Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amplitude vs Heap vs Pendo comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Web Analytics category, the mindshare of Amplitude is 16.3%, up from 13.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Heap is 5.2%, down from 6.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pendo is 4.4%, up from 4.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Web Analytics Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Amplitude16.3%
Heap5.2%
Pendo4.4%
Other74.1%
Web Analytics
 

Featured Reviews

LeslieTaylor - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers depth of analytics and powerful visualization capabilities
Amplitude played a crucial role in improving product decisions for our onboarding project. By analyzing user behavior, we identified key points where customers were dropping off in the activation process. This allowed us to tailor the onboarding experience, making it more personalized and engaging, resulting in higher activation rates and improved customer retention. Integrating Amplitude with other tools in our stack improved our analytics capabilities. I didn't encounter any issues with its compatibility or functionality alongside other tools. I would recommend Amplitude to others because of its depth of analytics and powerful visualization capabilities. Overall, I would rate it as an eight out of ten.
Harshith Bejjam - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides the availability of defining events, but there could be advanced UI features
We use Heap to create user metrics, and track page visits, feature usage, and user workflows after engaging with features The product's most valuable feature was the ready-made availability of defining events, creating visuals, and storing the data in the database. The product could benefit from…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
866,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Insurance Company
6%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Computer Software Company
15%
Insurance Company
14%
Real Estate/Law Firm
11%
Financial Services Firm
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amplitude?
I loved using Amplitude because it allowed me to dive deep into product usage and analyze different customer segments.
What needs improvement with Amplitude?
The free features in Amplitude Analytics need enhancement. The limitations, such as not being able to use the splitti...
What is your primary use case for Amplitude?
I have been working with Amplitude Analytics for around one year, mainly using it alongside GMP products like Google ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Heap?
It's pretty costly, and they use the common model of impressions. It's impression-based pricing, which can be costly ...
What needs improvement with Heap?
From a user perspective, customizing the interface could offer more flexibility. Customizing and branding the visuals...
What advice do you have for others considering Heap?
Heap is quite user-friendly, featuring a primarily no-code interface for primary stakeholders. Some technical skills ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

ClearBrain
No data available
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Nokia, Yik Yak, QuizUp, CrunchBase, Rhapsody, PlanGrid, Acquia, Patreon, SeatGeek, Etermax
Zendesk, Marketo, Ernst & Young, Salesforce
Coupa, FICO, Optimizely, AOL, Mattermark, Infor, Neustar, Act-on
Find out what your peers are saying about Snowflake Computing, Amplitude, Google and others in Web Analytics. Updated: September 2025.
866,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.