Aurea CX Messenger vs SAP NetWeaver comparison

Aurea and SAP are both solutions in the SOA Governance category. Aurea is ranked #4, while SAP is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.5. Aurea holds a 7.4% mindshare in SG, compared to SAP’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Aurea users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Aurea CX Messenger

Read 7 Aurea CX Messenger reviews

831 Views
141 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP NetWeaver

Read 16 SAP NetWeaver reviews

318 Views
134 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Aurea CX Messenger

SAP NetWeaver

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aurea CX Messenger and SAP NetWeaver based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two SOA Governance solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Aurea CX Messenger vs. SAP NetWeaver Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Aurea CX Messenger vs. SAP NetWeaver

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,497 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aurea CX Messenger

Ranking in SOA Governance

4th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Activity Monitoring (4th), Message Queue (MQ) Software (12th), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (14th), Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) (8th)

SAP NetWeaver

Ranking in SOA Governance

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the SOA Governance category, the mindshare of Aurea CX Messenger is 7.4%, up from 5.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP NetWeaver is 3.4%, down from 6.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

SOA Governance Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SAP NetWeaver	3.4%
Aurea CX Messenger	7.4%
Other	89.2%

SOA Governance

Featured Reviews

Radhey Rajput

Sr. IT Analyst at NCR Corporation

Lightweight and efficient solution

It's very good and lightweight. But, it does not provide web service communication. But it is excellent for internal connections One valuable feature is the messaging broker. If there is a disruption, it restores the messages. And when the application is running, it delivers all the messages. The…

Read full review

Bala Hamisu

Planner at Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation

Good for management and easily generate payslips at any point in time

We use NetWeaver for our appraisal process, the procedure for maybe benefits and emoluments. You can use it to generate your base leaves and other stuff. We mainly use it for human capital management or staff. Then we have a P2P, document signing, peer-to-peer. I've used those functions for a long…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution offers excellent stability."

"The Messenger Broker is a really good feature."

"The solution is highly scalable, this is very important for us. It can handle a lot of messages."

"ESB: Provides all kind of possibilities to resolve business needs. A lot of ready to use services plus custom Java services. I used a lot of them all."

"The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very easy to develop. Most of it is graphical, but we also have the option to add any custom call that you need."

"SDM: User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes, if required."

"The solution is scalable."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The flexibility and the customizability this solution has when adapting to our business requirements is a huge benefit."

"Finance and distribution are the most important features."

"We strongly rely on our SAP data. We need access to the information to analyze it, so the solution allows us to make use of the data that we get from SAP. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution."

"The integration feature is valuable."

"The presentation is the most valuable feature. It's very conceptual. We had to follow the instructions very strictly. It's a Dutch or German product and we had to follow it step-by-step."

"The human capital management module is valuable."

More SAP NetWeaver pros

Cons

"I don't know if the last version has the cloud option, but maybe that could be good. That could be something that is included."

"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."

"Aurea CX Messenger could improve by making better use of the new APIs"

"It should include/add more services with the product as per market demand. It should include custom Java services developed by any organization or provide a platform where users/developers can share ideas/custom services, etc."

"You should not hurry with upgrades without testing the whole product completely."

"The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services."

"The product documentation can be improved."

"Technical support response time was slow."

"Though SAP NetWeaver has been pretty stable and mature, some issues arose after some customizations, so that's an area for improvement."

"Scalability would be a good improvement in future releases, if they do release future versions. They tried to create a seamless style, but it's not necessarily scalable to big development environments that we're trying to achieve."

"The initial setup is a little complex. The users are not able to install the prerequisite drivers or are not able to follow the SOP because they don't have access to SAP Logon. If users already have access, it will take seven to 10 days to deploy the solution. If they do not, it may take a maximum of 25 to 30 days."

"The initial setup was not very easy."

"SAP NetWeaver should be better integrated with other products outside of SAP."

"SAP NetWeaver it's still complex for a normal user unless you memorize those action codes."

More SAP NetWeaver cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Much better than Oracle SOA Suite."

"You pay nothing for licensing, because the commercial model is a subscription. Other environments, such as QA and Development, are included in the subscription"

"The pricing is not so high."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a nine to ten since it is an expensive solution."

"The licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"It's a very expensive solution."

"SAP NetWeaver requires a license, but I'm not sure how the licenses and payments were coordinated."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which SOA Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Insurance Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Media Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about SAP NetWeaver?

The human capital management module is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP NetWeaver?

Software and hardware costs are typically handled by separate departments.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP NetWeaver?

It needs more improvement in terms of user-friendliness. SAP wasn't user-friendly at all. In interacting with it, it should have a more customizable interface. The interfaces aren't user-friendly, ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Oracle SOA Suite vs Aurea CX Messenger

Compared 28% of the time

TIBCO eFTL vs Aurea CX Messenger

Compared 28% of the time

ActiveMQ vs Aurea CX Messenger

Compared 25% of the time

IBM MQ vs Aurea CX Messenger

Compared 19% of the time

More Aurea CX Messenger Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Activity Monitoring

September 2025

Download Aurea CX Messenger product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP NetWeaver

August 2025

Download SAP NetWeaver product report

Also Known As

CX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQ

NetWeaver, SecurStore

Overview

CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

Aurea

SAP NetWeaver is an open application platfrom that provides a comprehensive set of tools and Web services technologies that support seamless enterprise application integration, master data management (MDM), system integration, and more.

SAP

Sample Customers

Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom Mortgage

Schaidt Innovations GmbH & Co. KG, Satellites Unlimited Inc., German Football Association, FMC Corporation, Deutscher Fu_ball-Bund

Buyer's Guide

Aurea CX Messenger vs. SAP NetWeaver

September 2025

Free Report: Aurea CX Messenger vs. SAP NetWeaver

Find out what your peers are saying about Aurea CX Messenger vs. SAP NetWeaver and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Aurea CX Messenger vs. SAP NetWeaver report.

See our list of best SOA Governance vendors.

We monitor all SOA Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.