Aruba Instant On Access Points vs Omada Access Points comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and TP-Link are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.6, while TP-Link is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.9. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 1.0% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to TP-Link’s 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TP-Link users who would recommend it.

Aruba Instant On Access Points

Read 32 Aruba Instant On Access Points reviews

1,720 Views
903 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Omada Access Points

Read 15 Omada Access Points reviews

4,024 Views
3,202 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Aruba Instant On Access Points

Omada Access Points

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Omada Access Points and Aruba Instant On Access Points compete in providing high-quality Wi-Fi connectivity solutions for businesses. Omada Access Points have an advantage with competitive pricing and strong support, while Aruba Instant On Access Points are seen as premium products with superior features and reliability, justifying their higher cost for many buyers.

Features: Omada Access Points offer affordable central management, seamless Wi-Fi roaming, and scalability, supporting up to hundreds of devices. Aruba Instant On Access Points focus on high-speed performance, WPA3 security features, and mobile network management, appealing to tech-savvy environments.

Room for Improvement: Omada Access Points could enhance customer service efficiency and include more high-performance features and security protocols. Aruba Instant On Access Points might reduce upfront costs, expand advanced features, and improve scalability options for larger deployments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Omada Access Points offer straightforward deployment with cloud-based tools, ideal for budget-conscious businesses, though some customer service areas need improvement. Aruba Instant On Access Points provide a user-friendly deployment process with mobile apps for intuitive network management, supported by consistent customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Omada Access Points are more affordable, with lower setup costs, delivering considerable ROI for budget-limited settings like startups. Aruba Instant On Access Points have higher upfront costs but promise a solid ROI with their robust technology infrastructure, appealing to businesses needing high-performance and secure networks.

To learn more, read our detailed Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Omada Access Points Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Omada Access Points

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aruba Instant On Access Points

Ranking in Wireless LAN

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Omada Access Points

Ranking in Wireless LAN

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Aruba Instant On Access Points is 1.0%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Omada Access Points is 4.0%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

Ricardo Quintero

Infrastructure/Telcom Coordinator at Schnellecke Group AG & Co. KG

Affordable and offers an easy setup phase

I was working on the on-premises solutions, like IronNet, Aironet, and some other tools from Cisco, but not with Meraki. The last Aironet model that we have here in Mexico, in the corporate office, and in some of the other regions of Mexico is Cisco Aironet 3700 and Cisco Aironet 3800, so it is just two or three devices. Aruba Instant On Access Points was working with Aruba 2540 and Cisco 3850 In Cisco, I found some issues. I was working well with a vendor. I was working with Cisco Catalyst 9200 and Cisco Catalyst 9300, along with Cisco Catalyst 2916M XL Switch. With all devices, we got a report. During the immigration, we choose another vendor, which Aruba. We have some issues with Aruba Instant On Access Points in iOS that are targeting the devices, and I have seen some problems with the DHCP solution.

Read full review

Prasad Wijesooriya

IT Manager at Hala Equipment Trading LLC

Well-suited for mobile and portable device usage but issues with stability

The problem is that when the number of users increases, TP-Link automatically drops the speed, and in terms of coverage, it falls short. We are not using any industrial-level equipment or accuracy. We are looking for something at the industrial level, advanced Access Points, not the basic ones from TP-Link. Omada Access Points could be improved in terms of connectivity and speed. That is the main thing. The other thing is security. Currently, most people are sharing their passwords, allowing unauthorized users to access Wi-Fi networks. So, the main areas for improvement are security, accessibility, and speed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When an error or alert happens, I receive it in the application. I do not have to be there to know if something is wrong."

"The virtual Controller feature is valuable."

"Aruba is much better than other vendors like Cisco and NETGEAR in terms of quality, price, and value for money."

"The mobile app is good. We have many things that are connected through mobile. Most users use mobile to connect to the Wi-Fi."

"The app and the provisioning are the best features of the product. It was really impressive that I was able to just provision it remotely. I didn't have to be on-site with my friend, and we were just able to get everything up and operational. So, the app is great. It sends me notifications when things are down, and it tells me how everything is doing."

"The product's initial setup phase is too easy."

"Its technical support is excellent."

"I would recommend Aruba Instant On Access Points to others."

More Aruba Instant On Access Points pros

"The initial setup is not complicated."

"Omada is a good solution that I would recommend, and it is less expensive while providing good results."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its price."

"We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisfied with Omada's performance as an engineer."

"The solution has been dependable and has kept up with modern technology."

"When this solution is set up, it is solid. It offers fast deployment."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easy to deploy and reliable."

"This product is easy to use."

More Omada Access Points pros

Cons

"In future updates, more AI for intelligence and the option for a separate network could be beneficial."

"The limited functionality of the mobile app restricts its use primarily to small and medium-sized setups, making it less suitable for enterprise-level solutions."

"The Unifi Controller is slower compared to other options like Aruba."

"If anything, its reporting could be improved."

"The solution should include higher speed and lesser cost."

"The security aspect needs improvement."

"It's only suitable for smaller offices. It doesn't scale well."

"When I first deployed the solution, I couldn't use a tagged VLAN for the management. It might already have been fixed in a recent firmware upgrade."

More Aruba Instant On Access Points cons

"The price of the solution is an area requiring improvement since I want the solution to be made available at a cheaper price than its current market price."

"It is less affordable for smaller businesses."

"Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover."

"It's better for smaller organizations. This would not work for enterprises. It is not very scalable."

"Omada's ordering platform could be improved, though. Some of their distributors are a pain to work with."

"We have some issues with stability. It is not so fast. That is the main problem."

"There should be more remote support for the mobile application."

"Aruba has better scaling capabilities."

More Omada Access Points cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Aruba Instant On Access Points are license-free. It's a very good and cheap solution for wireless networks. It can be compared with solutions from Ubiquiti and TP-Link, but it is in a different class. Aruba Instant On Access Points are cheaper than those from Cisco, Ruckus, and Motorola. It's perhaps the cheapest one. They do not use licenses, so it is a solution from the box. You don't need to pay extra money or deal with hidden payments."

"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"You buy it for $165 an AP, which is what we paid."

"The product's price falls on the cheaper end of the spectrum. The price of the product is one of the biggest benefits that it offers."

"It needs a license."

"The price of Aruba Instant On Access Points is reasonable. They are competitively priced. I've even used it in my home at one time because of the low price."

"Its price is fair. It is not really cheap, and it is also not expensive. It is in the middle."

"There is a need to make yearly payments towards the standard licensing charges associated with the product. There are some additional costs associated with the product since I have seen customers who purchase three-year or five-year plans."

More Aruba Instant On Access Points pricing and cost advice

"The price is affordable, and we haven't had any additional costs due to having a limited number of users."

"On a scale of one to ten for pricing, with one being cheap and ten being expensive, I would rate Omada Access Points at a one for its cost-effectiveness."

"The cost of Omada is much better than Aruba and Cisco, and it does what we need it to do in most cases. Around 10 percent of our clients need a more carrier-grade solution for mobile platforms."

"The cost is about 500 Brazilian real per access point, with no additional recurring costs."

"We don't have to pay for the license because the solution has no subscription cost."

"There is no need to pay for the licensing costs since my company is in South Africa. Omada Access Points can be termed as a medium-priced product."

"Its benefit is that it is cost effective."

"The price of the solution is not a lot for five people to use it."

More Omada Access Points pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

44%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Government

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Aruba Instant On Access Points?

It's really easy to set up. And, you don't have to pay for the cloud solution. That's really interesting for our clients. And the other thing is, the roaming is also quite good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aruba Instant On Access Points?

The cost of Aruba Instant On Access Points is reasonable; however, I do not have information on the exact pricing, such as cost per user or annual license fees.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Aruba Instant On Access Points?

We can improve Aruba Instant On Access Points by tuning some of the parameters of the radio. The default configuration can be overridden to enhance performance beyond the default settings.

See all answers

What do you like most about TP-Link Auranet EAP?

We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisf...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Omada Access Points?

Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover. I am looking for an access point that can cover long distances.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Omada Access Points?

I am trying to design a wireless network with Omada equipment. I have deployed Omada in office areas, and now I want to deploy it in a hotel. The company size where I usually deploy is medium-sized...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiAP vs Aruba Instant On Access Points

Compared 15% of the time

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs Aruba Instant On Access Points

Compared 12% of the time

Aruba Instant vs Aruba Instant On Access Points

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Aruba Instant On Access Points

Compared 11% of the time

Huawei Wireless vs Aruba Instant On Access Points

Compared 8% of the time

More Aruba Instant On Access Points Competitors

Aruba Instant vs Omada Access Points

Compared 19% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 18% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 10% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 9% of the time

SonicWall Wireless Network Manager vs Omada Access Points

Compared 2% of the time

More Omada Access Points Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Instant On Access Points

June 2025

Download Aruba Instant On Access Points product report

Buyer's Guide

Omada Access Points

May 2025

Download Omada Access Points product report

Also Known As

No data available

TP-Link Auranet EAP, TP-Link EAP, Auranet EAP, Auranet

Overview

Ingredients for success.

Fast 802.11ac Wave 2, secure employee and guest access, easy-to-use web, and mobile app management.

Say yes to secure Wi-Fi access.

Pre-built access control lists (ACLs) and built-in firewall in the access points prevent malicious traffic from entering your network – we call it “hassle-free” security.

Never drop an important call.

With Instant On, voice and video business applications are automatically prioritized, so you stay connected with your peers.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Omada access points provide a business-class wireless network solution that’s flexible, manageable, secure, and easy-to-deploy. The free EAP Controller software allows users to manage hundreds of EAPs at multiple sites, all from a single location. The ability to control, adjust and visualize the entire network from any connected PC makes centralized business Wi-Fi management more efficient than ever before. Omada EAPs also feature captive portal and advanced RF management functions, which make them ideal for demanding, high-traffic environments such as campuses, hotels, malls and offices.

TP-Link

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Reflections Resort,Sim Lim Square, Hotel Mary Colombia, Peru WISP, Chase Grammer School

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Omada Access Points

June 2025

Free Report: Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Omada Access Points

Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Omada Access Points and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Aruba Instant On Access Points vs. Omada Access Points report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.