We performed a comparison between ADOIT and Ardoq based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management."It helps me to model the architecture at an enterprise level."
"We need to understand how the data could be segregated."
"Scalability as a standalone system is good, given the information that has been described inside Ardoq. But not the scalability as a third-party system or with integration with other systems. Because in this direction, the scalability is about zero for Ardoq."
"The training environment wasn't very intuitive, but maybe with more use, it will get better."
Earn 20 points
ADOIT is ranked 21st in Enterprise Architecture Management while Ardoq is ranked 12th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 2 reviews. ADOIT is rated 8.0, while Ardoq is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ADOIT writes "A good tool that's great for modelling and building heat maps ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ardoq writes "Provides stable performance and scalability but not intuitive for data modeling". ADOIT is most compared with LeanIX, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, MEGA HOPEX and BiZZdesign HoriZZon, whereas Ardoq is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, LeanIX, BiZZdesign HoriZZon, MEGA HOPEX and erwin Data Modeler by Quest.
See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
