AutomationEdge vs UiPath Platform comparison

AutomationEdge and UiPath are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. AutomationEdge is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.0, while UiPath is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5. AutomationEdge holds a 1.1% mindshare in RPA, compared to UiPath’s 12.9% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of AutomationEdge users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

AutomationEdge

Read 16 AutomationEdge reviews

1,099 Views
1,066 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

UiPath Platform

Read 911 UiPath Platform reviews

26,806 Views
24,930 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

AutomationEdge

UiPath Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

UiPath and AutomationEdge are competing products in the robotic process automation (RPA) category, with UiPath generally having the upper hand due to its stronger community support, comprehensive feature set, and ease of use, making it accessible for non-technical users.

Features: UiPath offers a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, an extensive library of pre-built activities, AI-driven Document Understanding, and seamless integration with platforms like Microsoft Office, AWS, and Salesforce. It also features robust Orchestrator for managing bots and comes with comprehensive training via UiPath Academy. AutomationEdge provides excellent Excel automation capabilities, efficient data massaging, and advanced AI features with DocuEdge for document handling, supporting a wide range of scripts, including Python and Java.

Room for Improvement: UiPath could enhance scalability when handling large data volumes and streamline its transition process for community users to Enterprise, as well as improve integration with certain stacks. AutomationEdge might benefit from improving its AI capabilities to match competitors like UiPath and optimizing performance with large data sets, including expanding its community resources for better engagement and support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: UiPath is praised for its smooth deployment process, supported by comprehensive documentation, cloud-based solutions, and an active user community that aids in troubleshooting. Its customer service is recognized for providing timely expert support. AutomationEdge provides seamless deployment and a straightforward workflow system, backed by strong user support, although its community interaction may not be as extensive as UiPath's.

Pricing and ROI: UiPath operates on a flexible subscription model with a free Community Edition, offering substantial ROI by reducing manual errors and increasing efficiency, making significant savings in enterprise settings. AutomationEdge is known for being more affordable, offering cost-effective solutions that deliver valuable ROI, particularly for smaller projects, although it sometimes requires additional investment in AI functionalities to match competitors.

To learn more, read our detailed AutomationEdge vs. UiPath Platform Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AutomationEdge vs. UiPath Platform

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,360 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AutomationEdge

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

26th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UiPath Platform

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

1st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

911

Ranking in other categories

Agentic Automation (2nd), AI-Agent Builders (1st), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (1st), AI Finance & Accounting (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of AutomationEdge is 1.1%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Platform is 12.9%, down from 24.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
UiPath Platform	12.9%
AutomationEdge	1.1%
Other	86.0%

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

Jajati Panda

Software Engineer at Apmosys

Delivers increased productivity and streamlines fraud processing in banking, though technical support could be faster

Before AutomationEdge, we had to hire coder-level experts with Java or Python knowledge. This approach took considerable time and required error handling to automate processes. With this tool, all processes are automatically handled with errors, and no-code automation is available. The cost for a developer is now significantly lower. Previously, we hired highly efficient developers with high salary packages. The license cost of 5 to 10 lakhs per year for one person to automate is equivalent to a person's annual salary. With the license and a developer hired at 3 to 5 lakhs, we can automate 40 to 50 processes.

Read full review

reviewer2761431

Manager Rpa at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Significantly reduces manual effort and improves team workflows through automated ticketing

We've used Agent Builder, IXP, and Maestro for orchestration. We have created context-grounded searches or chatbots using context grounding, and we also use context grounding within an Agentic flow where a bot or agent reads ServiceNow tickets to determine whether it has been assigned to the right work group. If it has not been assigned correctly due to human error, it automatically reassigns it to the right group. I would assess Agentic AI's ability to extract data points as effective. We created an agent for the purpose of extracting data, though not in a document. We created what we call an email conversation agent that engages with a customer, vendor, or someone in an email conversation with a set goal of extracting specific data points for an action to be performed subsequently. The one automation we have deployed in production involves the agent interacting with team members to collect data points and create a ServiceNow ticket. We appreciate almost all features of UiPath Platform, with one of the most successful ones being the use of Coms Mining. Most of the new features related to AI have all been good, and we use Agentic. We have already created a few agents and have started to use Maestro for a few flows, though we are not yet there to orchestrate an end-to-end workflow. We have good ROI from the automations we have developed with UiPath Platform, which far exceeds the investment in the platform. It has saved us tens of thousands of hours in manual effort, making the team members happy to pursue other things of value.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...I rate the technical support of the solution a nine out of ten."

"It helps us with cost optimization and easy implementation."

"AutomationEdge has shown the most productive impact, and the productivity was excellent before, and now it can increase by 20 to 30% more with AI implementation."

"If we want to change your processes, we can code it from scratch, making it a beneficial feature of the product."

"The ability to automate our processes with external plug-ins and zero code is the most valuable feature."

"AutomationEdge is really easy to use because the workflows are simple."

"Attended versus unattended automation in AutomationEdge has benefited my organization significantly."

"The studio design is fine compared to other similar products. There is nothing extraordinary about it, but at the same time, there are not any negatives."

More AutomationEdge pros

"UiPath is great for desktop automation because it integrates well with applications and we are able to tailor selectors to our needs."

"UiPath takes the complexity out of automation by using a low-code approach."

"I really like that I am able to tell the story, using Orchestrator, how humans work, how bots work, and how humans and bots work together."

"In terms of ROI, we are saving more than what the platform costs us. We are at about 1.5 million in savings due to a recent automation. It was a little less than that before. These are soft savings and don't show up on balance sheets. We're trying to work toward automations that actually do lead to hard savings. We've saved about 43,000 hours in a year so far."

"UiPath is a user-friendly solution."

"The UI Explorer in the UiPath Studio is valuable. We can get a unique and dynamic selector for every element in the UI, which is helpful for me in finding out a particular UI element. Most of my automations have had UI interactions. So, I found it the most helpful feature."

"The option to record processes is the most important feature of UiPath. We can use it to record every action automatically and it is then converted to a workflow. This workflow defines the complete set of processes so that we can automate every requirement."

"For our organization, the Orchestrator has the most useful setup. All automation is more or less the same. With UiPath, the difference is the Orchestrator. The amount of integration it has is actually what makes it different from all other vendors."

More UiPath Platform pros

Cons

"There are some shortcomings in the product's stability that need improvement."

"When compared with other tools such as Automation Anywhere and UIPath, they are more stable than AutomationEdge."

"Regarding stability and reliability, AutomationEdge is mid-range. When compared with other tools such as Automation Anywhere and UIPath, they are more stable than AutomationEdge."

"It's not an intuitive tool."

"They could provide more technologies for IT and security to enhance machine learning capabilities."

"The price of the solution could be improved."

"The ease of use is the main thing on which they really have to focus. If they want to go against the giants, it should be improved in ease of use, and it should be more user-friendly. It would be helpful because everyone should be empowered irrespective of whether they know how to code or not. They should enhance its user interface and make it more intuitive."

"With other automation solutions in the market, we can simulate the process in our notebooks where the solution creates the code for us, but with AutomationEdge we can't do this."

More AutomationEdge cons

"The pricing of particularly on the bot licenses is placed to maximize revenue forUiPath and is not in the best interests of the customer. For example, if I have 150 robots, our utilization of that is about 27% as my demands come in spikes. Most of the robots sit there doing nothing, and I paid for them."

"My opinion on how UiPath Platform can be improved is that I dislike cloud or web apps in general, so getting all of the cool cloud features for Studio Cloud into Studio Desktop would be my biggest priority, however, that's a personal vendetta against web applications."

"The only thing which I see is missing, is it does not have an inbuilt machine learning. You have to teach the bot. The bot is not self-learning."

"As far as stability is concerned, I'm not sure what people who have deployments of hundreds or thousands of bots are seeing in terms of stability. We're small. For a small implementation, we've had a few hiccups and a few concerns where I would say, how can we triage more quickly, or how can we understand what we've caused more quickly?"

"With on-prem, we cannot utilize all the new features such as AI Agent or many functions on the cloud."

"The Citrix automation - the way that it's fragile right now - if that could be made stronger and more stable, that would be icing on the cake for UiPath."

"I would like it to be more user-friendly."

"Dynamic Selectors should have a specific chapter apart, as most of the tools are currently driven as such."

More UiPath Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Price-wise, AutomationEdge is pretty affordable, making it not so expensive when you compare this with other tools in the market."

"I give the price of the solution a nine out of ten."

"The product is available at the lowest price."

"The licensing for this solution should have a more competitive pricing model. The price is in the top five of similar products."

"If you are looking for a budget solution, you can consider AE. It has all the features. Scaling it is way easier because of the cost itself."

"Pricing can be made better. Currently, I think the pricing is based on the market. The pricing also depends on the business partners that offer you the solution."

"It is expensive but its value can justify the cost."

"UiPath is on the higher side compared to Microsoft Power Automate and Automation Anywhere."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The licensing is very affordable, especially when you compare its benefits. I know that AI units are purchased separately. We are still trying to figure out how to track our usage and which tier or plan to go with, but overall, it is affordable in comparison to other options."

"It is expensive. Every product or component is built separately. All the components have a separate fee. UiPath Studio has a license cost. The cloud has a license cost, and bots have a license cost. These costs are recurring on a yearly basis. So, every product or component has to be licensed for a year, and on expiry, you have to renew it. Their licensing structure should be improved. The cost of a bot is a lot. It is more expensive as compared to some of the competitors. It is probably $8,000 for an unattended bot."

"This solution is worth the investment."

"I can't speak to the exact price, however, recently I heard in a meeting that one license for Studio Path costs 2,825 Euros per year. This price is approximate and may fluctuate."

"UiPath's cost can be prohibitive, and the sheer number of licensing options they offer makes it difficult to choose the right one, creating a confusing selection process."

"The license cost is expensive because we have to pay for each tenant."

More UiPath Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Media Company

10%

Healthcare Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	249
Midsize Enterprise	143
Large Enterprise	667

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AutomationEdge?

I rate AutomationEdge's pricing as a six to seven. It is expensive but its value can justify the cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AutomationEdge?

In AutomationEdge, I think there could be improvements. I have not used it in maybe two months, but in the past, you needed to put code JavaScript or similar programming languages. The variables so...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AutomationEdge?

My use cases for AutomationEdge include using two automations in my actual employment or company. I use it to create a user in the Active Directory. I create a website, and the user fills out the f...

See all answers

Best RPA tools for IBM iSeries

I can only speak to UiPath since that is the only RPA solution that I have used. I know that there are specific packages that you can integrate into your project that is specifically made to work w...

See all answers

RPA that Bots can run without centralized control?

Yes, Attended Bots which can run without centralized control Module. RPA Tools like Automation Anywhere, uiPath ,Power Automation they do support this.

See all answers

How do I choose between UiPath and Microsoft Power Automate?

Microsoft‌ ‌Power‌ ‌Automate‌ ‌is‌ ‌intuitive‌ ‌and‌ ‌easy‌ ‌to‌ ‌integrate‌ ‌and‌ ‌use.‌ ‌I‌ ‌like‌ ‌that‌ ‌there‌ ‌is‌ ‌no‌ ‌coding‌ ‌experience‌ ‌necessary,‌ ‌and‌ ‌appreciate‌ ‌the‌ ‌automated‌...

See all answers

Comparisons

Automation Anywhere vs AutomationEdge

Compared 29% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs AutomationEdge

Compared 18% of the time

Blue Prism vs AutomationEdge

Compared 13% of the time

BotFarm vs AutomationEdge

Compared 11% of the time

More AutomationEdge Competitors

Microsoft Power Automate vs UiPath Platform

Compared 14% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs UiPath Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Blue Prism vs UiPath Platform

Compared 7% of the time

ServiceNow Automation Engine vs UiPath Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Pega Robotic Process Automation vs UiPath Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More UiPath Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AutomationEdge

January 2026

Download AutomationEdge product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Platform

January 2026

Download UiPath Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

UiPath Maestro, UiPath Apps, UiPath Agent Builder

Overview

AutomationEdge is an Intelligent Robotic Process Automation product which comes bundled with key essential technologies for automation of front office, middle office, back office and IT operations.
AutomationEdge provides Chatbots, Intelligent Automation bots, AI and Machine Learning capabilities that help clients reduce costs, improve response time, grow business and achieve compliance. AutomationEdge provides ready Bots and development environment to build new Bots.

AutomationEdge

UiPath Platform is appreciated for its user-friendly interface and extensive automation capabilities, offering seamless integration with diverse applications. Its intuitive drag-and-drop functionality enables users to design efficient workflows with minimal technical expertise.

UiPath Platform delivers a robust set of features that enhance automation and productivity. With components like Orchestrator, task management is optimized, facilitating better scalability. Users benefit from advanced AI and document understanding tools, boosting data handling accuracy and reducing errors. Despite its strengths, UiPath faces challenges with upgrading processes, AI enhancements, and user documentation. Integration and selector sensitivity issues, along with support and licensing complexities, highlight areas for potential improvement. Users request smoother deployment, error handling, and migration processes. Enhanced support for RHEL/Ubuntu, LINQ, and Lambda and improved real-time insights, automation recording, and scheduling are desired. Streamlining the experience for non-technical users with simplified workflows remains a priority.

What are the key features of UiPath Platform?

Drag-and-Drop Functionality: Allows users to design workflows easily without extensive technical skills.
Orchestrator: Enhances task management and enables scalable automation.
AI and Document Understanding: Improves data accuracy and minimizes errors.
System Integration: Offers seamless integration with SAP, CRM, Oracle, and more.
Active Community and Training: UiPath Academy provides resources for skill development.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Increased Efficiency: Reduction in manual workloads through automation of repetitive tasks.
Improved Accuracy: Enhanced data handling capabilities reduce errors.
Productivity Boost: Supports both attended and unattended automations to streamline operations.
Scalability: Ability to handle growing automation demands efficiently.
Integration Benefits: Easy integration with enterprise systems for streamlined operations.

UiPath Platform is widely implemented across sectors such as finance, healthcare, insurance, HR, IT, and supply chain to automate repetitive business tasks. Common uses include automating data entry, invoice processing, document management, report generation, and customer service operations. Organizations value the platform's ability to integrate seamlessly with systems like SAP, CRM, and Oracle, allowing for enhanced efficiency and accuracy in processing both structured and unstructured data.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Smart Dubai Government (SDG)

1. Accenture 2. Deloitte 3. PwC 4. IBM 5. Capgemini 6. KPMG 7. Ernst & Young 8. Infosys 9. Cognizant 10. Wipro 11. Tata Consultancy Services 12. HCL Technologies 13. Genpact 14. Tech Mahindra 15. DXC Technology 16. Atos 17. NTT Data 18. CGI 19. L&T Infotech 20. Hexaware Technologies 21. Mindtree 22. Mphasis 23. Virtusa 24. Syntel 25. Zensar Technologies 26. WNS Global Services 27. Hexaware Technologies 28. Larsen & Toubro Infotech 29. Persistent Systems 30. QuEST Global 31. Sonata Software 32. Zensar Technologies

Buyer's Guide

AutomationEdge vs. UiPath Platform

December 2025

Free Report: AutomationEdge vs. UiPath Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about AutomationEdge vs. UiPath Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AutomationEdge vs. UiPath Platform report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.