from Active Directory, anything that is a multi-factor platform is handled through Axiad Cloud. It is critical for helping to enforce usage of authentication devices across our organization. One of our requirements to continue some of our contracts is to have multi-factor authentication across all devices accessing the network. It is extremely easy to enroll a user with “One Click Issuance”. I have had very few calls to the service desk regarding enrollment. It takes a couple of minutes to enroll a user with "One Click Issuance". Deploying and managing authenticators is very easy, either done by a mobile application or enrollment of an OTP token. It is very simple. This is important to my userbase, which makes it important to me. Functionality-wise, it is pretty solid.

Read full review

Iwegbue Godspower Isioma

Cyber Security Analyst at Platview Technologies

Provides strong authentication feature, which requires users to enter a one-time password (OTP)

The main issue I've noticed pertains to setting up the desktop client on virtual machines in Azure, GCP, or AWS, specifically for Entrust Identity Enterprise intended for on-premises use. It works for on-premises, but I'm not sure if it's fully supported in cloud environments. If support were added, it would function perfectly with on-premises configurations. So, it functions well on-premises, but integrating it with cloud services like AWS or Azure could be challenging. There are issues with cloud integrations, such as Azure, AWS, and GCP.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's very user-friendly. We're issuing YubiKeys for our corporate users and they just plug it in, go to the Axiad Cloud portal, and click the issue button. It's a couple of steps."

"And when it comes to enrolling a user, it's super easy with One Click Issuance... It's so easy now that we can offload the process to our clients who can self-enroll. Previously, we would have to do the enrollment process because it was so complicated."

"The solution has also saved us time by having end-users troubleshoot issues through the MyCircle feature, and has definitely reduced the efforts of our administrators. It is saving us five to 10 minutes per incident."

"What I have found most valuable is the overall way Axiad listened to our problems and helped us solve them. They provided guidance and expertise, with their experience, that enabled us to be successful in a very challenging space."

"Aside from Active Directory, anything that is a multi-factor platform is handled through Axiad Cloud. It is critical for helping to enforce usage of authentication devices across our organization."

"The life cycle management of credentials is the aspect that we have found to be the most useful... The differentiator that Axiad provided was the ability to provide users a way to self-serve the updating of their credentials on their private keys. That was the feature we were most interested in and Axiad does an excellent job of it."

"I am impressed with Entrust because they are one of the most advanced identity access management companies. Their portfolio of products is well aligned with the CISA zero trust framework. If you compare the features of Entrust products with the CISA pillars of zero trust, you'll see that they're perfectly matched with CISA requirements."

"It is a scalable solution. You can add users and credentials without problems."

"Entrust is an enterprise account, and they have a support system. Their training is also top-notch, and they are willing to share their knowledge with their partners."

"The integration matrix of the solution is huge compared to others."

"This solution is flexible and easy to use for our clients. We use it with different kinds of applications and integrate it with different processes."

Cons

"macOS is notoriously ever-evolving and it's difficult to keep pace with it as it pertains to certain kinds of crypto authentication. That's really not even on Axiad. That's a decision by Apple, but it makes it a moving target."

"I'm looking forward to seeing how they move to FIDO U2F as their primary authentication method across all of their solutions."

"There are just some minor tweaks that could be made on the front end. It would be cool to have nicknames for authenticator devices. If you have more than one, it's hard to discern what you have."

"With their licensing model, it becomes hard to scale. For example, we couldn't roll it out enterprise-wide because if you scale it across more than 100,000 users, the cost becomes too exorbitant."

"I would like a more modern look to the portal."

"We would prefer that the solution be hosted in Canada because we're a Canadian entity. That would be nice to have. It's not a feature, as such, but it would really make us a lot happier if it could be located in Canada."

"I would like to improve the tool's implementation and pricing."

"We are introducing new processes and are migrating to a new version. Once we explore new functionalities, we'll be able to assess what could be improved."

"The product is very costly compared to other alternative solutions."

"It functions well on-premises, but integrating it with cloud services like AWS or Azure could be challenging. There are issues with cloud integrations, such as Azure, AWS, and GCP."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's very cheap on a per-year basis. The cards themselves last about three years and the license is on the order of double-digit dollars per user, and not hundreds of dollars per user, per year."

"The pricing is very competitive for what is offered at the level that we need. They are right there with what the industry standards are. They tend to be a little bit less, in terms of cost, when we are talking about security at government standards. So, I would say that they have a slight advantage on cost compared to the industry average. They are the lower cost solution and the best bargain out on the market today."

"Don't just focus on the hardware or software costs of acquiring a solution, but look at it from the perspective that so much of what it takes to run a PKI environment has to do with the people who are running it.... look at the total cost of ownership and not just the cost of acquisition."

"Axiad's pricing was what we were expecting. It was at the right spot. They were competitive."

"I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."

"It's worth the money."

"The subscription could be yearly or monthly, depending upon your choice."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Government

15%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

10%

Performing Arts

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Entrust IdentityGuard?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Entrust IdentityGuard?

I use it for an extra layer of security, that is two-factor authentication (2FA).

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Entrust IdentityGuard?

I would recommend it. I've used it for three years now, and I'm very happy with it. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Venafi vs Axiad Conductor

Compared 42% of the time

Cisco Duo vs Axiad Conductor

Compared 31% of the time

Yubico YubiKey vs Axiad Conductor

Compared 27% of the time

More Axiad Conductor Competitors

Utimaco SecurityServer vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 24% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 14% of the time

Cisco Duo vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 12% of the time

Venafi vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

DigiCert PKI Platform vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

More Entrust Identity Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Axiad Conductor

August 2025

Download Axiad Conductor product report

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise

August 2025

Download Entrust Identity Enterprise product report

Also Known As

Axiad Cloud

IdentityGuard

Overview

Axiad Conductor offers a user-friendly platform for managing multifactor authentication and credential lifecycle, supporting seamless transitions to cloud environments for enhanced security compliance and access control.

Axiad Conductor stands out with intuitive management of multifactor authentication systems, assertive device lifecycle management, and a managed cloud solution that streamlines operations. It promotes user self-service for credential updates, minimizing the need for extensive training. With the capability to handle large networks, it enhances efficiency while meeting contract demands. Addressing user suggestions, plans include interface design updates and Canadian hosting, although macOS's frequent updates pose integration challenges.

What are the principal features of Axiad Conductor?

"One Click Issuance": Simplifies user enrollment through easy interface actions.
Multifactor Authentication: Manages critical authentication processes securely.
PKI Support: Facilitates seamless management in PKI environments.
Credential Self-Service: Empowers users to handle updates independently.
Cloud Management: Reduces operational burdens due to its managed environment.

What should users look for in terms of ROI and benefits?

Efficiency: Streamlined operations boost productivity across large networks.
Flexibility: Adaptability to meet evolving challenges and contract requirements.
User Empowerment: Enables users to manage their credentials autonomously.
Compliance: Supports regulation adherence effortlessly.

In diverse industries, Axiad Conductor is implemented to manage multifactor authentication and PKI elements like smart cards and YubiKeys. Organizations leverage it to ensure compliance, facilitate secure workforce access, and transition PKI systems to the cloud, handling substantial volumes of smart card and machine certificates with ease.

Axiad

Identity Enterprise is an integrated IAM platform that supports a full suite of workforce, consumer, and citizen use cases. Ideally suited for high-assurance applications that require a Zero Trust approach for thousands or millions of users, Identity Enterprise can be deployed on-premises.

Entrust

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Bank of New Zealand, CRISIL, Banco Mercantil, G_teborg University, Ministry of Economic Development of New Zealand, Ocean Systems, Skanska, Societe Generale, Susquehanna Bancshares

Buyer's Guide

Axiad Conductor vs. Entrust Identity Enterprise

August 2025

Free Report: Axiad Conductor vs. Entrust Identity Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about Axiad Conductor vs. Entrust Identity Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axiad Conductor vs. Entrust Identity Enterprise report.

See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors and best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.