We performed a comparison between AWS Glue and Dataloader.io based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration."AWS Glue is a good solution for developers, they have the ability to write code in different languages and other software."
"Our entire use case was very easily handled or solved using this solution."
"I like that it's flexible, powerful, and allows you to write your own queries and scripts to get the needed transformations."
"The solution's technical support is good. Whenever we raise a use case where we face an issue in our company, we get a response from the solution's technical team."
"The facility to integrate with S3 and the possibility to use Jupyter Notebook inside the pipeline are the most valuable features."
"The solution helps organizations gain flexibility in defining the structure of the data."
"I like its integration and ability to handle all data-related tasks."
"The product has a valuable feature for data catalog."
"he product’s most valuable feature is ease of access."
"Overall, I consider the technical support to be fine, although the response time could be faster in certain cases."
"The start-up time is really high right now. For instance, when you start up a new job, you have to wait for five or eight minutes before it starts. If the start-up time is reduced to one or two minutes, it will be great. It will be better to have a direct linkage to Redshift in AWS. If we can use data catalogs from Redshift, it will be so easy to create some data catalogs. Currently, we can only use data catalogs from S3."
"It fails to handle massive databases acquired from various sources."
"I would like to see a more robust interface on the no-code side. This would be nice to be able to split cells."
"The monitoring is not that good."
"In terms of performance, if they can further optimize the execution time for serverless jobs, it would be a welcome improvement."
"Glue could perform better. It sometimes takes too long to test a Glue job. Google Cloud Platform offers more Python scripts than AWS."
"AWS Glue is more costly compared to other tools like Airflow."
"We need help with large data migrations. It only works well for a few thousand records or less than a million records."
AWS Glue is ranked 1st in Cloud Data Integration with 37 reviews while Dataloader.io is ranked 39th in Data Integration with 1 review. AWS Glue is rated 7.8, while Dataloader.io is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS Glue writes "Provides serverless mechanism, easy data transformation and automated infrastructure management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Dataloader.io writes "Provides an ease of access and an automated mapping feature". AWS Glue is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS, Informatica Cloud Data Integration and Talend Open Studio, whereas Dataloader.io is most compared with DBamp, Mule Anypoint Platform and BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.