AWS Lake Formation vs Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse comparison

AWS Lake Formation vs. Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse

Download the complete report

Helped 900,838 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Lake Formation

Ranking in Cloud Data Warehouse

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Autonomous Data Ware...

Ranking in Cloud Data Warehouse

14th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Cloud Data Warehouse category, the mindshare of AWS Lake Formation is 3.8%, down from 5.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse is 4.7%, up from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Warehouse Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AWS Lake Formation	3.8%
Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse	4.7%
Other	91.5%

Cloud Data Warehouse

Featured Reviews

Ciro Baldim Guerra

Sr Analytics Engineer at Itau Unibanco S.A.

Has improved data governance by enabling clear ownership and structured access across teams

In my company, Itaú, we don't utilize all AWS offerings due to rigorous security measures. We operate approximately six to eight months behind other available services. I'm uncertain if gaps exist because of this limitation, though the system functions effectively for us. AWS Lake Formation offers column-level access control for databases, but we haven't implemented this feature either because it hasn't been approved by our compliance, governance, or security areas. In our current setup, everyone from my business unit uses the same consumer account. When access is requested for a table, everyone using that business unit account receives access. This could present a security concern, though it benefits new team members who automatically receive all necessary access permissions. However, I struggle to identify specific improvements needed in AWS Lake Formation.

Read full review

Kwajah Mohiuddin

Global Head of Architecture at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Provides self-repair features, but the setup is complex

We use the product for online applications. We use it in the financial industry The product has self-repair features. The tool tunes itself. It separates compute from storage. We can scale storage and compute separately. The setup is complex. Oracle is a complex tool. I have been using Oracle…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is seamlessly integrated within the AWS ecosystem, making it straightforward to manage access patterns for AWS-native services."

"The most valuable features of AWS Lake Formation were the access model itself, as it allows implementation of filters, Blueprints, and row-level and column-level security to mask data that shouldn't be accessed by certain entities, enabling granular control without exposing PII data."

"The solution has many features that are applicable to events such as audits."

"Every solution has its pros and cons, however, for our purposes, this solution works quite well for us."

"In the shortest form, what I appreciated about AWS Lake Formation was that the schema definition and data cataloging were quite good."

"The features and capabilities of AWS Lake Formation that I have found most valuable are that it is really convenient to see all the different data assets that were configured and understand who has and what type of service has or does not have access to those services."

"The LF-Tag system with granular permissions was key to the project as a functionality of AWS Lake Formation."

"The solution is quite good at handling analytics. It's done a good job at helping us centralize them."

More AWS Lake Formation pros

"It provides Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) capabilities by default to address data security issues."

"The product is easy to use."

"Self-patching and runs machine-learning across its logs all the time"

"I really like the auto-tuning, auto-scaling, and the automatic load balancing and query tuning in the system."

"The autonomous database provides several benefits and unmatched performance."

"The integration feature is very good because you can automate protection security automatically, restricting the access of unauthorized people."

"The analytics have been very good. We've found them to be quite useful."

"I like the fact that the solution is self-patching, that it's running machine-learning generally across its logs all the time in order to identify any issues and to self-repair."

More Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse pros

Cons

"Rather than creating an additional hundred tools, optimizing a tool to have a centralized location to do governance would be beneficial."

"The main challenge we faced with AWS Lake Formation was related to cross-account sharing. Granting access to other AWS accounts for tables or databases in a different AWS account was somewhat difficult."

"AWS Lake Formation's pricing could be cheaper."

"I think AWS Lake Formation could improve by enforcing the least privilege by design, moving from ad hoc grants to role-based access controls."

"If I could improve AWS Lake Formation, I would add more integrations with SageMaker."

"For the end-users, it's not as user-friendly as it could be."

"I would appreciate online support, which I don't have access to in my corporation at the bank, so that is important."

"It falls short when it comes to more granular access control, such as cell-level or row-level entitlements which is a significant drawback for organizations that require precise control over who can access specific rows of data."

More AWS Lake Formation cons

"I would like to see Application Express and Oracle R Enterprise fully supported, and I would like to see Oracle Data Mining supported as a front end."

"My main suggestion for Oracle is the configuration and key values that come for JSON files. When we create a table, especially if you see in our RedShift or some other stuff, if I create a table on top of a JSON file with multiple array columns or superset columns, those column values create some difficulty in Oracle."

"I would like to see an on-premise solution in the future."

"One of the major problem is creating custom tablespace. The ADB serverless option doesn't support custom tablespace creation, which could cause issues during on-premise database migration that requires specifically named tablespace. There should be an option to create customized tablespace."

"A lot of the tools that were previously there have now been taken away."

"One of the major problem is creating custom tablespace."

"The setup is complex."

"It is very important the integration with other platforms be made to be as easy as it is with an on-premises deployment."

More Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS Lake Formation is a bit expensive."

"Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse's pricing is fair and reasonable compared to the other cloud vendors."

"The solution's cost is reasonable."

"In terms of architecture and pricing structure, I feel it is a little bit costly compared to Azure. It's fine compared to RedShift, but compared to Azure, it's a bit pricey when you calculate for one TB storage plus around five hours of reporting with the frequency of 1TB data. The cost adds up, making Oracle a bit expensive."

"Cloud solutions are cheaper, but in the long run, they may not be much cheaper. They certainly have a lower initial cost. The licensing is yearly, and it is based on the size of the hardware and the number of users."

"The solution is expensive."

"The cost is perfect with Oracle Universal credit."

"The price depends on the configuration we choose."

"The licensing cost of the product can vary since you can integrate it very easily with other products or other cloud products...You pay as you use it, so it is not yearly or monthly payments to be made toward Oracle."

More Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,838 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Media Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Lake Formation?

I don't understand much about the pricing of AWS Lake Formation, but I know how to search for the cost of Glue jobs, and I use the calculator in Amazon. I use a tool to preview the cost based on th...

What needs improvement with AWS Lake Formation?

Regarding areas of AWS Lake Formation that could be improved or enhanced, I prefer not to answer, mainly because I do not believe that I would be the most valuable person to ask, as I have not used...

What is your primary use case for AWS Lake Formation?

My usual use cases for AWS Lake Formation involved securing and governing the data resources that we configured in AWS, but we did not use the analytics or machine learning capabilities specificall...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse?

We pay approximately $70,000 per month. The cost includes maintenance and support.

What needs improvement with Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse?

Optimization should be better. The SQLs are sometimes very slow. I also noticed that Java is not supported, which is not ideal.

What is your primary use case for Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse?

We are using Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse for analytics in my company.

Amazon Redshift vs AWS Lake Formation

Comparisons

Compared 13% of the time

Snowflake vs AWS Lake Formation

Compared 13% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs AWS Lake Formation

Compared 10% of the time

Databricks vs AWS Lake Formation

Compared 9% of the time

BigQuery vs AWS Lake Formation

Compared 9% of the time

More AWS Lake Formation Competitors

BigQuery vs Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse

Compared 18% of the time

Snowflake vs Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse

Compared 17% of the time

Databricks vs Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics vs Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon Redshift vs Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse Competitors

Product Reports

AWS Lake Formation

Download AWS Lake Formation product report

Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse

Download Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse product report

Overview

AWS Lake Formation streamlines data lake organization by integrating seamlessly with AWS services, ensuring robust access control, and facilitating effective data management. Its extensible framework and centralized data handling make it ideal for cloud environments that require scalability.

AWS Lake Formation offers comprehensive data synchronization with AWS, robust security through fine-grained policies, and seamless team collaboration tools. It centralizes data assets, supports analytics with Glue, and enhances data mesh structures. Its IAM integration supports efficient governance, with reliable data storage and retrieval backed by extensive documentation. While highly efficient within AWS ecosystems, Lake Formation faces integration challenges with third-party libraries, and users experience clutter in its interface. Aspects such as automation, policy management, and debugging are areas for improvement. Enhancements in orchestration, cross-account sharing, and integrations with services like SageMaker are user recommendations.

What are the key features of AWS Lake Formation?

Data Synchronization: Integrates with AWS services for seamless data management.
Security Policies: Implements fine-grained access control for secure data handling.
Team Collaboration: Facilitates cooperation through centralized data management.
Analytics Support: Enhances data processing with Glue integration.
Extensibility: IAM integration allows scalable governance.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Scalability: Efficiently manages expanding data volumes.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces cloud data management expenses.
Data Security: Ensures compliance with robust policies.
Comprehensive Support: Access to detailed documentation and AWS resources.

Organizations utilize AWS Lake Formation across various industries to build and manage data lakes, ensuring effective data governance and storage solutions. It helps integrate and transform data, control permissions, and support analytics. From e-commerce to healthcare, AWS Lake Formation delivers centralized data repositories for structured and unstructured data, securing information while providing scalable infrastructure and efficient resource management.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse is a cloud-based service offering advanced data management capabilities, including automated administration and high performance for analytics tasks. It is ideal for enterprises prioritizing security, easy maintenance, and dynamic scale.

Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse stands out by offering self-managing capabilities that minimize administrative overhead, allowing organizations to focus on data-driven decision-making. With features such as transparent data encryption, seamless cloud integration, and automated query tuning, it ensures secure and efficient data operations. Its architecture separates compute and storage, enhancing scalability and performance. Despite its setup complexity and higher cost than some competitors, it offers deep integration with Oracle Database, ensuring reliable performance and fast data exchange.

What features define Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse?

Self-Patching: Automatically updates to ensure security and performance.
Auto-Scaling: Dynamically adjusts resources to meet workload demands.
Query Tuning: Optimizes queries for better performance without user intervention.
Seamless Cloud Integration: Easily connects with Oracle and other cloud applications.
Transparent Data Encryption: Provides secure data handling to meet compliance needs.
Smart Scan: Efficiently processes queries to reduce data retrieval times.

What benefits can be expected from Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse?

Cost-Effectiveness: Reduces operational costs through automation and serverless operations.
High Security: Ensures data protection with encryption and isolated resources.
Performance Enhancement: High-speed data processing and query response times.
Easy Maintenance: Minimal administrative tasks due to automation.
Scalability: Effortlessly scales resources to accommodate growth.

Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse is widely used in finance, banking, transport, and manufacturing, supporting data analytics in financial systems, procurement, and student management. It facilitates large-scale transaction processing, offering centralized reporting and dynamic resource allocation, which is crucial for enhancing performance across industries.

Oracle

Sample Customers

bp, Cerner, Expedia, Finra, HESS, intuit, Kellog's, Philips, TIME, workday

Hertz, TaylorMade Golf, Outront Media, Kingold, FSmart, Drop-Tank

AWS Lake Formation vs. Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse