Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Domotz comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Juniper Mist Premium Analytics
Sponsored
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
60th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Auvik Network Management (ANM)
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
3rd
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
172
Ranking in other categories
IT Infrastructure Monitoring (3rd), Network Troubleshooting (3rd), Cloud Monitoring Software (4th), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (3rd)
Domotz
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
82nd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the market share of Juniper Mist Premium Analytics is 0.4% and it decreased by 34.8% compared to the previous year. The market share of Auvik Network Management (ANM) is 1.1% and it increased by 3.0% compared to the previous year. The market share of Domotz is 0.6% and it increased by 152.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
0.6%
Network Troubleshooting
2.7%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Shiva_Prasad - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 25, 2024
A cloud solution for warehousing with a troubleshooting feature
The initial setup is straightforward. It's based on user requirements. We also conduct heat mapping using a couple of tools. The only requirement is to understand the technical or configuration aspects from the user's end and then configure it. Mist takes no more than 15 to 20 minutes for a particular deployment. You need to understand the end user's environment and have a concrete plan on whether it's a greenfield installation or an existing one, considering the density and height. Based on that, we need to develop a passive heat map. Then, you need to discuss with the user to understand exactly what needs to be configured and what they require in their environment. Based on that, you can proceed with the installation. Additionally, you can perform post-installation heat mapping to ensure it matches the earlier heat map. I rate the initial setup an eight out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy.
DF
Apr 26, 2024
It helps us troubleshoot bandwidth issues quickly and back up our configurations
We were having bandwidth issues on parts of our network and didn't have a central point to investigate these problems before Auviv. We were inspecting logs, jotting things down, looking at error calendars, and doing everything manually. It took forever. Auvik helps us have more visibility in nearly real-time. We realized the benefits almost immediately. There are fewer bandwidth problems because we can identify the bottlenecks quickly and resolve them, so I think that has reduced strain on the help desk. Our resolution time is several hours faster because we don't need to manually compare error logs and stuff like that.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."
"It's priced fairly, avoiding any underestimation of its value."
"The pricing gets pretty expensive because it is per device that is managed. It is not per site, so it can get pricey."
"Auvik is a cost-efficient solution for the applications we use it for."
"From a client perspective, pricing is always an issue. Nobody wants to pay more than necessary. You need to be aware of the number of billable managed products, because they will greatly increase the cost of Auvik..."
"Auvik's pretty good in terms of pricing. It can get pricey if you have multiple managed devices, but if it's just a simple network with only one or two firewall walls and smart switches, it's reasonable."
"They're very competitive on the pricing front. They may not be the least expensive, but they're certainly not the most expensive. They're right in a sweet spot. For our organization, at least, it was right within the budget."
"Auvik is billed by network device. They bill our firewalls and networks. However, there are devices that are not subject to billing in our environment, such as PCs, phones, and printers."
"Auvik tends to be on the pricier side."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
787,560 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
19%
Construction Company
11%
Educational Organization
9%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Retailer
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Juniper Mist Premium Analytics?
We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points.
What do you like most about Auvik?
The most valuable feature for us in Auvik is the network topology.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auvik?
I like that you only have to pay for a minimum of five systems with an account, and you can monitor server software f...
What needs improvement with Auvik?
We schedule backups in the middle of the night, and a high volume of data passes through our networks during those ba...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software. Updated: June 2024.
787,560 professionals have used our research since 2012.