We performed a comparison between AT&T VPN and Check Point Remote Access VPN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The stability of the solution is its most valuable feature."
"Setup using the manuals was easy."
"The team has full visibility of the users that connect allowing them to keep control of who is in the network and what data they are allowing to come in and out."
"The secure hotspot access for enabling good network connectivity is great."
"The solution is easy to install, centrally managed, and stable, with good technical support and a straightforward setup."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"It offers a simple configuration and setup."
"We have more control over the activity that users have on the internal network, thanks to the monitoring offered by Check Point and the security provided by the gateway."
"Technical support has been excellent."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"The solution had slow connections and very bad routers. We continuously had issues with the VPN and proxy configuration."
"I cannot see the full effect of the endpoint solution because it relies on having access to the DNF queries, which might not go through the Check Point firewall when you're using it for perimeter networks. Check Point will not identify the actual source of the net queries. This may be related to the architecture, however, and not poor product issues. I don't know if it can be improved on the Check Point side or not."
"The ability to allow split-tunneling while still following our corporate policy needs to be on the table."
"It would be good to have Remote Access VPN solutions for Check Point edge services."
"The Linux version may have an app (similar to Windows) instead of a shell script."
"We encounter challenges for the product’s installation and troubleshooting processes compared to other VPN products."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN handles up to a hundred megabytes for clients, but I want it to be able to handle up to one gigabyte."
"The provisioning of VPN users has room for improvement."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN's connectivity and establishment takes time and needs to be faster."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
AT&T VPN is ranked 40th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN while Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 6th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 60 reviews. AT&T VPN is rated 9.0, while Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of AT&T VPN writes "Extremely stable and very scalable ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". AT&T VPN is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Check Point Harmony Mobile, Fortinet FortiClient and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.