Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs NetMon comparison

Auvik and Exabeam are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Auvik is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6, while Exabeam is ranked #53 with an average rating of 7.5. Auvik holds a 1.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to Exabeam’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Auvik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Exabeam users who would recommend it.

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Read 208 Auvik Network Management (ANM) reviews

16,097 Views
11,107 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

NetMon

Read 12 NetMon reviews

2,473 Views
2,003 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

NetMon

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 1, 2026

NetMon and Auvik Network Management (ANM) are competing network management solutions. ANM seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set, which many find worth the additional expense, especially for larger networks requiring diverse functionalities.

Features: NetMon offers customizable alerts, network traffic analysis, and device monitoring. ANM provides automated network mapping, configuration backups, and multi-tenancy capabilities.

Room for Improvement: NetMon could improve its feature scope to better compete with comprehensive solutions like ANM, provide more advanced analytics capabilities, and enhance its scalability for larger networks. ANM could refine its user interface for better navigation, streamline processes to reduce resource intensity, and optimize its alerting system to minimize false positives.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetMon offers straightforward deployment with responsive customer support, making it accessible for small teams. ANM provides advanced deployment with strong remote management options and detailed support resources, catering to complex needs.

Pricing and ROI: NetMon features competitive pricing and quick ROI due to lower setup costs. ANM, despite higher initial expenditure, justifies its price with long-term benefits, particularly for larger networks.

To learn more, read our detailed Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. NetMon Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. NetMon

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

2nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

208

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (3rd), Network Troubleshooting (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (4th), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (2nd)

NetMon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

53rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Auvik Network Management (ANM) is 1.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetMon is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Auvik Network Management (ANM)	1.3%
NetMon	0.6%
Other	98.1%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Wahaj Memon

System Engineer Tier 4

Real-time alerting enhances network monitoring, but interface and network mapping need improvement

The interface is good yet could be improved. There are many elements that could be changed in the interface itself. There should be some sort of chart or alerting within the dashboard. In the overview section, these features are currently absent. When you get an alert, you must go to notifications, then within the device to identify the issue. It would be beneficial if everything was visible immediately upon logging in to the overview, such as machine performance and other metrics. Regarding the network map and visibility, there are some issues. Many people have mentioned that the network map needs improvement, especially when handling numerous items. Currently, I have everything in place: printers, monitors, laptops, switches, and access points. However, I have three switches showing outside of the loop without explanation. This issue is persistent, not occasional. These switches appear disconnected in the corner, even though they are connected and online according to other platforms. The presentation aspect needs significant improvement. We have government-related clients, and taking a screenshot of the current network mapping to send to them appears unprofessional. Although Auvik Network Management (ANM) provides network mapping, I still need to create my own network diagram to make it presentable for clients.

Read full review

SumitRangari

Pan India IT Infrastructure Management / End-user Services at Tata Group

Has supported real-time event detection and reporting accuracy while database integration has required extra effort

Sometimes it may be difficult to incorporate new additional databases in NetMon, and we faced some challenges at that time. However, currently, it is not giving many challenges.It is difficult to integrate NetMon with other databases. We can customize NetMon's monitoring views, but it is done by the team who handles it, as it is outsourced.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a single, integrated platform and that is very important because the more tools that you can build into one product suite, the easier it is for your engineering staff to learn it."

"Auvik Network Management really helps with the overview of every switch or router in a location."

"Having one piece of software that has all that combined is really nice."

"At this point in time, it's an invaluable piece of what we do."

"The solution provides detailed device information, including serial numbers, configurations, IP, warranty status, and when the device was purchased. This is very helpful when it comes to replacing old devices."

"The dashboard and the network map give a real-time picture."

"I like the way that it auto-configures itself to do the mapping."

"I have found Auvik extremely stable. They do a lot of scheduled maintenance, but it's almost always on the weekends, so it doesn't impact us."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pros

"The protocols with which you see the traffic for a particular website that a client has in their environment, for example, are valuable. We can monitor whether the traffic is up to the mark or whether they need to add more bandwidth. Also, we can see if we're able to get real-time environment data as well. The customization dashboard is really good. LogRhythm NetMon has its own in-built dashboards which are helpful in guiding customization."

"The analytics feature is the most valuable feature."

"Visibility is a valuable feature, the ability to see even if the traffic is not going into the firewall"

"We were sold on the product based on the fairly narrow use cases that the sales reps gave us, and what we're seeing during our usage is that we can get there, and we're very excited about the potential."

"The analytics feature is the most valuable feature."

"NetMon's best feature is traffic analysis."

"In general, this is a good product."

"Compared to many other products in the market, I think LogRhythm has the highest cost to performance ratio in terms of its value."

More NetMon pros

Cons

"It would be helpful to be able to send CLI commands to multiple devices in Auvik simultaneously."

"It would be cool if they came out with an app, but running the browser isn't bad."

"It would be helpful if it integrates more with Windows Server event logs and other types of logs."

"The automation side needs improvement... A really important one was about a SonicWall firewall that needs to be rebooted every single month. You can do that in the SonicWall GUI, but you can't do it in Auvik. Hundreds of people have endorsed the idea of having an automated command line interface command run on any device that supports it."

"Some improvements in the spacing on the network map would be good."

"Its integration with IT Glue is absolute garbage. I would never recommend it to anybody who utilizes IT Glue."

"I like the auto-mapping feature, but I would like to see more layouts and predefined views."

"I don't know that there are any remote tools for directly connecting to workstations through Auvik."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) cons

"LogRhythm NetMon's pricing model is an area of concern that should be made a little bit cheaper in comparison to the other players in the market currently."

"There is an issue with tunneling in relation to how the connectivity is established between the end devices and where NetMon is installed. On the console, I often observe that there's a difference of a few seconds or maybe a minute, and this lag time should not be there."

"The training for this product is not very good and needs to be improved."

"The main concern is that LogRhythm has not improved NetMon but instead introduced a separate product, which many customers, including us, would prefer to be integrated into a single platform for easier management."

"Previously, it was typically every Monday that I was coming in - it would die over the weekend - and I would spend a day cleaning up databases."

"Their technical support isn't so great."

"Some of the automated tasks we can perform on QRadar cannot be performed on LogRhythm because the solution has limitations."

"Sometimes it's hard to find the network devices' self-audit logs."

More NetMon cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It was worth every penny that we paid for it. It's not necessarily the cheapest. I don't know what its current price is. I haven't been involved in the pricing part of it for a couple of years. I know that a couple of years ago, it was a bit pricey, but it saved us many times over the cost that we were paying for it."

"For the size of our school, it is expensive, but I understand the reason behind the pricing."

"The pricing is kind of steep, but it's worth the price. There's no beating around the bush. It's an expensive solution, but it's really the best solution there is for us."

"Auvik is not cheap. They've done a great job, it's a developed product, but you pay for it. When you compare, it's definitely in the upper-tier of pricing."

"Auvik is probably one of the more expensive options on the market for what it does. But if, as a managed services provider, you are working with clients that have large networks with large numbers of network devices, you can find efficiency to be gained that will make that value up."

"For us, it has been good. I do not get too much into the pricing side. We are an MSP, so we have a number of clients, and we are utilizing Auvik as a way for us to be able to better manage and support our clients. The more clients we bring into Auvik, the better the pricing, so we have been happy with how it is."

"They charge for switches and some networking hardware, but everything else is free."

"Auvik is billed by network device. They bill our firewalls and networks. However, there are devices that are not subject to billing in our environment, such as PCs, phones, and printers."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pricing and cost advice

"Pricing is okay. There were some competitors that were extremely expensive and there were some which were really inexpensive but LogRhythm stayed in the middle of them."

"LogRhythm's licensing part is something that depends on the license you want since they offer it on a perpetual and subscription basis."

"NetMon's licensing costs about $85k per year, with some extra costs for support."

"The price of this solution is too high, so it should be made more practical and more valuable for the customer."

"The product is expensive for smaller companies."

"I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Transportation Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	146
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	23

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auvik?

Auvik Network Management (ANM) is not costly, but pricing is based on how many licenses are taken, and that can be improved.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Auvik?

One improvement that would be really beneficial for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is the ability to get alerts sent to me via text. Right now, the only alerts I can get are via email. Receiving al...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Auvik?

My main use case for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is managing our overall network and being able to have insight into all of the devices, switches, servers, firewalls, and access points on the ne...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogRhythm NetMon?

I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LogRhythm NetMon?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LogRhythm NetMon?

We have outsourced our SIEM solutions at the moment, and we are using it.We have been using LogRhythm in our organization as a SaaS offering. We have outsourced it as part of the actual scope where...

See all answers

Comparisons

Kentik vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 6% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 5% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

Wireshark vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs NetMon

Compared 6% of the time

Ixia CloudLens vs NetMon

Compared 6% of the time

ObserverLIVE vs NetMon

Compared 5% of the time

Niagara Visibility Controller vs NetMon

Compared 5% of the time

SCOM vs NetMon

Compared 5% of the time

More NetMon Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

May 2026

Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) product report

Buyer's Guide

NetMon

April 2026

Download NetMon product report

Also Known As

No data available

LogRhythm Network Monitor

Overview

Auvik Network Management offers competitive pricing for essential network and infrastructure device management, providing robust features valued by enterprises.

Auvik Network Management delivers comprehensive network visibility and management through intuitive auditing, alerting, and discovery functionalities. It eases troubleshooting, automates configuration backups, and includes a user-friendly interface for effective monitoring and management. With real-time alerts and customizable notifications, IT operations are streamlined, while remote access capabilities enhance time efficiency. ANM supports integration with other platforms, effectively maintaining device inventories and visualizing network topology.

What are the key features of Auvik Network Management?

Auditing: Offers comprehensive network audits, ensuring accuracy and efficiency.
Network Discovery: Simplifies the process of identifying network components.
Alerting Modules: Provides real-time alerts and customizable notifications.
Configuration Backups: Automates backups, safeguarding configurations.
Remote Access: Streamlines network management from any location.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Auvik Network Management?

Enhanced Network Visibility: Offers detailed insights into network operations.
Time Efficiency: Remote access and automated features save valuable time.
Proactive Issue Identification: Real-time monitoring aids in identifying issues quickly.
Integration Support: Works cohesively with other platforms, easing management.
Operational Efficiency: Automates management tasks for improved productivity.

In industries such as IT management and network administration, Auvik Network Management is predominantly utilized for overseeing and maintaining network infrastructures across multiple locations. It offers capabilities for monitoring network topology, receiving alerts on device downtimes, and managing performance metrics. Users employ its features for proactive issue identification, and auditing, helping maintain oversight of networks containing switches, routers, and firewalls. Auvik provides remote access and automated backups, which contribute to enhanced operational efficiency and network visibility.

Auvik

NetMon offers significant capabilities in log aggregation, traffic analysis, and real-time network insights. Its ease of use accommodates both entry-level and advanced functionalities, enhancing network visibility and threat detection.

NetMon provides seamless analytics with its real-time dashboards and advanced AI integration. The platform is designed for comprehensive monitoring and detailed analysis, making it indispensable for identifying network traffic, origins, destinations, and facilitating threat detection through lateral traffic visibility. Despite its powerful analytics and customization features, improvements in product integration, customer support, and pricing could increase its competitive edge. Connectivity, topology visualization, and server performance are areas noted for enhancement. Integration with protocols like Gflow and Netflow might alleviate agent-based restriction challenges. NetMon sends correlated data to LogRhythm SIEM for enhanced threat analysis and is used for tasks like traffic analysis and DPA.

What are NetMon's key features?

Log Aggregation: Seamless collection of diverse network logs for analysis.
Traffic Analysis: Detailed inspection of network traffic for identifying irregular patterns.
AI Integration: Advanced analytics powered by robust AI capabilities.
Customizable Dashboards: Real-time insights tailored to user requirements.
Correlation Engine: In-depth correlation of network activity for comprehensive reports.
Deep Packet Analytics: Thorough examination of data packets for granular insights.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Threat Detection: Significant improvements in identifying lateral threats.
Comprehensive Insights: Complete visibility into network and user activities.
Efficient Monitoring: Real-time analytics streamline network monitoring processes.
Compliance Support: Strong integration supports adherence to compliance standards.

NetMon is widely adopted in industries requiring detailed traffic monitoring and security, such as finance and healthcare. Its capabilities in traffic type identification and correlated analysis make it essential for environments where detecting irregular patterns is critical. It's utilized for network security through comprehensive analysis and integration with SIEM systems.

Exabeam

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Sera-Brynn

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. NetMon

April 2026

Free Report: Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. NetMon

Find out what your peers are saying about Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. NetMon and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. NetMon report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.