Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Splunk Synthetic Monitoring comparison

Auvik and Splunk are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Auvik is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6, while Splunk is ranked #45 with an average rating of 9.0. Auvik holds a 0.9% mindshare in NMS, compared to Splunk’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 99% of Auvik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Read 190 Auvik Network Management (ANM) reviews

7,429 Views
1,103 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

Splunk Synthetic Monitoring

Read 1 Splunk Synthetic Monitoring review

279 Views
218 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Splunk Synthetic Monitoring

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Auvik Network Management (ANM) and Splunk Synthetic Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Auvik, Datadog and others in Network Monitoring Software.

To learn more, read our detailed Network Monitoring Software Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,491 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

2nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

190

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (3rd), Network Troubleshooting (2nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (3rd), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (2nd)

Splunk Synthetic Monitoring

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

45th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (36th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Auvik Network Management (ANM) is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk Synthetic Monitoring is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Jeremy Campbell

IT Manager at Seyer Industries

Enables us to get on top of issues before they become an outage

When I change IP addresses on a device or on a server, I have to wait for Auvik to figure out that change. It will tell me the device is offline until Auvik scans the whole subnet again and finds it. If I change 25 devices, I'll get 50 emails in a short time because they've gone offline. I'd love the ability to change that where I can update that device with the IP address without it going offline. That goes against the idea of a system that dynamically scans. It's information overload sometimes when you need to change a bunch of factors. You get inundated with emails. I would almost love a button whenever you first log in that says maintenance window, and then it would maybe take some of those alerts away. It's fairly intuitive but sometimes you have to search for things because it's hidden in the user interface, so I think that could be improved a little bit. The search could be better because they have these strange search terms. Instead of being able to look for what you want, you have to lay out the query in a specific way to get results. We've also been dealing with some weird bugs lately. We get alerts on miscellaneous items that go offline and online all the time. I've reached out to support, and they said that they've got a fix that they rolled out. However, we're still experiencing the issue, so I've got to work with them to fix that. They seem to be on top of the support.

Read full review

Sathis-Kumar

Senior Manager at Bank of America

Customized dashboards streamline log monitoring needs

Splunk is primarily used for log monitoring, where I collect all my security logs, system logs, and application logs into a centralized place. This helps me customize my monitoring models Splunk has provided me with a centralized platform to manage multiple features. Instead of using various…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The quick alerts in the event the equipment goes up or down is the most valuable feature."

"It's hard to say that one feature is my favorite, but I like Auvik's ability to map networks using SNMP. It maps the network, so I can look at all the devices and set them to provide alerts or automatically create tickets when outages occur. If clients need it, I can export all of the data into an Excel spreadsheet."

"The visibility that it provides is probably the most valuable feature because we need to know what our sites look like. Understanding what our sites look like and knowing about what kind of network gear or network equipment these sites are running is very important for us. Previously, we didn't have visibility into everything."

"The most valuable feature is the notification that alerts us to an offline server, whether the server is rebooting, resetting, or if we have network issues with the internet service provider."

"It is pretty responsive to whether things are up or down."

"One feature that is the most valuable for me is that after we added all of our firewalls, every time we make any configuration change in the firewall, it creates a backup and retains the change history for months. We can see and find out when a change was done and what was the change. The best part is that if we want to compare the current config with the config from two weeks ago, the tool pulls up both config files and tells us what the difference is."

"The monitoring and backup are the most valuable features."

"The switch backups are great. If a switch goes down or gets fried, we can just plug in a new switch and be good to go."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pros

"Overall, I would recommend Splunk to anyone seeking a monitoring solution, thanks to its extensive capabilities and features."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to customize dashboards based on my queries or any other customization I may need."

Cons

"It should be easier to see Mac addresses."

"It would be cool if they came out with an app, but running the browser isn't bad."

"Auvik's UI, while informative, can be a hurdle for new users due to its complexity."

"I'm still undergoing the trial period. My only complaint is that I still don't understand what the license cost will be. More transparent pricing would be massive."

"I requested that Auvik implement an alarm system to notify me immediately of any disruptions or anomalies."

"We use a service called Tailscale, a peer-to-peer private networking tool. My biggest issue with Auvik was getting it to scan devices across the Tailscale network. I suspect it's not supported there. That would be a valuable extension for us."

"I would like to see improvement in terms of its integration with other applications and systems. I know that they are adding new systems. However, there is still work to be done there, such as integration with MS Teams. That is not working great for us."

"The quality of technical support varies greatly."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) cons

"In future updates, I would like to see more predefined monitoring query solutions, which could be more effective."

"Technical support is good but could be improved, particularly concerning the time taken for ticket resolution."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a lot of problems with licensing in many other solutions, but I've never run into a problem with Auvik licensing. That's a pretty good vote of confidence."

"If you're a small company, Auvik is probably quite reasonable. But we've got 500 servers, so pricing suddenly became a lot more of an issue. There needs to be better bulk pricing for it."

"Its pricing is very reasonable. We had looked at other solutions where you pay based on the amount of traffic that was filtered through and analyzed. With Auvik, we pay by a billable device. We're not paying based on every single device we have. For one of the locations I have, one network element would likely be a billable device. So, every billable device has a network element, but not every network element is a billable device. If I have a location that has 50 network elements, then maybe 30 of them are billable devices. PCs, VoIP phones, and access points are monitored at no charge."

"I don't know how much the solution costs, but the fact that we've moved almost all of our customers over to it means it must be worth the value. Our platforms are costly, but we switched to Auvik, so the company must see it as cost-effective."

"The pricing was a little bit higher. They can work on that as everybody wants to save money."

"I'm not on the procurement side, but I understand that the license is based on devices, not sensors. If you have 10 switches and one firewall, you count per device. You'll have 100 devices if there are 10 sites with the same setup. I think it's a lot more expensive to monitor 100 sensors in PRTG."

"I believe that Auvik is one of the most expensive tools, but it is also the best."

"Auvik's pricing... is pretty competitive."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,491 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Government

13%

Insurance Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Auvik?

The most valuable feature for us in Auvik is the network topology.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auvik?

Auvik is pricey, and we were paying a lot for it, especially when compared to SolarWinds.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Auvik?

The network maps can be confusing due to the wide scope of the network, making it difficult to find specific details. Improvements in the network exclusions part would be helpful, as well as enhanc...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Splunk Synthetic Monitoring?

Splunk is a bit expensive since it charges based on the indexing rate of data. However, considering the features it provides, the pricing is quite affordable compared to other monitoring solutions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Splunk Synthetic Monitoring?

I'm still experiencing some features of the product. However, in future updates, I would like to see more predefined monitoring query solutions, which could be more effective.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Splunk Synthetic Monitoring?

Splunk is primarily used for log monitoring, where I collect all my security logs, system logs, and application logs into a centralized place. This helps me customize my monitoring models.

See all answers

Comparisons

Domotz vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 14% of the time

Zabbix vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 12% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 11% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 7% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 6% of the time

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) Competitors

Cribl vs Splunk Synthetic Monitoring

Compared 34% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Splunk Synthetic Monitoring

Compared 21% of the time

SigNoz vs Splunk Synthetic Monitoring

Compared 17% of the time

SCOM vs Splunk Synthetic Monitoring

Compared 16% of the time

New Relic vs Splunk Synthetic Monitoring

Compared 12% of the time

More Splunk Synthetic Monitoring Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

May 2025

Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

April 2025

Download Splunk Synthetic Monitoring product report

Overview

Auvik is a network management software that provides real-time visibility and control over network infrastructure.

It automates network mapping, monitoring, and troubleshooting, allowing IT teams to easily identify and resolve issues.

With its intuitive interface and powerful features, Auvik helps businesses optimize their network performance and ensure smooth operations.

Auvik

Customers use Splunk Synthetic Monitoring to proactively monitor application performance, simulate user interactions, and identify potential issues before impacting end-users. They appreciate its ability to provide detailed insights into application behavior and detect downtime early.

Splunk Synthetic Monitoring is highly valued for real-time alerts and comprehensive data analysis, helping businesses ensure optimal functionality and user experience. It offers precise error tracking, insightful analytics, and robust network monitoring capabilities. Users benefit from simulating user interactions, which enhance performance assessment and issue resolution. The customizable alert system and in-depth reporting contribute to improved operational efficiency. Automated test execution and scheduling provide seamless continuity for processes, while its comprehensive dashboards facilitate real-time data visualization and troubleshooting.

What are the key features?

Precise Error Tracking: Helps in identifying and rectifying specific issues efficiently.
Insightful Analytics: Provides actionable insights through in-depth data analysis.
Robust Network Monitoring: Ensures optimal network performance by identifying bottlenecks.
User Interaction Simulation: Enhances performance assessment by mimicking real user behavior.
Customizable Alert System: Allows tailored notifications for varying needs and priorities.
In-depth Reporting: Facilitates thorough operational reviews and decision-making.
Automated Test Execution and Scheduling: Ensures processes continue uninterrupted.
Comprehensive Dashboards: Supports real-time data visualization and troubleshooting.

What are the benefits and ROI?

Improved Operational Efficiency: Streamlines processes and reduces downtime.
Better Issue Resolution: Quickly identifies and resolves problems.
Enhanced Performance Assessment: Provides a detailed understanding of application behavior.
Proactive Monitoring: Detects issues before they impact end-users.
Real-time Alerts: Keeps teams informed and responsive to changes.
Accurate Data Analysis: Offers reliable insights for better decision-making.

Splunk Synthetic Monitoring finds implementation across diverse industries, offering tailored solutions to unique requirements. In finance, it helps ensure the reliability of trading platforms, while in healthcare, it aids in maintaining the uptime of critical health applications. E-commerce businesses use it to simulate user interactions, ensuring seamless shopping experiences.

Splunk

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Auvik, Datadog and others in Network Monitoring Software. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,491 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.