No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

AuraQuantic vs Make comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.8
AuraQuantic enhances efficiency, speeds up tasks, optimizes resources, and boosts productivity and ROI through customization and automation.
Sentiment score
6.3
Make enhances ROI by automating tasks, reducing redundancy, saving time, and eliminating the need for additional staff.
I have indeed seen a return on investment as it has saved us hundreds of hours in repetitive tasks, streamlining our follow-up to the leads that we are generating.
Network Engineer at AT&T
I implemented a booking system for my client that previously required data to be entered directly into Google Sheets and reminders to be sent manually; using Make, they have saved about 50% of their time, which equals one labor resource, translating to a significant amount of money saved.
Founder at WebEase
The ROI is very high, as the business professionals are pleased with the results from automations, enjoying the time saved and the outputs received.
Lead- Tech and AI Automation at a healthcare company with 1-10 employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.5
AuraQuantic's customer service is praised for its responsiveness, professionalism, and knowledgeable support team that assists with implementation and troubleshooting.
Sentiment score
5.5
Make offers responsive customer service with effective support, community forums, and comprehensive resources, ensuring quick problem resolution.
Customer support is first-class; I have managed to resolve most of my issues through the community where official Make users provide help.
Lead- Tech and AI Automation at a healthcare company with 1-10 employees
We have escalated a few issues that we faced during some integrations, and we received reasonable responses from Make support.
Chief Executive Officer at Ashtex Solutions
They were doing the best job for my use cases and my problems.
Bubble.Io | Xano | No Code | Mba | Make | Zapier | Full Stack at Indian Railways
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
9.0
AuraQuantic is highly scalable, accommodating both easy starts and rapid growth, making it ideal for large clients and expanding needs.
Sentiment score
5.7
Make's scalability is praised for managing complex workflows and adaptability, though costs rise with increased workflow usage.
Make's scalability is great; I have automations that run on over 100 modules, and scaling is commendable with the platform's ease of use.
Lead- Tech and AI Automation at a healthcare company with 1-10 employees
Make's scalability is very good, and if the pricing were lower, I could scale a lot more.
Founder at WebEase
Whenever a new task comes to mind, I think about automating it with Make, which is good.
Business Development Consultant at Byjus
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.7
AuraQuantic is highly stable, performs excellently on Microsoft Azure, and has no reported issues, earning a ten out of ten.
Sentiment score
7.3
Make is stable and reliable, with occasional minor issues, performing well for most users 90-95% of the time.
I have noticed 5% of the time it has authentication issues and connection problems with the credentials, which are refreshed every week.
Lead- Tech and AI Automation at a healthcare company with 1-10 employees
 

Room For Improvement

AuraQuantic needs better system integration, extensive documentation, intuitive training, easier customization, and more responsive technical support.
Users request improved stability, API integration, debugging, developer features, pricing, security, educational resources, dark mode, and local deployment for Make.
There should be clarity about whether the data is secure while passing through these automations or integrations created within Make.
Chief Executive Officer at Ashtex Solutions
I would love to have more detailed logs, step-by-step error tracing, and better visualization of failed executions, as I think it would improve the user experience significantly.
software engineer at a non-tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The lagging problem needs to be solved.
Business Development Consultant at Byjus
 

Setup Cost

AuraQuantic provides scalable, transparent pricing with various plans based on deployment options, usage requirements, and number of users.
Make offers cost-effective pricing, easy setup, and affordable plans, efficiently catering to both basic and complex enterprise needs.
Licensing was affordable.
Network Engineer at AT&T
It's cost-effective and it's pocket-friendly.
Bubble.Io | Xano | No Code | Mba | Make | Zapier | Full Stack at Indian Railways
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is quite affordable for my use case.
 

Valuable Features

AuraQuantic is a user-friendly, zero-code platform for automating and optimizing processes with quick implementation and reliable support.
Make offers easy automation with robust webhooks, extensive integrations, and a user-friendly interface, enhancing efficiency and versatility.
Make has positively impacted my organization by enabling us to solve use cases for hundreds of clients across hundreds of different platforms, providing the customization capabilities to automate accounting and invoicing processes that save dozens of man-hours a month, and allowing us to build custom churn, retention, and engagement costs that have driven a 30% reduction in churn.
Network Engineer at AT&T
Instead of spending several days implementing and testing API integrations inside our FastAPI back end, I was able to build the workflows in a few hours using Make.
software engineer at a non-tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The most important aspect I feel is that it is simple to use, so even a non-technical person can easily understand what is being done.
Lead- Tech and AI Automation at a healthcare company with 1-10 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

AuraQuantic
Ranking in Process Automation
18th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (16th), Low-Code Development Platforms (21st), No-Code Development Platforms (15th), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (13th), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (21st)
Make
Ranking in Process Automation
19th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
AI Software Development (19th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of AuraQuantic is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Make is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
AuraQuantic1.0%
Make1.2%
Other97.8%
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Emilio Valle - PeerSpot reviewer
Programmer at Banco de Guatemala
Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable
It helped a lot when we started using it with more images. Before, it was basic. With images, it's more effective. Users consider it more animated and user-friendly. We can easily track a process and know exactly where a process is. It's a low-code application. The solution is very easy to use. It is stable and reliable. The solution scales well. Technical support is extremely responsive.
FA
Chief Executive Officer at Ashtex Solutions
Flexibility and efficiency accelerate business processes
Make needs to put some focus on or clarify the security aspect in its documentation or website. When creating automation through these modules between two different applications, there should be clarity about whether the data is secure while passing through these automations or integrations created within Make. The pricing of Make at this point is through operations consumption, and it becomes really expensive in certain scenarios when iterations are involved. The operation consumption is too high and sometimes becomes a burden on the client. Make needs to review its pricing strategy since they have tough competition from n8n. Make sometimes has issues with user logins and data saving when simultaneously working on two different PCs or when two developers are working on something or some blueprint. It can lose saved data from one interface to the other, and when logging on with the same user on another workstation, it occasionally misbehaves. We were unaware that Make had its own local implementation module. They need to advertise this feature more effectively as we are developing many projects in Make and working with various clients.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
9%
Government
8%
Construction Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
14%
Non Tech Company
11%
Construction Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Make?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that the cost is effective and licensing was affordable.
What needs improvement with Make?
Make could be improved by having more platforms and connections that we would like to use, as well as more flexibility in paying for operations, with tasks on a sliding scale instead of by tier.Fur...
What is your primary use case for Make?
My main use case for Make is that it serves as a perfect tool to interlace most of our API connections, syncing different environments together. Make enables us to connect apps that lack native int...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Integromat
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Nissan, RSA Chile, New Millennia Group Plc (UK), TOYOTA, ArcelorMittal Brasil, KPN, Farmacia Luis Corbi, Farmacia del Paseo, Frutas Bean, IncAE Business School, BDO Argentina, Refinery of the Pacific, Balfego Grup, Fundacion Seneca, Technological Institute Maranosa, Coprusa Group, Constructec, University of Deusto, Tenco Shopping Centers, Spanish Railways Foundation, Arbora & Ausonia.
Buan Consulting, Armadia
Find out what your peers are saying about AuraQuantic vs. Make and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.