Armis vs Checkmarx One comparison

Armis and Checkmarx are both solutions in the Risk-Based Vulnerability Management category. Armis is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.6, while Checkmarx is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.3. Additionally, 90% of Armis users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Checkmarx users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

Checkmarx One and Armis are competing products in the cybersecurity category, with Checkmarx One having the upper hand in pricing and support satisfaction, while Armis leads in feature offerings, which justifies its cost.

Features: Checkmarx One offers comprehensive vulnerability detection, DevOps tool integration, and static application security testing without the need for code compilation. Armis excels with real-time device monitoring, robust IoT security, and extensive asset visibility for unmanaged devices.

Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One could enhance real-time monitoring capabilities and IoT security features while expanding asset visibility. Armis users might benefit from improvements in price flexibility, workflow integration, and additional support for more diverse application scanning.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One integrates seamlessly with existing workflows, providing responsive customer support that aids quick implementation. Armis, despite a straightforward deployment process and proactive support, often necessitates more initial configuration to leverage its functionalities fully.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One is noted for its competitive pricing that aligns with swift ROI due to effective vulnerability management. Armis, while having a higher setup cost, promises great ROI, fueled by its ability to secure IoT and unmanaged devices extensively.

To learn more, read our detailed Armis vs. Checkmarx One Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Armis vs. Checkmarx One

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,202 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Zafran Security

Featured Reviews

Israel Cavazos Landini

Associate Director IT Security Operations at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

Weekly insights and risk analysis facilitate informed security decisions

I appreciate the weekly insights Zafran provides, which include critical topics for networks and IT security, allowing us to evaluate which insights apply to our environment. The organization score feature is valuable to keep the leadership team updated on how our infrastructure fares security-wise. The applicable risk level versus base risk level feature is beneficial because prior to Zafran, we only used the base risk level, but now understand that risk depends on the asset itself. Zafran is an excellent tool.

Read full review

SaketShrivastava

Technology and Digitization Lead at JLL

Comprehensive asset visibility and OT operations support enhance risk mitigation

I use Armis for asset discovery and vulnerability assessments of the OT network Armis is easy to use. Very few software solutions have OT capabilities that do not impact OT operations. Its asset visibility is good as well. This comprehensive feature set is crucial for our operations.…

Read full review

Syed Hasan

Specialist Leader at Deloitte

Partner experiences excellent technical support and seamless initial setup

In my opinion, if we are able to extract or show the report, and because everything is going towards agent tech and GenAI, it would be beneficial if it could get integrated with our code base and do the fix automatically. It could suggest how the code base is written and automatically populate the source code with three different solution options to choose from. This would be really helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Zafran has become an indispensable tool in our cybersecurity arsenal."

"We saw benefits from Zafran Security almost immediately after deploying it."

"We are able to see the real risk of a vulnerability on our environment with our security tools."

"Overall, we have seen about eighty-seven percent reduction of the number of vulnerabilities that require urgency to remediate, specifically the number of criticals."

"Zafran is an excellent tool."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is asset tracking."

"It determines which assets and devices are at risk, alerts you if there's a risk, and categorizes all assets, including personal computers, mobile phones, servers, televisions, cars, and video game consoles."

"Armis is very easy to implement due to its agentless design and offers a granular level of visibility for all assets in the network."

"The solution’s vulnerability monitoring system is very good."

"Armis is easy to use."

"The tool is user-friendly and helps to detect vulnerabilities."

"The initial setup and deployment were simple."

More Armis pros

"The best thing about Checkmarx is the amount of vulnerabilities that it can find compared to other free tools."

"It gives the proper code flow of vulnerabilities and the number of occurrences."

"I have seen a return on investment from Checkmarx One."

"It is a stable product."

"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the Best Fix Location and the Payments option because you can save a lot of time trying to mitigate the configuration. Using these tools can save you a lot of time."

"We were using HPE Security Fortify to scan code for security vulnerabilities, but it can scan only after a successful compile. If the code has dependencies or build errors, the scan fails. With Checkmarx, pre-compile scanning is seamless. This allows us to scan more code."

"The setup is very easy. There is a lot of information in the documents which makes the install not difficult at all."

"The main thing we find valuable about Checkmarx is the ease of use. It's easy to initiate scans and triage defects."

More Checkmarx One pros

Cons

"The dashboarding and reporting functionality of Zafran Security is an area that definitely could use some improvements."

"I think the ability to have some enhanced reporting capabilities is something they can improve on, as they have good reports but we have asked for some specific reporting enhancements."

"Initially, we were somewhat concerned about the scalability of Zafran due to our large asset count and the substantial amount of information we needed to process."

"We have faced issues with the tool's stability."

"We face issues during implementation."

"Like any IT tool, continuous learning and improvement are essential for the solution."

"The vulnerability assessment for Windows is not that great. It misses out on a lot of vulnerabilities."

"The solution's vulnerability testing could be improved."

"We face difficulties in integrating the product with ticketing tools like ServiceNow."

"Armis could improve its geographic spread and marketing campaigns across regions."

"There isn't anything specific that needs improvement."

More Armis cons

"The lack of ability to review compiled source code. It would then be able to compete with other scanning tools, such as Veracode."

"We would like to be able to run scans from our local system, rather than having to always connect to the product server, which is a longer process."

"The product can be improved by continuing to expand the application languages and frameworks that can be scanned for vulnerabilities. This includes expanded coverage for mobile applications as well as open-source development tools."

"Checkmarx could improve by reducing the price."

"The integration could improve by including, for example, DevSecOps."

"We are trying to find out if there is a way to identify the run-time null values. I am analyzing different tools to check if there is any tool that supports run-time null value identification, but I don't think any of the tools in the market currently supports this feature. It would be helpful if Checkmarx can identify and throw an exception for a null value at the run time. It would make things a lot easier if there is a way for Checkmarx to identify nullable fields or hard-coded values in the code. The accessibility for customized Checkmarx rules is currently limited and should be improved. In addition, it would be great if Checkmarx can do static code and dynamic code validation. It does a lot of security-related scanning, and it should also do static code and dynamic code validation. Currently, for security-related validation, we are using Checkmarx, and for static code and dynamic code validation, we are using some other tools. We are spending money on different tools. We can pay a little extra money and use Checkmarx for everything."

"I can't create a business case with multiple-factor authentication."

"Meta data is always needed."

More Checkmarx One cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The tool is cheap."

"The solution's price is high and you pay based on the number of users."

"It's relatively expensive."

"We got a special offer for a 30% reduction for three years, after our first year. I think for a real source-code scanning tool, you have to add a lot of money for Open Source Analysis, and AppSec Coach (160 Euro per user per year)."

"The price of Checkmarx could be reduced to match their competitors, it is expensive."

"The average deal size was usually anywhere between $120K to $175K on an annual basis, which could be divided across 12 months."

"Be cautious of the one-year subscription date. Once it expires, your price will go up."

"It is an expensive solution."

"The tool's pricing is fine."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	38

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zafran Security?

Since we stood Zafran Security up in our private cloud, we handle the maintenance on our side. As we opted not to use...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zafran Security?

In terms of areas for improvement, Zafran Security is doing a really great job as a new and emerging company. Oftenti...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zafran Security?

My use cases for Zafran Security revolve around two primary areas. One is around vulnerability management and priorit...

See all answers

What do you like most about Armis?

Armis is a straightforward and user-friendly solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Armis?

The vulnerability assessment for Windows is not that great. It misses out on a lot of vulnerabilities. Additionally, ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Armis?

I use Armis ( /products/armis-reviews ) for asset discovery and vulnerability assessments of the OT network.

See all answers

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz Code vs Zafran Security

Compared 34% of the time

Vulcan Cyber vs Zafran Security

Compared 14% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Zafran Security

Compared 8% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Zafran Security

Compared 7% of the time

Seemplicity vs Zafran Security

Compared 4% of the time

More Zafran Security Competitors

Axonius vs Armis

Compared 24% of the time

Nozomi Networks vs Armis

Compared 16% of the time

Claroty Platform vs Armis

Compared 16% of the time

runZero vs Armis

Compared 6% of the time

More Armis Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Compared 44% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 7% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Zafran Security

September 2025

Download Zafran Security product report

Buyer's Guide

IoT Security

October 2025

Download Armis product report

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

October 2025

Download Checkmarx One product report

Overview

Zafran Security integrates with existing security tools to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities effectively, proving that most critical vulnerabilities are not exploitable, optimizing threat management.

Zafran Security introduces an innovative operating model for managing security threats and vulnerabilities. By leveraging the threat exposure management platform, it pinpoints and prioritizes exploitable vulnerabilities, reducing risk through immediate remediation. This platform enhances your hybrid cloud security by normalizing vulnerability signals and integrating specific IT context data, such as CVE runtime presence and internet asset reachability, into its analysis. No longer reliant on patch windows, Zafran Security allows you to manage risks actively.

What are the key features of Zafran Security?

Threat Exposure Management: Utilizes existing tools to prioritize vulnerabilities and manage threats.
Integrative Analysis: Combines security data with IT context for precise vulnerability management.
Real-time Risk Reduction: Enables immediate risk management without waiting for patches.
Hybrid Cloud Compatibility: Functions across diverse cloud environments for comprehensive security.

What benefits can users expect from Zafran Security?

Improved Security: Enhances protection by efficiently identifying and mitigating risks.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces unnecessary patching expenses by confirming non-exploitable vulnerabilities.
Time Savings: Frees developers to focus on root causes by handling immediate threats.
Comprehensive Insight: Offers a holistic view of security threats and vulnerabilities.

In industries where security is paramount, such as finance and healthcare, Zafran Security provides invaluable protection by ensuring that only exploitable vulnerabilities are addressed. It allows entities to maintain robust security measures while allocating resources efficiently, fitting seamlessly into existing security strategies.

Zafran Security

Armis is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution used for continuous monitoring and threat detection across IT and IoT devices. It excels in spotting vulnerabilities, managing device compliance, and tracking assets to enhance security protocols and network management. Key features include real-time threat detection, comprehensive visibility, and granular risk assessments. Armis boosts organizational productivity by streamlining workflows and enhancing operational accuracy.

Armis

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Samsung Research America, IDT Corporation, Gett

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Buyer's Guide

Armis vs. Checkmarx One

September 2025

Free Report: Armis vs. Checkmarx One

Find out what your peers are saying about Armis vs. Checkmarx One and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Armis vs. Checkmarx One report.

See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.