We performed a comparison between Apache Airflow and Genpact Cora SeQuence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."Since Apache works very well on Python, we can manage everything and create pipelines there."
"The solution is quite configurable so it is easy to code within a configuration kind of environment."
"The UI is very simple and easy to learn."
"It's stable."
"We're running it on a virtual server, which we can easily upgrade if needed."
"The solution is flexible for all programming languages for all frameworks."
"Every feature in Apache Airflow is valuable. The number of operators and features I've used are mainly related to connectivity services and integrated services because I primarily work with GCP."
"The product integrates well with other pipelines and solutions."
"The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good."
"It is very stable. There is no downtime."
"Apache Airflow should have better integration with cloud platforms."
"Technical support is an area that needs improvement."
"Adding more automated components in Apache Airflow for basic things like exporting the data would be helpful."
"I would like to see some no-code capabilities and drag and drop abilities in Airflow."
"Programmatically, it's very good, and it doesn't have any competitors, but you cannot develop anything in Airflow UI. You need to develop everything within the program. In the market, other tools have come up recently as competitors to Airflow, and they also give graphical programming options, whereas Airflow doesn't provide that feature currently. All the DAGs you want to build need to be coded in Python."
"We need to develop our workflow description and notations because out of the box, Apache Airflow does not provide some features that are needed."
"The scalability of the solution itself is not as we expected. Being on the cloud, it should be easy to scale, however, it's not."
"The dashboards could be enhanced."
"The setup and configuration is complex."
"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly."
Earn 20 points
Apache Airflow is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 29 reviews while Genpact Cora SeQuence is ranked 38th in Business Process Management (BPM). Apache Airflow is rated 7.8, while Genpact Cora SeQuence is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Apache Airflow writes "Enable seamless integration with various connectivity and integrated services, including BigQuery and Python operators ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Genpact Cora SeQuence writes "It is a very stable and scalable product without downtime". Apache Airflow is most compared with Camunda, Informatica Cloud API and App Integration, IBM BPM, AWS Step Functions and IBM Business Automation Workflow, whereas Genpact Cora SeQuence is most compared with Appian, IBM BPM, Hubble and Tungsten TotalAgility.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.