Apiiro vs GitLab comparison

Apiiro and GitLab are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Apiiro is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.0, while GitLab is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.2. Apiiro holds a 0.8% mindshare in SAST, compared to GitLab’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Apiiro users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of GitLab users who would recommend it.

Apiiro

Read 3 Apiiro reviews

1,611 Views
1,095 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitLab

Read 88 GitLab reviews

17,371 Views
2,779 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Apiiro

GitLab

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

GitLab and Apiiro are key players in the software development and security management markets. GitLab appears to have an edge in terms of affordability and integration, whereas Apiiro stands out for sophisticated risk management capabilities.

Features: GitLab provides valuable features for seamless integration, collaboration, and a comprehensive support system. It is recognized for offering a wide array of tools that streamline development workflows. Apiiro, on the other hand, specializes in advanced risk assessment, risk analysis capabilities, and features tailored for security-focused organizations. Both products deliver excellent functionality, but Apiiro's focus on security provides a specific advantage for risk-conscious users.

Room for Improvement: GitLab users have expressed the need for enhanced performance speed, better integration with third-party tools, and more user-friendly configuration options. Apiiro customers seek more intuitive configuration processes, clearer documentation, and simpler setups. Addressing these areas can broaden their usability and effectiveness for different organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitLab's deployment is generally straightforward, with users appreciating its reliable customer support. Its user-friendly nature is well-suited for teams with limited deployment experience. Apiiro, while somewhat more complex to deploy, benefits from dedicated support teams that enhance issue resolution. These teams are knowledgeable and facilitate a smoother deployment experience, despite its in-depth customization needs.

Pricing and ROI: GitLab is considered cost-effective, offering satisfactory ROI and manageable setup costs. Apiiro involves higher initial costs but is justified through its robust risk mitigation features, providing significant returns. The premium pricing of Apiiro is balanced by its offering of superior security enhancements, making it attractive to tech buyers focusing on security.

To learn more, read our detailed Apiiro vs. GitLab Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apiiro vs. GitLab

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apiiro

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

24th

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

14th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Security (14th), Software Supply Chain Security (8th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (16th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (7th)

GitLab

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

8th

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (12th), Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Rapid Application Development Software (10th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Apiiro is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitLab is 2.2%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitLab	2.2%
Apiiro	0.8%
Other	97.0%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Kunal M

Capability Center Leader, ETRM Platforms at Shell

Comprehensive risk analysis helps identify key performance trends but report access needs improvement

My first feedback for Apiiro is that it is very slow, extremely slow. The moment I select from the entire list of repositories in my vertical, which is almost more than 400 repositories, it takes a lot of time for me to load the report. Sometimes it fails. I do not have Role-Based Access Control (RBAC). It's only given to the application security team, and Apiiro as a vendor does not have the rollback access control enabled for the clients, so that would have given me access to the reports tab, which would have made my life easier. Currently, I have to go to the risks tab to pull out all this information. I started exploring dashboards with Copilot. I need to reach out to the Apiiro teams to see if I can get an access token so that I can pull out a Power BI dashboard. I think Apiiro definitely has its own capabilities, but if there are access tokens that teams can use to build a custom dashboard, that would be great. This might already exist, but that is something which will ease the vulnerability management day-to-day activities.

Read full review

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements

The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The workflow automation is likely the best aspect of the solution."

"Apiiro's secrets detection feature has saved us several times, which we appreciate greatly."

"The positive impact I have seen from working with Apiiro for my company includes the metrics that we get from Apiiro, which have been extremely helpful."

"I like that you can use GitLab as a double-sided solution for both DevOps and version management. It's a good product for working in these two areas, and the user interface makes it easy to understand."

"I recommend GitLab for DevOps engineers."

"Of all available products, it was the easiest to use and easy to install."

"We use the Git repository and tagging feature. We are a product-based company and use this solution to move to a forward or backward tag."

"GitLab is a solution for source code management, container registry, pipelines, testing, and deployment."

"I like that it's easy to deploy our services over GitLab. The customer support is also good with a really active community. You have a lot of support that you can get online with your stack. That is probably one of the benefits of using GitLab. It's also really fast."

"We're only using the basic features of GitLab and haven't used any advanced features. The solution works fine, so that's what we like about GitLab. We're party using GitHub and GitLab. We have a GitHub server, while we use GitLab locally or only within our team, and it works okay. We don't have any significant problems with the solution. We also found the straightforward setup, stability, and scalability of GitLab valuable."

"It scales well."

More GitLab pros

Cons

"User management is a little bit clunky."

"I would like support for our self-hosted Git server, other than GitHub, just regular Git."

"Technologies are always changing. Nowadays, new things like serverless computing and workload management have emerged. We have noticed a few gap items for faster service delivery. For example, we do user interface testing in the latest team and automate it using some tools. Recently, we integrated a tool with user interface testing, which can simulate a multi-user environment. So, we would like to see more integration with different platforms."

"GitLab can improve the integration with third-party applications. It could be made easier. Additionally, having API control from my application could be helpful."

"Reporting could be improved."

"There was a problem with the build environment when we were looking at developing iOS applications. iOS build require Mac machines and there are no Mac machines provided by GitLab in their cloud. So to build for mobile iOS application, we needed to use our own Mac machine within our own infrastructure. If GitLab were to provide a feature such that an iOS application could also be built through GitLab directly, that would be great."

"I believe there's room for improvement in the advanced features, particularly in enhancing the pipeline functionalities."

"As a partner, sometimes it's difficult to get support. They have a really complicated procedure for their support."

"I'm new to GitLab, so I would appreciate more documentation about the code and commands."

"The self-hosted version of GitLab is not very stable when under load. It slows down and requires restarts every few days."

More GitLab cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version."

"I don't mind the price because I use the free version."

"GitLab is an open-source solution."

"GitLab is cheap."

"I'm not sure if they have some kind of discount. I've been negotiating with them on prices before, and I believe they weren't too happy to give discounts, but list prices are $19 per user, per month for Premium and $99 per user, per month for Ultimate. So, the difference between Premium and Ultimate is a bit bigger, and in most companies, you need to build some type of business case."

"We are currently using the open-source version."

"The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."

"The solution is free."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	36
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	43

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Apiiro?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Apiiro?

My only use case is the reporting, which is correct. My role is limited because this is an additional role that I do on top of my day job, so it is only limited to pulling out reports and working w...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Apiiro?

I haven't explored Apiiro's advanced risk analysis features. I have not used the compliance monitoring feature of Apiiro so far. I am learning about Apiiro's AI-driven analytics for real-time feedb...

See all answers

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

We are currently using general GitLab, not GitLab Premium.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

GitLab can be improved by being more responsive in the UI and offering better pricing for premium features, which would be useful for small startups. While GitLab's CI/CD is powerful, it is somewha...

See all answers

Comparisons

Snyk vs Apiiro

Compared 23% of the time

Cycode vs Apiiro

Compared 12% of the time

SonarQube vs Apiiro

Compared 11% of the time

Legit Security vs Apiiro

Compared 10% of the time

Ox Security vs Apiiro

Compared 9% of the time

More Apiiro Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 46% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 8% of the time

SonarQube vs GitLab

Compared 4% of the time

TeamCity vs GitLab

Compared 4% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 4% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apiiro

December 2025

Download Apiiro product report

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

December 2025

Download GitLab product report

Also Known As

Apiiro Control Plane (ASOC), Apiiro API Security (SAST), Apiiro Open Source (SCA)

Fuzzit

Overview

Apiiro is the leader in application security posture management (ASPM), unifying risk visibility, prioritization, and remediation with deep code analysis and runtime context.

Companies like Morgan Stanley, SoFi, Rakuten, and Navan leverage Apiiro's ASPM to...

Get complete application and risk visibility: Apiiro takes a deep, code-based approach to ASPM. Its Cloud Application Security Platform analyzes source code and pulls in runtime context to build a continuous, graph-based inventory of application and software supply chain components.

Prioritize risks with code-to-runtime context: With its proprietary Risk Graph™️, Apiiro contextualizes security alerts from third-party tools and native security solutions based on the likelihood and impact of risk to uniquely minimize alert backlogs and triage time by 95%.

Fix and prevent risks that matter—faster: By tying risks to code owners, providing LLM-enriched remediation guidance, and embedding risk-based guardrails directly into developer tools and workflows, Apiiro improves remediation times (MTTR) by up to 85%.

Apiiro's native security solutions include API security testing in code, secrets detection and validation, software bill of materials (SBOM) generation, sensitive data exposure prevention, software composition analysis (SCA), and CI/CD and SCM security.

Apiiro

GitLab offers a secure and user-friendly platform for CI/CD pipeline management, code repository control, and collaboration, enhancing development speed and efficiency. It facilitates automation with extensive customization and tool integration, ideal for DevOps processes.

GitLab supports source code management, version control, and collaborative development. It's frequently used in CI/CD processes to automate builds and deployments while integrating DevOps practices. GitLab allows companies to manage repositories, automate pipelines, conduct code reviews, and maintain development lifecycles. The platform supports infrastructure and configuration management, enabling efficient code collaboration, deployment automation, and comprehensive repository handling. Many organizations commit and deploy developed code using GitLab's capabilities.

What are GitLab's most valuable features?

CI/CD Pipeline Management: Streamlines development through automated testing and deployment.
User-Friendly Interface: Ensures ease of collaboration and task automation.
Code Merging and Branching: Facilitates smooth code integration and version control.
Security Platform: Provides strong security features for safe development.
Tool Integration: Enhances functionality with diverse tool integration.

What benefits should users evaluate?

Development Speed: Accelerates processes through automation.
Collaboration Ease: Simplifies team interactions and workflow.
Customization Options: Offers extensive personalization for specific needs.
Comprehensive Documentation: Provides detailed guidance for users.
Secure Platform: Maintains integrity with robust security features.

In specific industries, GitLab serves as a backbone for source code management and CI/CD implementation. Companies leverage its capabilities for infrastructure management and deployment automation, thus streamlining project delivery timelines. Its ability to handle configuration management and code repositories effectively aids in maintaining development lifecycles, making it a preferred choice for organizations committed to enhancing their DevOps practices.

GitLab

Sample Customers

Morgan Stanley, Rakuten, Jack Henry, SoFi, Colgate, Navan

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

Buyer's Guide

Apiiro vs. GitLab

December 2025

Free Report: Apiiro vs. GitLab

Find out what your peers are saying about Apiiro vs. GitLab and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apiiro vs. GitLab report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors and best Software Composition Analysis (SCA) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.