No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

AWS Backup vs Rubrik Go comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Backup
Ranking in SaaS Backup
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Backup (12th)
Rubrik Go
Ranking in SaaS Backup
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the SaaS Backup category, the mindshare of AWS Backup is 4.0%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rubrik Go is 2.0%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
SaaS Backup Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
AWS Backup4.0%
Rubrik Go2.0%
Other94.0%
SaaS Backup
 

Featured Reviews

AmitMishra1 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer II at Jash Data Sciences
Centralized policies have simplified backups and reduced errors while improving data protection
AWS Backup offers many valuable features. Some of the best features include centralized backup management, which provides the capability to back up data centrally and manage it, and automated backup scheduling. Another excellent feature is cross-region and cross-account backup support. AWS Backup also includes lifecycle policies that move data to cold storage and offers an easy restore process, which is one of the most useful features. Centralized backup plans are the most useful feature because instead of configuring backup per service, one policy can be defined and applied across services. This saves operational overhead and ensures consistency. Cross-region backup is very useful for disaster recovery scenarios, which is a favorite feature. AWS Backup has positively impacted the organization by improving the backup strategy and reducing the risk of data loss. It has also simplified audit and compliance since everything is centrally managed. The shift from manual backup configuration to policy-based automation has saved time and reduced errors. The reduction of errors in backups has been reduced by 90%, and there are now no errors in backups.
AmarpreetSingh - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Streamlined data management reduces workload and costs significantly for the team
We are planning to use Rubrik Go's AI-powered insights for predictive analytics, but have not implemented this yet. I cannot provide updates on Rubrik Go's capability to automate data management tasks because I have not used that feature yet. Rubrik Go's integration capabilities with cloud providers have benefited my multi-cloud environment significantly. Rubrik Go's subscription model has helped me align my data protection investments, which is a good option as I am one of the customers who have deployed this subscription option. I am definitely satisfied with the licensing model as it is very simplified and easy to understand. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Rubrik Go a 9.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Overall, AWS Backup provides value in terms of time and money through its periodic backup capabilities."
"It is quite easy to manage AWS Backup's centralized console for multiple environments."
"The most valuable feature is its ease of use."
"It is an easy-to-use solution."
"AWS Backup has positively impacted the organization by improving the backup strategy and reducing the risk of data loss."
"The most valuable features we have found are the flexibility in the services offered."
"The advantage that AWS Backup has over competitors is that it's very simple."
"What I like about AWS Backup is its simple approach to a complex problem."
"The solution is easy to install; our team just has to put together the plan, give it to IT and let them handle it. Other solutions are quite complex, but this is much simpler."
"The automation capabilities streamline our operations significantly."
"In terms of Rubrik Go's most valuable features, their VM features are good."
"The solution's most valuable features are its ease of use and performance."
"This product has positively impacted my organization because in the legacy tool, we used to have significant workload and significant people to be deployed, in this case, we have very minimal requirements."
"This solution is very simple and easy to use, and it is easy to implement, but I would like more enhancements and features to be added."
"The most valuable feature is the storage efficiency, as the storage footprint is very good."
"Rubrik Go is both very scalable and stable."
 

Cons

"If AWS could also add some hybrid cloud features to AWS Backup, that would be a significant improvement. For example, currently, AWS Backup only backs up to the S3 and Amazon Cloud, and you can only restore from the Amazon Cloud only. However, some people have hybrid environments. They have some workloads on-premises and some workloads in the cloud."
"There are some limitations to partial backup in AWS Backup."
"There could be a centralized dashboard with a reporting feature notifying us of daily backup status."
"The initial setup of the solution is complex."
"The time it takes to complete the backups could be reduced."
"It could be less expensive."
"Its cost could be better than a few of its competitors."
"It requires a lot of time to connect the snapshot, identify the files, and restore a single file manually."
"Reporting could be improved. For now, it's only exported to CSB files."
"I would like to see better integration with applications, such as those from Microsoft, to make backing up from those applications simpler."
"Technical support isn't that good, especially if you compare it to a competitor like EMC."
"The AWS backups could be improved."
"I believe there's room for improvement in terms of support, particularly with Tier 3 support coming from the on-call team."
"The solution’s pricing could be reduced."
"I would like to see better integration with applications, such as those from Microsoft, to make backing up from those applications simpler."
"One of the issues with the product is that you cannot postpone a specific backup job. If you try to do that, every backup job is paused."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's price is reasonable."
"AWS is more expensive than some competitors like Azure."
"The pricing is okay."
"AWS Backup is free of cost, but we need to pay for the backup storage being used."
"AWS Backup is a very cheap solution."
"It's a myth that Cloud is cheap. Cloud is cheap initially, but the cost over time can be equal to your own infrastructure if you consume a lot."
"We don't use a lot of space, only approximately 900 GB, so the price is reasonable. For standing, it's okay. We normally do a payment to SSML, and they are the ones who pay over there. It is around $100 monthly."
"Price-wise, I rate the solution a six out of ten. One only has to pay for the storage cost of AWS solutions, which is the standard cost provided by AWS."
"The solution is reasonably priced."
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is expensive and ten is cheap, I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."
"It's an expensive product if you compare it to traditional backup solutions; however, if you compare it as a total cost of ownership for a solution, it is not."
"Rubrick Go is quite expensive - I would rate its pricing four out of ten."
"The client pays for the solution depending on what they use."
"I would rate the product's pricing a seven out of ten. The solution's costs are monthly."
"Rubrik Go is more cost-effective than similar solutions by other vendors."
"This is a very costly solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which SaaS Backup solutions are best for your needs.
886,664 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
University
6%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
6%
University
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise16
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise8
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS Backup?
The solution's most valuable features are its backup capability and tight integration with other AWS services.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Backup?
AWS Backup operates on a pay-as-you-go model without requiring a license.
What needs improvement with AWS Backup?
I would need to get feedback from my colleague to see what additional features I would like to see in AWS Backup in the next release to make it closer to ten.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rubrik Go?
My costs have been reduced by almost 40 to 45% compared to legacy systems.
What needs improvement with Rubrik Go?
I think integration with multiple cloud support could be an additional feature that would make the product even better. If the customer has more than one cloud, the integration with multiple clouds...
What is your primary use case for Rubrik Go?
We carry a few backup solutions because we are a reseller and were looking for a good solution that we can resell. We deal with Rubrik because we are also one of the resellers for them. We are deal...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

TransferWise
Public Consulting Group
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Backup vs. Rubrik Go and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
886,664 professionals have used our research since 2012.