We performed a comparison between Armis and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."Armis is a straightforward and user-friendly solution."
"It's a recommended tool for penetration testers because it's effective for that purpose."
"The solution creates vulnerability tickets within the VM profile but should also include them under the Remediation tab so the fixes can be viewed in the ticketing queue."
"It is pretty stable. I would rate it nine or maybe ten."
"The most valuable feature for me is container scanning because I am interested in CICD security."
"It is very stable, and it is updated periodically by adding new vulnerabilities."
"Tenable.io, in particular, is quite a powerful product. It looks at your traditional environment, which is pretty much anything that is on-premises, and it also goes a step ahead and covers your modern assets, which is anything that is currently sitting in the cloud. You get complete visibility of your entire environment and tech operation. The ability to give you visibility across the entire tech surface is one of the biggest advantages that Tenable.io has."
"It helps us create remediation projects and assign the console’s responsibility to specific engineers."
"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Armis doesn't have a back intel feature."
"The UI has room for improvement."
"It would be helpful if Tenable could be more clear with regard to everything the solution can and cannot do with the particular license that you have."
"The only drawback of the solution is that it is expensive."
"I don't recommend Tenable.io Vulnerability Management for web scanning"
"More flexibility is required compared to other solutions."
"The pricing of the solution could be more reasonable."
"The shortcoming of the solution that needs improvement is related to its capability to do vulnerability assessments on applications."
"The tool's reports are bad. They're not very customizable or flexible. During audits, we often have to exclude things that aren't relevant to our organization, but we can't do that easily with the reports. They come in HTML or PDF format, and we can't compare current results with previous ones in Excel because we never receive reports in Excel."
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Armis is ranked 12th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 1 review while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 38 reviews. Armis is rated 8.0, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Armis writes "A straightforward and user-friendly solution that can be used for asset intelligence". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". Armis is most compared with Nozomi Networks, Forescout Platform, Axonius, Claroty Platform and Phosphorus Cybersecurity, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Wiz.
See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
