Apiiro vs GitLab comparison

Apiiro and GitLab are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Apiiro is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.5, while GitLab is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.6. Apiiro holds a 0.7% mindshare in SAST, compared to GitLab’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Apiiro users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of GitLab users who would recommend it.

Apiiro

Read 3 Apiiro reviews

1,483 Views
1,053 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitLab

Read 85 GitLab reviews

20,902 Views
3,135 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Apiiro

GitLab

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

GitLab and Apiiro are key players in the software development and security management markets. GitLab appears to have an edge in terms of affordability and integration, whereas Apiiro stands out for sophisticated risk management capabilities.

Features: GitLab provides valuable features for seamless integration, collaboration, and a comprehensive support system. It is recognized for offering a wide array of tools that streamline development workflows. Apiiro, on the other hand, specializes in advanced risk assessment, risk analysis capabilities, and features tailored for security-focused organizations. Both products deliver excellent functionality, but Apiiro's focus on security provides a specific advantage for risk-conscious users.

Room for Improvement: GitLab users have expressed the need for enhanced performance speed, better integration with third-party tools, and more user-friendly configuration options. Apiiro customers seek more intuitive configuration processes, clearer documentation, and simpler setups. Addressing these areas can broaden their usability and effectiveness for different organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitLab's deployment is generally straightforward, with users appreciating its reliable customer support. Its user-friendly nature is well-suited for teams with limited deployment experience. Apiiro, while somewhat more complex to deploy, benefits from dedicated support teams that enhance issue resolution. These teams are knowledgeable and facilitate a smoother deployment experience, despite its in-depth customization needs.

Pricing and ROI: GitLab is considered cost-effective, offering satisfactory ROI and manageable setup costs. Apiiro involves higher initial costs but is justified through its robust risk mitigation features, providing significant returns. The premium pricing of Apiiro is balanced by its offering of superior security enhancements, making it attractive to tech buyers focusing on security.

To learn more, read our detailed Apiiro vs. GitLab Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apiiro vs. GitLab

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 864,155 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apiiro

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

18th

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Security (11th), Software Supply Chain Security (8th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (12th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (4th)

GitLab

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

7th

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (10th), Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Rapid Application Development Software (11th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Apiiro is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitLab is 2.4%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Kunal M

Capability Center Leader, ETRM Platforms at Shell

Comprehensive risk analysis helps identify key performance trends but report access needs improvement

My first feedback for Apiiro is that it is very slow, extremely slow. The moment I select from the entire list of repositories in my vertical, which is almost more than 400 repositories, it takes a lot of time for me to load the report. Sometimes it fails. I do not have Role-Based Access Control (RBAC). It's only given to the application security team, and Apiiro as a vendor does not have the rollback access control enabled for the clients, so that would have given me access to the reports tab, which would have made my life easier. Currently, I have to go to the risks tab to pull out all this information. I started exploring dashboards with Copilot. I need to reach out to the Apiiro teams to see if I can get an access token so that I can pull out a Power BI dashboard. I think Apiiro definitely has its own capabilities, but if there are access tokens that teams can use to build a custom dashboard, that would be great. This might already exist, but that is something which will ease the vulnerability management day-to-day activities.

Read full review

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements

The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab ( /products/gitlab-reviews ) are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Apiiro's secrets detection feature has saved us several times, which we appreciate greatly."

"The workflow automation is likely the best aspect of the solution."

"The solution has an established roadmap that lays out its plans for upgrades over the next two to three years."

"The important feature is the entire process of versioning source code maintenance and easy deployment. It is a necessity for the CI/CD pipeline."

"GitLab is very useful for pipelines, continuous integration, and continuous deployment. It is also stable."

"Git hosting has an integration with ACD which is why we liked this solution in the first place."

"For us, Gitlab's most valuable feature is the integration with Cypress. We're using Cypress as an automation tool, so we're using GitLab as a tool for running in parallel."

"GitLab's best feature is Actions."

"They incorporate new features every September, and they have introduced their own code editor and AI features."

"GitLab is kind of an image of GitHub, so it gives us the flexibility to monitor our changes in the repos."

More GitLab pros

Cons

"I would like support for our self-hosted Git server, other than GitHub, just regular Git."

"User management is a little bit clunky."

"It should be used by a larger number of people. They should raise awareness."

"The solution should again offer an on-premises deployment option."

"The only thing our company is really waiting on in terms of features is the development of metrics."

"The solution does not have many built-in functions or variables so scripting is required."

"Technologies are always changing. Nowadays, new things like serverless computing and workload management have emerged. We have noticed a few gap items for faster service delivery. For example, we do user interface testing in the latest team and automate it using some tools. Recently, we integrated a tool with user interface testing, which can simulate a multi-user environment. So, we would like to see more integration with different platforms."

"There is a need to improve or adopt AI into the ecosystem like a co-pilot, which Microsoft has done with GitHub."

"It is a little complex to set up the pipelines within the solution."

"GitLab can improve the integration with third-party applications. It could be made easier. Additionally, having API control from my application could be helpful."

More GitLab cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We are using the free version of GitLab."

"This is an open-source solution."

"It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."

"The solution is based on a licensing model that includes technical support and is paid annually."

"The initial setup cost is excellent and you can add the premium features later."

"The solution's pricing is acceptable."

"The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."

"GitLab is an open-source solution."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,155 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apiiro?

Apiiro's secrets detection feature has saved us several times, which we appreciate greatly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apiiro?

My understanding is the pricing is pretty competitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apiiro?

See all answers

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The pricing and cost are on par with other tools and are neither too expensive nor cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

Regarding improvements, making task management is something that GitLab can potentially make easier, similar to what DevOps or Jira does.

See all answers

Comparisons

Snyk vs Apiiro

Compared 27% of the time

Cycode vs Apiiro

Compared 21% of the time

Ox Security vs Apiiro

Compared 15% of the time

Legit Security vs Apiiro

Compared 11% of the time

Wiz Code vs Apiiro

Compared 10% of the time

More Apiiro Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 29% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 15% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

TeamCity vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apiiro

July 2025

Download Apiiro product report

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

July 2025

Download GitLab product report

Also Known As

Apiiro Control Plane (ASOC), Apiiro API Security (SAST), Apiiro Open Source (SCA)

Fuzzit

Overview

Apiiro is the leader in application security posture management (ASPM), unifying risk visibility, prioritization, and remediation with deep code analysis and runtime context.

Companies like Morgan Stanley, SoFi, Rakuten, and Navan leverage Apiiro's ASPM to...

Get complete application and risk visibility: Apiiro takes a deep, code-based approach to ASPM. Its Cloud Application Security Platform analyzes source code and pulls in runtime context to build a continuous, graph-based inventory of application and software supply chain components.

Prioritize risks with code-to-runtime context: With its proprietary Risk Graph™️, Apiiro contextualizes security alerts from third-party tools and native security solutions based on the likelihood and impact of risk to uniquely minimize alert backlogs and triage time by 95%.

Fix and prevent risks that matter—faster: By tying risks to code owners, providing LLM-enriched remediation guidance, and embedding risk-based guardrails directly into developer tools and workflows, Apiiro improves remediation times (MTTR) by up to 85%.

Apiiro's native security solutions include API security testing in code, secrets detection and validation, software bill of materials (SBOM) generation, sensitive data exposure prevention, software composition analysis (SCA), and CI/CD and SCM security.

Apiiro

GitLab offers a secure and user-friendly platform for CI/CD pipeline management, code repository control, and collaboration, enhancing development speed and efficiency. It facilitates automation with extensive customization and tool integration, ideal for DevOps processes.

GitLab supports source code management, version control, and collaborative development. It's frequently used in CI/CD processes to automate builds and deployments while integrating DevOps practices. GitLab allows companies to manage repositories, automate pipelines, conduct code reviews, and maintain development lifecycles. The platform supports infrastructure and configuration management, enabling efficient code collaboration, deployment automation, and comprehensive repository handling. Many organizations commit and deploy developed code using GitLab's capabilities.

What are GitLab's most valuable features?

CI/CD Pipeline Management: Streamlines development through automated testing and deployment.
User-Friendly Interface: Ensures ease of collaboration and task automation.
Code Merging and Branching: Facilitates smooth code integration and version control.
Security Platform: Provides strong security features for safe development.
Tool Integration: Enhances functionality with diverse tool integration.

What benefits should users evaluate?

Development Speed: Accelerates processes through automation.
Collaboration Ease: Simplifies team interactions and workflow.
Customization Options: Offers extensive personalization for specific needs.
Comprehensive Documentation: Provides detailed guidance for users.
Secure Platform: Maintains integrity with robust security features.

In specific industries, GitLab serves as a backbone for source code management and CI/CD implementation. Companies leverage its capabilities for infrastructure management and deployment automation, thus streamlining project delivery timelines. Its ability to handle configuration management and code repositories effectively aids in maintaining development lifecycles, making it a preferred choice for organizations committed to enhancing their DevOps practices.

GitLab

Sample Customers

Morgan Stanley, Rakuten, Jack Henry, SoFi, Colgate, Navan

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

Buyer's Guide

Apiiro vs. GitLab

July 2025

Free Report: Apiiro vs. GitLab

Find out what your peers are saying about Apiiro vs. GitLab and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

864,155 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apiiro vs. GitLab report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors and best Software Composition Analysis (SCA) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.