"Systems Manager has a feature where it analyzes the logs and gives us a performance overview in the form of a graph. We know when it's taking up more resources and when there are spikes, so we can predict the usability."
"When it comes to managing both Red Hat and SUSE environments, it provides the support for live patching, which is something I really, really appreciate."
"We formerly used third-party products to analyze the log, give us information, and find bottlenecks. Systems Manager could provide more tools that conduct this analysis, so we don't have to do it ourselves."
"I really would like to have a broader library of VCP's or playbooks that I can deploy."
AWS Systems Manager is ranked 12th in Configuration Management with 1 review while SUSE Manager is ranked 11th in Configuration Management with 1 review. AWS Systems Manager is rated 8.0, while SUSE Manager is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AWS Systems Manager writes "Root cause analysis helps us find source of unexpected spikes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SUSE Manager writes "Easy to deploy, offers embedded monitoring, and is very stable". AWS Systems Manager is most compared with Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, AWS OpsWorks, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Red Hat Satellite and BMC TrueSight Server Automation, whereas SUSE Manager is most compared with Red Hat Satellite, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, HashiCorp Terraform, BigFix and BMC TrueSight Server Automation.
See our list of best Configuration Management vendors.
We monitor all Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.