Apiary vs WSO2 API Manager comparison

Oracle and WSO2 are both solutions in the API Management category. Oracle is ranked #37, while WSO2 is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.8. Oracle holds a 0.4% mindshare in APIM, compared to WSO2’s 5.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.

Apiary

Read 4 Apiary reviews

405 Views
204 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WSO2 API Manager

Read 41 WSO2 API Manager reviews

5,669 Views
4,012 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Apiary

WSO2 API Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Apiary and WSO2 API Manager are competing products in the API management sector. Apiary is known for its straightforward setup and support, whereas WSO2 API Manager is favored for its robust capabilities, despite a higher cost.

Features:Apiary is prized for its design-first approach, emphasizing API documentation and easy testing, while also supporting Swagger and Blueprint. It offers GitHub integration and reusable objects for efficient API design. WSO2 API Manager provides high customization, scalability, and extensive integration support. Its feature set includes containerization, micro-gateway capabilities, and API lifecycle management, suitable for demanding enterprise environments.

Room for Improvement:Apiary could enhance features for larger enterprises, such as advanced customization and scalability. Adding more integration options and extending its API testing capabilities would also be beneficial. WSO2 API Manager could improve its ease of configuration and streamline its deployment process. Expanding newer API security features and better simplifying documentation for newcomers may enhance user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Apiary's deployment process is typically straightforward, which supports rapid adoption. Its customer service is responsive and personalized. In contrast, WSO2 API Manager, requiring more IT resources for setup, benefits larger organizations. It relies more on extensive documentation and community support to aid its users.

Pricing and ROI:Apiary offers a cost-effective solution with quick ROI, making it ideal for small to medium businesses. WSO2 API Manager, with a higher initial investment, provides a substantial ROI through advanced features and scalability, particularly suited for complex and large-scale deployments.

To learn more, read our detailed Apiary vs. WSO2 API Manager Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apiary vs. WSO2 API Manager

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apiary

Ranking in API Management

37th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WSO2 API Manager

Ranking in API Management

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Apiary is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 API Manager is 5.0%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

Phil Wilkins

Enterprise Integration Architect at Capgemini

The ability to configure rules to check for consistency has helped

Apiary provides a free tier of the platform which allows a small group of developers to collaborate easily on the design of open source APIs. In addition to this, it provides mock endpoints allowing people to experiment with the API without depending or having to stand up a real backend. With our clients, using Apiary allows us to very quickly pull together an API definition (particularly when using API Blueprint). The whole API design process for the simpler use cases can be done in a relatively short workshop which makes it a lot easier to agree, publish, version-manage an API definition with suitable documentation. This can then be evolved and enhanced (particularly in the documentation aspects). With the ability to support Swagger (Open API v2 and introducing/ed support for v3) and API Blueprint makes it a very versatile tool.

Read full review

VishalSingh14

IT Engineer at Reliance Industries Ltd

Easy to deploy APIs and easy to manage CORS configuration

I have used WSO2 Store and WSO2 API Manager at the architecture level. I worked on two versions, namely WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0 and 5.7.0. I have also worked with WSO2 Identity Server versions 5.7 and 5.11. There are certain things that Apigee handles better than WSO2 API Manager. The user interface of WSO2 API Manager is much easier than that of Apigee. The scope of flexibility was much greater in Apigee. In WSO2 API Manager, we had little flexibility and were restricted to a specific software or tool. On the other hand, we had the scope of customization in Apigee.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Quick and easy way to share a new API design with teams."

"I find the generation of mock services very useful, especially when demonstrating for new consumers."

"Git integration"

"I do like the overall performance of the solution."

"In two years, there was one time the service was down for an hour or so."

"The solution is open-source."

"WSO2 API Manager is a stable solution."

"The documentation is good."

"It is possible to scale up and scale down with the solution...I can say that I have not seen any issues related to scalability."

"As far as I am aware this solution is the first API Publisher that allows you to create and publish API and to manage the API lifecycle."

"The most interesting feature is its Mac-based function."

"The capability to define processes and seamless integration with APIs enhances our operations."

"I think the best part about WSO2 API Manager is that it's highly customizable because it's open-source. The partnership model is quite lucrative for us, it helps us to go and pitch to our customers. You can build a lot of business models yourself that you want to use. You are able to do a lot of the solutions."

More WSO2 API Manager pros

Cons

"I would like an integrated option to download a Swagger version of the definition."

"The Oracle release cycle is very bad because the patches only update once a year."

"Swagger (OpenAPI Specification) and Blueprint Support"

"Based on our recent large scaling project, the latency needs to be improved."

"Basically, mTLS is a certificate-based communication protocol that WSO2 API Manager doesn't support."

"The solution could be more user friendly for engineers."

"The professional support and licensing aspects of WSO have been a challenge."

"Lacks some new features and updated functionalities."

"The tool's commercial aspect could be improved. Pricing varies with partners, so selecting the appropriate pricing can be challenging."

"WSO2 API Manager could improve the API approval system."

"I think they could greatly improve the general UX with their solutions."

More WSO2 API Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a free subscription option to start and try the service."

"It is easy to get started with personal (free) accounts, but a subscription is required for additional features."

"We use the open-source version of WSO2 API Manager, there is no cost."

"It is costly, around ten thousand per year, per instance"

"WSO2 API Manager is an open-source solution."

"It is an open-source product."

"WSO2 API Manager is a low-cost solution. It is one of the most affordable solutions."

"It's not expensive, but it could be cheaper."

"There is a subscription-based pricing structure and also the open-sourced version available."

"We have not opted for the paid version of WSO2 but we have implemented the free and open source WSO2 software to a great extent and it is working as per our expectation."

More WSO2 API Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about WSO2 API Manager?

It is possible to scale up and scale down with the solution...I can say that I have not seen any issues related to scalability.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WSO2 API Manager?

We have encountered some concerns with concurrency. Our integrations do not handle high-volume transactions, and when benchmarking, some issues arose with concurrent testing. It is uncertain whethe...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for WSO2 API Manager?

We use WSO2 API Manager ( /products/wso2-api-manager-reviews ) to integrate our telecom products with third-party REST APIs. We are orchestrating services where our business process defines the int...

See all answers

Comparisons

Postman vs Apiary

Compared 40% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Apiary

Compared 31% of the time

Oracle API Platform Cloud Service vs Apiary

Compared 29% of the time

More Apiary Competitors

Apigee vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 20% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 19% of the time

Apache APISIX vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 14% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 11% of the time

More WSO2 API Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

API Management

June 2025

Download Apiary product report

Buyer's Guide

WSO2 API Manager

June 2025

Download WSO2 API Manager product report

Overview

Apiary's pioneering APIFlow solution provides the framework and tools for developing application programming interfaces (APIs) that share enterprise services and data and help create modern, cloud-based applications and experiences. APIFlow spans the API creation lifecycle, including design, governance, testing, and documentation, while supporting API Blueprint and OpenAPI industry standardsץ

Oracle

WSO2 API Manager is a comprehensive platform that allows organizations to design, publish, and manage APIs.

It provides a centralized interface for API governance, security, and analytics.

With features like API monetization and developer portal, it enables businesses to drive innovation and create new revenue streams.

WSO2

Sample Customers

Microsoft, salesforce.com, Bloomberg, GoodData, Viacom, Akamai Technologies, DigitalGlobe

1. eBay 2. StubHub 3. Cisco 4. Verizon 5. T-Mobile 6. Vodafone 7. Orange 8. BT Group 9. Telstra 10. Deutsche Telekom 11. Swisscom 12. AT&T 13. Sprint 14. Telefonica 15. O2 16. British Airways 17. Lufthansa 18. Emirates 19. Qatar Airways 20. Etihad Airways 21. Air France 22. KLM 23. American Express 24. Visa 25. Mastercard 26. PayPal 27. Western Union 28. Citibank 29. HSBC 30. Barclays 31. Santander 32. Goldman Sachs

Buyer's Guide

Apiary vs. WSO2 API Manager

June 2025

Free Report: Apiary vs. WSO2 API Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Apiary vs. WSO2 API Manager and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apiary vs. WSO2 API Manager report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.