We performed a comparison between Aruba Access Points and Aruba Instant On Access Points based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is stable."
"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"Overall, we've been very pleased with the performance."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) is the ability to troubleshoot ports on the network. Additionally, when there is an update on the APs they are able to reboot quickly reducing downtime. Other solutions have a longer downtime when updates are done."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system."
"It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"It offers a robust warranty and exceptional performance compared to other brands."
"After we installed the Aruba switches, the work became faster because the network speed improved."
"It is a stable solution."
"Aruba Access Points is an economical solution."
"Aruba access points protect connectivity, and we don't get interference."
"Aruba products are good. The Middle Eastern marketplace is one of the biggest markets where Aruba products are preferred."
"The manageability of both on-premise and cloud versions is valuable."
"The solution's support, stability, scalability, and good redundancy features are beneficial for our network management."
"I would rate the stability of this solution a ten out of ten."
"The product is scalable. It has 20 users."
"The coverage Aruba provides across the physical area is much better. Most probably because of the new technology, the 4x4 antenna, and everything around it. It's just a much better, easier to use, and easier to manage product."
"The initial setup is very simple."
"The product is easy to set up, providing value for time since it is very quick."
"It's super user-friendly."
"The configuration is very simple."
"Its performance is very good. It suits small and medium sites very well."
"They should include SD-WAN features to it."
"Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"It would be helpful to have even stronger security features to help protect against interference from other nearby access points that aren't part of our network."
"Improvement is needed in the user-friendliness of Juniper Mist, particularly in enhancing the interaction with AI features."
"The price could be better."
"The product should include adaptive Wi-Fi to show a more accurate location."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"The delivery timeline is a major problem. There are also configuration and integration issues since not many engineers are available in the market who has expertise with the product. Some of our customers also experience network slowness."
"I have to go via HP's process, which is not as good as Aruba's used to be."
"The stability must be improved."
"The ICT dynamic is important. Every other vendor is innovating with new features and ideas. They need to compete and implement these things to stay ahead. So, I would suggest Aruba continue to gain the competitive edge."
"If the port is damaged, then Aruba Access Points don't work properly."
"The disadvantage of Aruba Access Points is experienced by me when I need it to offer me a long range of coverage."
"The product fails to provide better and extended coverage, making it in an area where improvements are required in the tool."
"The product's stability and technical support services needs improvement."
"When I first deployed the solution, I couldn't use a tagged VLAN for the management. It might already have been fixed in a recent firmware upgrade."
"It's only suitable for smaller offices. It doesn't scale well."
"I would like to see a feature that blocks, increases, or decreases bandwidth capacity for devices."
"If anything, its reporting could be improved."
"The tool is priced high."
"The solution's range could be better."
"The product's machine or equipment can cater to around 20 connections and cannot go beyond 50 simultaneous connections, because of which I think the tool's scalability is limited."
"It is scalable to a certain degree but not nearly as scalable and robust as your enterprise-grade solutions."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Aruba Instant On Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Access Points is ranked 8th in Wireless LAN with 31 reviews while Aruba Instant On Access Points is ranked 12th in Wireless LAN with 18 reviews. Aruba Access Points is rated 8.6, while Aruba Instant On Access Points is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Aruba Access Points writes "This is a reliable product that is easy to scale thanks to its virtual controller". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Aruba Instant On Access Points writes "All-inclusive pricing, great for small offices, and simple to deploy and manage". Aruba Access Points is most compared with FortiAP, whereas Aruba Instant On Access Points is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Aruba Instant, Cambium Networks Wireless LAN, Omada Access Points and Fortinet FortiWLM. See our Aruba Access Points vs. Aruba Instant On Access Points report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
