No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Apache NiFi vs IBM Streams comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Apache NiFi
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Compute Service (5th)
IBM Streams
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Streaming Analytics (24th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Apache NiFi and IBM Streams aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Apache NiFi is designed for Compute Service and holds a mindshare of 7.6%, down 9.3% compared to last year.
IBM Streams, on the other hand, focuses on Streaming Analytics, holds 2.2% mindshare, up 0.9% since last year.
Compute Service Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Apache NiFi7.6%
Amazon EC215.2%
AWS Lambda15.1%
Other62.1%
Compute Service
Streaming Analytics Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
IBM Streams2.2%
Databricks7.5%
Apache Flink7.5%
Other82.8%
Streaming Analytics
 

Featured Reviews

YV
architect with 51-200 employees
Unified data flows have simplified large-scale ingestion and have improved SLA reliability
Improvements can be made in the way of the UI. From the deployment perspective, Git configurations are available in 2.6 versions and 2.0 and later versions of Apache NiFi. Before 2.0, templates had to be created and stored in Apache NiFi Registry, which is available. However, templates still need to be imported and exported manually if moving from one environment to another environment. Even in 2.0 versions, although GitHub configurations are available, how it will function needs to be evaluated. Seamless CI/CD deployments are somewhat tricky and challenging when it comes to Apache NiFi with the proper approvals, moving that flow to another environment, and giving the proper RBAC controls. These are areas that could be improved. Documentation is adequate, but the only pain point is the deployment aspect.
Ahmed_Emad - PeerSpot reviewer
Territory Sales Leader at Sumerge
A solution for data pipelines but has connector limitations
We have used Kafka for seven years. IBM streams gives you many OOTB features that can boost the time-to-market, especially when it comes to reporting and monitoring for example. Confluent is recognized as one of the leaders in this space and the main reason for this is related to the complete vision of the platform also the large number of connectors. This gives the edge and competitive advatnage.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The ease of use in Apache NiFi has helped my team because anyone can learn how to use it in a short amount of time, so we were able to get a lot of work done."
"We used other solutions previously, but this is the best one; it is more stable, easier to use, and deploys quickly."
"The user interface is good and makes it easy to design very popular workflows."
"NiFi works on data and file levels, streamlining real-time data processes."
"It is really good when it comes to dealing with pipelines."
"It's very handy, I like building the independent flow, an automated flow where you can build a flow from source to destination, then do the transformation in between."
"Apache NiFi has positively impacted the organization by making development really easy, allowing efficient design and development, and enabling code reuse which has reduced the development effort."
"It is highly effective for handling real-time data by working with APIs for immediate and continuous data extraction."
"Easy development and deployment, Java implementation features, and the real time analyser and alarm function are the most valuable features for us."
"The product has enabled us to create solutions to client problems that would have either been impossible or very expensive/difficult using other technologies."
"The OEM Solution (Excel-medical.com) running on top of IBM Streams provides real-time clinical algorithms that can give better insight into the patient's acuity, thus cutting off time to discharge patients and inversely making sure that sick patients don't get discharged until ready."
"As a result, the TELCO company was able to cut down the time it took to respond to customer needs and there were fewer complaints."
 

Cons

"Seamless CI/CD deployments are somewhat tricky and challenging when it comes to Apache NiFi with the proper approvals, moving that flow to another environment, and giving the proper RBAC controls."
"As I mentioned, it lacks organization, so when we scale out, we want a tool that is organized better than Apache NiFi."
"The overall stability of this solution could be improved."
"More features must be added to the product."
"The reason I rate Apache NiFi a seven is that most development folks are afraid to start using Apache NiFi because, to begin with, it does not always directly make sense."
"I would suggest continuous improvements regarding the custom developer-built processors, as many times the errors that arise are not useful."
"Improvements in the user interface to make it easier to use would be beneficial, and adding more security features would make Apache NiFi more secure and robust."
"Scalability for Apache NiFi is a problem; it does not scale as well as other Spark solutions."
"The development IDE sometimes crashes and freezes."
"I’d like to see a tool kit specifically targeted at incremental machine learning. It’s already great for scoring previously trained models, but dynamically updating models is currently more of a 'grow your own' kind of thing."
"We had some stability issues where we used embedded Zookeeper in production."
"The price and versatility of this product need to improve - it is not inexpensive."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We use the free version of Apache NiFi."
"It's an open-source solution."
"I used the tool's free version."
"The solution is open-source."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.
910,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Outsourcing Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Government
18%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Construction Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise17
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache NiFi?
The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was fine, as the integration with the AWS Marketplace was very good. The pricing in Italy is considered a little bit high, but the product is ...
What needs improvement with Apache NiFi?
Adding transformation capabilities is crucial. Apache NiFi is very powerful at ingestion but it needs to be powerful also at the transformation part. We don't use it for the transformation part and...
What is your primary use case for Apache NiFi?
Apache NiFi is mainly used for data ingestion only, functioning as an extraction tool to extract and load data. It is not particularly strong at the transformation part, but it excels at the ingest...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
IBM InfoSphere Streams
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Macquarie Telecom Group, Dovestech, Slovak Telekom, Looker, Hastings Group
Globo TV, All England Lawn Tennis Club, CenterPoint Energy, Consolidated Communications Holdings, Darwin Ecosystem, Emory University Hospital, ICICI Securities, Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT), Living Roads, Mobileum, Optibus, Southern Ontario Smart Computing Innovation Platform (SOSCIP), University of Alberta, University of Montana, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Wimbledon 2015
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Apache, Zadara and others in Compute Service. Updated: August 2026.
910,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.