Amazon S3 Glacier vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and NetApp are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.9, while NetApp is ranked #26. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 13.8% mindshare in PCSS, compared to NetApp’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

Amazon S3 Glacier

Read 42 Amazon S3 Glacier reviews

3,096 Views
2,848 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...

Read 1 NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS review

166 Views
93 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon S3 Glacier

NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon S3 Glacier and NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google, Microsoft and others in Public Cloud Storage Services.

To learn more, read our detailed Public Cloud Storage Services Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Public Cloud Storage Services

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon S3 Glacier

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

26th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (32nd), Cloud Storage (41st)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Amazon S3 Glacier is 13.8%, down from 16.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Public Cloud Storage Services Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Amazon S3 Glacier	13.8%
NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS	0.2%
Other	86.0%

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

ArunDhwaj

Technical Owner at Harman International

Versatile data storage improves security and supports increasing data volumes

Amazon S3 Glacier offers robust security features and practically infinite storage, where we can store all kinds of media swiftly. It supports various data types, including semi-structured and raw formats. These features facilitate log management and data dumping since the service is versatile enough to handle large volumes of data and provide necessary security.

Read full review

reviewer2039379

Solution Architect at a university with 10,001+ employees

Great migrations, useful integrations, and offers good data replication

The local libraries from NetApp to NetApp are good. This way, we don't have to put the middleman in between to do the transition or conversion. The NetApp Cloud Volume Services for AWS has been helping migrate workloads onto the cloud. We did migrate a couple of native applications into AWS using this, and it was helpful. In terms of the integration with AWS native services, I did not configure it by myself. There was another team who did it. That said, I presume they didn't run into any issues, which is why we are using it. While the solution did not help us reduce the amount of storage, it allowed us to have data replicated across on-premises and in the cloud, so that we have a backup in DR. While it did not reduce the footprint, it helped DR expansion. It increased redundancy. Since deploying the product, we have not been affected by ransomware or other external threats.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Amazon S3 Glacier is scalable, flexible, easy to maintain and handle."

"The deployment process was straightforward."

"The product is easy to use."

"It is the most feature-rich platform."

"The solution is easy to use."

"Amazon S3 Glacier is a highly stable solution."

"The tool is simple to use and not very expensive."

"Amazon S3 Glacier is a scalable and easy-to-manage solution with good read-write capability."

More Amazon S3 Glacier pros

"The NetApp Cloud Volume Services for AWS has been helping migrate workloads onto the cloud. We did migrate a couple of native applications into AWS using this, and it was helpful."

Cons

"The solution's pricing is too expensive and could be improved."

"The user experience must be improved."

"I would like to see improved storage capacity and enhanced security features for better protection."

"The solution's cost optimization could be improved."

"Amazon S3 Glacier is a cheaper tool if you're running it on-prem, but it is expensive if deployed on the cloud."

"However, improvement is needed in pricing and support systems."

"The product could be improved in terms of the customer support team's response times."

"The technical support has room for improvement."

More Amazon S3 Glacier cons

"We'd like the solution to be less expensive and offer lower latency."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Amazon S3 Glacier is not an expensive solution, and it has a pay-as-you-go pricing model."

"I've operated with Amazon S3 Glacier in two modes. Firstly, there's the trial mode, where I experimented with the platform, learned its functionalities, and applied it to my work. Secondly, there's the corporate account mode, where my team handles the operations, and I receive billing reports."

"The pricing is average and reasonable. It varies depending on the region."

"The price point at which the product is available is pretty good."

"Amazon S3 Glacier has good pricing."

"Amazon S3 Glacier is a cost-effective solution for archiving."

"Amazon S3 Glacier is a little expensive solution."

"We don't pay for licenses. We pay based on consumption data, considering how much data is stored."

More Amazon S3 Glacier pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

University

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Amazon's S3 Glacier or EBS (Elastic Block Store)?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon's S3 Glacier or Elastic Block Store data storage software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Amazon's S3 Glacier, whi...

See all answers

What do you like most about Amazon S3 Glacier?

I like creating buckets where data can be segregated at a high level and then routing the appropriate data to each designated bucket. In terms of value, I would say that the tool gets the job done ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon S3 Glacier?

I am not sure about improvements; so far it has been good for me. The pricing is on the higher side. I have not mentioned any features as the product is good. Pricing is my concern; this is the onl...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 53% of the time

Google Cloud Storage vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 10% of the time

Wasabi vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle Cloud Archive Storage vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 5% of the time

More Amazon S3 Glacier Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon S3 Glacier

October 2025

Download Amazon S3 Glacier product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Migration

October 2025

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS report

Download NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS product report

Also Known As

Amazon Glacier

Cloud Volumes Service for AWS, NetApp CVS for AWS, CVS for AWS

Overview

Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost cloud storage service for data archiving and long-term backup. Customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.007 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions. To keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for infrequently accessed data where a retrieval time of several hours is suitable.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

NetApp Cloud Volume Service for AWS is available in a monthly or annual subscription, and is a fast, secure, simple to consume file service that delivers advanced, enterprise-class management to your cloud applications. Move your applications without re-architecting.

NetApp

Sample Customers

King Cpunty, Illumina, Backupify, Nearmap.com, Scribd, Baylor College of Medicine, SoundCloud

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Public Cloud Storage Services

September 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google, Microsoft and others in Public Cloud Storage Services. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.