Apiiro vs GitLab comparison

Apiiro and GitLab are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Apiiro is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0, while GitLab is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3. Apiiro holds a 0.8% mindshare in SAST, compared to GitLab’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Apiiro users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of GitLab users who would recommend it.

Apiiro

Read 3 Apiiro reviews

1,576 Views
1,119 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitLab

Read 87 GitLab reviews

18,203 Views
2,912 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Apiiro

GitLab

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

GitLab and Apiiro are key players in the software development and security management markets. GitLab appears to have an edge in terms of affordability and integration, whereas Apiiro stands out for sophisticated risk management capabilities.

Features: GitLab provides valuable features for seamless integration, collaboration, and a comprehensive support system. It is recognized for offering a wide array of tools that streamline development workflows. Apiiro, on the other hand, specializes in advanced risk assessment, risk analysis capabilities, and features tailored for security-focused organizations. Both products deliver excellent functionality, but Apiiro's focus on security provides a specific advantage for risk-conscious users.

Room for Improvement: GitLab users have expressed the need for enhanced performance speed, better integration with third-party tools, and more user-friendly configuration options. Apiiro customers seek more intuitive configuration processes, clearer documentation, and simpler setups. Addressing these areas can broaden their usability and effectiveness for different organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitLab's deployment is generally straightforward, with users appreciating its reliable customer support. Its user-friendly nature is well-suited for teams with limited deployment experience. Apiiro, while somewhat more complex to deploy, benefits from dedicated support teams that enhance issue resolution. These teams are knowledgeable and facilitate a smoother deployment experience, despite its in-depth customization needs.

Pricing and ROI: GitLab is considered cost-effective, offering satisfactory ROI and manageable setup costs. Apiiro involves higher initial costs but is justified through its robust risk mitigation features, providing significant returns. The premium pricing of Apiiro is balanced by its offering of superior security enhancements, making it attractive to tech buyers focusing on security.

To learn more, read our detailed Apiiro vs. GitLab Report (Updated: November 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apiiro vs. GitLab

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,869 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apiiro

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

20th

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Security (12th), Software Supply Chain Security (8th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (13th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (6th)

GitLab

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

7th

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (11th), Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Rapid Application Development Software (11th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (3rd), DevSecOps (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Apiiro is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitLab is 2.3%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitLab	2.3%
Apiiro	0.8%
Other	96.9%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Kunal M

Capability Center Leader, ETRM Platforms at Shell

Comprehensive risk analysis helps identify key performance trends but report access needs improvement

My first feedback for Apiiro is that it is very slow, extremely slow. The moment I select from the entire list of repositories in my vertical, which is almost more than 400 repositories, it takes a lot of time for me to load the report. Sometimes it fails. I do not have Role-Based Access Control (RBAC). It's only given to the application security team, and Apiiro as a vendor does not have the rollback access control enabled for the clients, so that would have given me access to the reports tab, which would have made my life easier. Currently, I have to go to the risks tab to pull out all this information. I started exploring dashboards with Copilot. I need to reach out to the Apiiro teams to see if I can get an access token so that I can pull out a Power BI dashboard. I think Apiiro definitely has its own capabilities, but if there are access tokens that teams can use to build a custom dashboard, that would be great. This might already exist, but that is something which will ease the vulnerability management day-to-day activities.

Read full review

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements

The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The workflow automation is likely the best aspect of the solution."

"Apiiro's secrets detection feature has saved us several times, which we appreciate greatly."

"GitLab is kind of an image of GitHub, so it gives us the flexibility to monitor our changes in the repos."

"Git merging allows us to track the details of how and who has done what; this is the best feature which is useful for all companies."

"It is user-friendly, easy to use, and easy to administer."

"The most valuable aspects of GitLab are the ability to create branches, merge branches, and compare branches to resolve code conflicts."

"I like that you can use GitLab as a double-sided solution for both DevOps and version management. It's a good product for working in these two areas, and the user interface makes it easy to understand."

"I recommend GitLab for DevOps engineers."

"It is scalable."

"The stability of GitLab is impressive."

More GitLab pros

Cons

"I would like support for our self-hosted Git server, other than GitHub, just regular Git."

"User management is a little bit clunky."

"GitLab could improve by having more plugins and better user-friendliness."

"GitLab doesn't have AWS integration. It would be better to have integration with other container management environments beyond Kubernetes. It has very good integration with Kubernetes, but it doesn't have good integration with, for example, AWS, ETS, etc."

"The only thing our company is really waiting on in terms of features is the development of metrics."

"It would be really good if they integrated more features in application security."

"The licensing model could be improved to be more accommodating in terms of user numbers and costs."

"GitLab needs to improve the CI/CD functionality because it is not compatible with Jenkins and other tools, as it is not that efficient."

"It would be better if there weren't any outages. There are occasions where we usually see a lot of outages using GitLab. It happens at least once a week or something like that. Whatever pipelines you're running, to check the logs, you need to have a different set of tools like Argus or something like that. If you have pipelines running on GitLab, you need a separate service deployed to view the logs, which is kind of a pain. If the logs can be used conveniently on GitLab, that would be definitely helpful. I'm not talking about the CI/CD pipelines but the back-end services and microservices deployed over GitLab. To view the logs for those microservices, you need to have separate log viewers, which is kind of a pain."

"The pricing model of GitLab is an issue for me."

More GitLab cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"GitLab is highly priced for smaller teams, but it's okay if considering a user base of thousands."

"In terms of the pricing for GitLab, on a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being cheap, I'm rating pricing for the solution a four. It could still be cheaper because right now, my company has a small team, and sometimes it's difficult to use a paid product for a small team. You'd hope the team will grow and scale, but currently, you're paying a high license fee for a small team. I'm referring to the GitLab license that has premium features and will give you all features. This can be a problem for management to approve the high price of the license for a team this small."

"The solution is based on a licensing model that includes technical support and is paid annually."

"The price is okay."

"I'm not sure if they have some kind of discount. I've been negotiating with them on prices before, and I believe they weren't too happy to give discounts, but list prices are $19 per user, per month for Premium and $99 per user, per month for Ultimate. So, the difference between Premium and Ultimate is a bit bigger, and in most companies, you need to build some type of business case."

"Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version."

"Regarding pricing, I would rate GitLab as moderately priced, maybe around a seven or eight out of ten. It could be more flexible for clients but generally offers good value."

"This is an open-source solution."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,869 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	35
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	42

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apiiro?

Apiiro's secrets detection feature has saved us several times, which we appreciate greatly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apiiro?

My understanding is the pricing is pretty competitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apiiro?

See all answers

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

We are currently using general GitLab, not GitLab Premium.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

GitLab needs to improve the CI/CD functionality because it is not compatible with Jenkins and other tools, as it is not that efficient. Security-wise, we have security features enabled in GitLab fo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Snyk vs Apiiro

Compared 29% of the time

Cycode vs Apiiro

Compared 15% of the time

Ox Security vs Apiiro

Compared 13% of the time

Legit Security vs Apiiro

Compared 12% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Apiiro

Compared 8% of the time

More Apiiro Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 41% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 10% of the time

TeamCity vs GitLab

Compared 4% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 4% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 3% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apiiro

November 2025

Download Apiiro product report

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

October 2025

Download GitLab product report

Also Known As

Apiiro Control Plane (ASOC), Apiiro API Security (SAST), Apiiro Open Source (SCA)

Fuzzit

Overview

Apiiro is the leader in application security posture management (ASPM), unifying risk visibility, prioritization, and remediation with deep code analysis and runtime context.

Companies like Morgan Stanley, SoFi, Rakuten, and Navan leverage Apiiro's ASPM to...

Get complete application and risk visibility: Apiiro takes a deep, code-based approach to ASPM. Its Cloud Application Security Platform analyzes source code and pulls in runtime context to build a continuous, graph-based inventory of application and software supply chain components.

Prioritize risks with code-to-runtime context: With its proprietary Risk Graph™️, Apiiro contextualizes security alerts from third-party tools and native security solutions based on the likelihood and impact of risk to uniquely minimize alert backlogs and triage time by 95%.

Fix and prevent risks that matter—faster: By tying risks to code owners, providing LLM-enriched remediation guidance, and embedding risk-based guardrails directly into developer tools and workflows, Apiiro improves remediation times (MTTR) by up to 85%.

Apiiro's native security solutions include API security testing in code, secrets detection and validation, software bill of materials (SBOM) generation, sensitive data exposure prevention, software composition analysis (SCA), and CI/CD and SCM security.

Apiiro

GitLab offers a secure and user-friendly platform for CI/CD pipeline management, code repository control, and collaboration, enhancing development speed and efficiency. It facilitates automation with extensive customization and tool integration, ideal for DevOps processes.

GitLab supports source code management, version control, and collaborative development. It's frequently used in CI/CD processes to automate builds and deployments while integrating DevOps practices. GitLab allows companies to manage repositories, automate pipelines, conduct code reviews, and maintain development lifecycles. The platform supports infrastructure and configuration management, enabling efficient code collaboration, deployment automation, and comprehensive repository handling. Many organizations commit and deploy developed code using GitLab's capabilities.

What are GitLab's most valuable features?

CI/CD Pipeline Management: Streamlines development through automated testing and deployment.
User-Friendly Interface: Ensures ease of collaboration and task automation.
Code Merging and Branching: Facilitates smooth code integration and version control.
Security Platform: Provides strong security features for safe development.
Tool Integration: Enhances functionality with diverse tool integration.

What benefits should users evaluate?

Development Speed: Accelerates processes through automation.
Collaboration Ease: Simplifies team interactions and workflow.
Customization Options: Offers extensive personalization for specific needs.
Comprehensive Documentation: Provides detailed guidance for users.
Secure Platform: Maintains integrity with robust security features.

In specific industries, GitLab serves as a backbone for source code management and CI/CD implementation. Companies leverage its capabilities for infrastructure management and deployment automation, thus streamlining project delivery timelines. Its ability to handle configuration management and code repositories effectively aids in maintaining development lifecycles, making it a preferred choice for organizations committed to enhancing their DevOps practices.

GitLab

Sample Customers

Morgan Stanley, Rakuten, Jack Henry, SoFi, Colgate, Navan

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

Buyer's Guide

Apiiro vs. GitLab

November 2025

Free Report: Apiiro vs. GitLab

Find out what your peers are saying about Apiiro vs. GitLab and other solutions. Updated: November 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,869 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apiiro vs. GitLab report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors and best Software Composition Analysis (SCA) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.