Ardoq vs IDERA ER/Studio comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ardoq Logo
1,198 views|937 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
IDERA Logo
2,001 views|1,414 comparisons
86% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ardoq and IDERA ER/Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Architecture Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Ardoq vs. IDERA ER/Studio Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Snapshots are the most valuable feature.""It is a stable solution."

More Ardoq Pros →

"Valuable features include the ability to visually represent what the database tables are going to look like and their relationships. Also, the ability to document the definitions of the tables and the columns that are in a table so that we can communicate what the data is and how it should be used.""The most important features are logical and physical models that we can compare and develop. Also, the Data Dictionary can be created out of your studio. Finally, database schemas help understand the logic that's behind the scene, behind the SQL tables. Especially when there are a lot of them, the schemas help everyone understand the business processes.""We are able to document the data lineage and data flows of our data from one system to another.""The most valuable features are... those that enable me to represent the database to the development community and the business users.""We have a database design group of about 15 people. The Repository enables multiple people to work on the same model at the same time. We have fully integrated models, so we have one model for the enterprise data warehouse, one model for MDM, with a lot of sub-models in these things. People work on different parts of the model at different times. So the repository enables us to share the models, and keep track of what everybody is working on.""The data modeling module is important to me because I am a database developer and designer... It's very fast, reliable, up-to-date, so easy to use, smooth.""It's easy to model and has a user-friendly interface. I like the team portal because, once we upload, the entire team can see the model.""It does the job."

More IDERA ER/Studio Pros →

Cons
"Scalability as a standalone system is good, given the information that has been described inside Ardoq. But not the scalability as a third-party system or with integration with other systems. Because in this direction, the scalability is about zero for Ardoq.""The training environment wasn't very intuitive, but maybe with more use, it will get better."

More Ardoq Cons →

"I would like to upload, a database with about 3,000 tables. It takes so much time and, finally, it freezes the whole solution so that I actually cannot work with that environment. For the data warehouse, it's fine because I have 20 or 30 tables. It works fine. But, when I reverse-engineer the database with 3,000 tables, it freezes and it's hard to upload and reverse-engineer such environments in ER/Studio.""when there are some links to the external databases, if this database is not structured it is not uploaded. It gives me errors and I cannot see the view that was created on this structure and I cannot change those views, even manually. It skips the views. I have to ignore those views. I cannot re-upload them because it gives me an error.""This solution needs more precise documentation.""It would be helpful if they could create a generic JSON database type, as a target database, rather than a specific one like Mongo.""The model diagram because very clumsy when you save it on the team server and the models are very big.""Sometimes our version is a little unstable. But I think this problem occurs because our version is old.""What needs the most improvement are semantic lineage and usability.""They allow functionalities to be released before the full tests for catching and correcting errors are completed."

More IDERA ER/Studio Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We pay for extended support."
  • More Ardoq Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The product is pricey."
  • "The process of licensing could be much simpler, from our experience."
  • "I'm a firm believer that all software is overpriced these days but, comparatively speaking, I think ER/Studio is worth the money."
  • "I feel the product's pricing is a good value."
  • "Pricing is on point, but do your due diligence - not every developer needs the tool."
  • "As an individual user, the renewal is a little costly."
  • "Pricing is expensive and on the higher-end."
  • "At my previous company using ER/Studio, a database compare took four hours before using the product and 15 minutes after using the product."
  • More IDERA ER/Studio Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Hi @Cheryl Joseph ​Looking at the crossover between Project and Portfolio management with EA, then Planview could be a good choice. If looking at Portfolio Management from an EA perspective then… more »
    Top Answer:Here is a comparison of Ardoq and Sparx Systems, two popular Enterprise Architecture Management (EAM) tools Ardoq Pros: o Ardoq has a user-friendly interface that makes it easy to create and… more »
    Top Answer:It isn't easy to compare the thousands of tables in the model against the database. The tool should improve the synchronization within the large organization
    Ranking
    Views
    1,198
    Comparisons
    937
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    448
    Rating
    7.5
    Views
    2,001
    Comparisons
    1,414
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    440
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IDERA ER Studio, ER/Studio, ER/Studio Enterprise Team Edition
    Learn More
    Overview

    A Dynamic and Data-Driven Approach to Enterprise Architecture
    Engage and connect stakeholders across the organization with business-friendly visualizations understandable to all.

    IDERA ER/Studio is a powerful suite for business-driven data modeling that enables companies to create an enterprise architecture foundation for data governance. With round-trip support for multiple database platforms, data architects have the power to reverse-engineer, analyze, and optimize existing databases easily from diverse platforms. Data professionals can easily capture and share models, metadata, data sources, and glossaries across the organization for improved alignment between the organization and Information Technology. Organizational stakeholders can take part in the metadata definition workflow and access information on models and metadata at the right level for their needs.

    Unlike its competition, it provides the broadest range of data platform support, industry-leading enterprise-level capabilities, visual data lineage and flow modeling, full dimensional modeling for data warehousing and business intelligence, and business data objects to bridge the gap between developers and data architects. It also provides a complete solution for enterprise architecture and data governance, extensive model change management, unique incorporation of true enterprise data dictionaries, unique linking of constructs across models, integrated visual data lineage import, and integrated data and business process modeling.

    Sample Customers
    Schibsted, Government of Malmo, Torvald
    Newmont Mining, Entrust, Accolade, TalkTalk, Catalina, Protective Life, NTT Data, dir systèmes, Microsoft; American Express, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Coriant, Fedex, GlaxoSmithKline, PepsiCo, Prudential, Wells Fargo
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government8%
    Retailer6%
    REVIEWERS
    Government19%
    Healthcare Company14%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Computer Software Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise66%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise76%
    Buyer's Guide
    Ardoq vs. IDERA ER/Studio
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Ardoq vs. IDERA ER/Studio and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Ardoq is ranked 12th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 2 reviews while IDERA ER/Studio is ranked 10th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 33 reviews. Ardoq is rated 7.6, while IDERA ER/Studio is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Ardoq writes "Provides stable performance and scalability but not intuitive for data modeling". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IDERA ER/Studio writes "The solution has important reverse engineering features, but it needs a single sign-on feature". Ardoq is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, LeanIX, BiZZdesign HoriZZon, MEGA HOPEX and ADOIT, whereas IDERA ER/Studio is most compared with erwin Data Modeler by Quest, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, SAP PowerDesigner, Toad Data Modeler and erwin Evolve by Quest. See our Ardoq vs. IDERA ER/Studio report.

    See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.