Amazon EFS and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP are competing products in the cloud file storage market. Based on user reviews, Amazon EFS is favored for its pricing and initial setup ease, but NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP stands out for its rich features and detailed customer service, making it worth the price for many users.
Features: Amazon EFS is praised for its scalability and integration with AWS services. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP receives high marks for its comprehensive management tools, hybrid cloud capabilities, and advanced data protection features. While both have valuable attributes, NetApp edges out due to its extensive feature set appealing to more complex use cases.
Room for Improvement: Users suggest Amazon EFS can improve its performance under heavy loads and introduce more flexible pricing tiers. For NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, users note the need for a simpler setup process and better integration with non-NetApp environments.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon EFS is noted for its straightforward deployment process and reliable customer support, making it accessible for users with varied technical skills. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, while slightly more complex to deploy, benefits from detailed customer service and support options, which help mitigate its challenging setup.
Pricing and ROI: Users appreciate Amazon EFS for its cost-effective pricing structure and long-term ROI. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, although perceived as more expensive, is valued for its ROI due to enhanced functionality and performance benefits.
While the time to respond was good, the time to resolve was not optimal, as it took more than a week.
Training and support depend on the plan you have, with centralized support being very helpful in case issues arise.
Amazon's support model is consistent across services.
Its auto-scaling feature is a crucial point, providing high scalability that I would rate at ten out of ten.
Elastic File Systems allow me to scale up or down easily.
It is very cost-effective, and there's no need for initial charges.
It wouldn't help with outages either; the scaling is manual, and there are no processes we've used to automate that for unexpected scenarios.
Amazon EFS is extremely stable, as it is managed by AWS.
While I experienced an EFS mount dropping, it was related to server issues rather than EFS itself.
Database-type workloads do not run properly on Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) because at the end of the day, it is a network file system and requests must travel from one place to another and then return.
Enabling AI-driven or automatic features would be beneficial for new or nontechnical users.
In my project, there are challenges related to AWS, such as ensuring proper security measures with IMS code and encryption.
My opinion is that support is generally very good. There are instances where they take longer to respond or resolve issues, especially when customers have urgent needs, but ultimately, resolution is achieved.
It would be nice to see technology supporting the Elastic Fabric Adapter on Amazon AWS, therefore getting RDMA technology for more low-latency connections.
EFS could cost around $30 to $50 per month for similar usage.
It is very cost-effective with no need for initial charges.
Elastic File Systems can be expensive due to the nature of data transfer costs.
Its ease of integration with other AWS services enhances our infrastructure, while the shared storage access improves reliability and processing continuity for our applications.
They help me process data while maintaining low latency, which is crucial for efficient data processing.
The AWS service is excellent security-wise, and I have seen some other features besides security, such as automatic scaling that helped us significantly.
The granular ability to divide up the performance and the amount of storage you want is really fantastic.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP | 7.0% |
| Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) | 3.3% |
| Other | 89.7% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 53 |
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) provides simple, scalable file storage for use with Amazon EC2 instances in the AWS Cloud. Amazon EFS is easy to use and offers a simple interface that allows you to create and configure file systems quickly and easily. With Amazon EFS, storage capacity is elastic, growing and shrinking automatically as you add and remove files, so your applications have the storage they need, when they need it.
When mounted to Amazon EC2 instances, an Amazon EFS file system provides a standard file system interface and file system access semantics, allowing you to seamlessly integrate Amazon EFS with your existing applications and tools. Multiple Amazon EC2 instances can access an Amazon EFS file system at the same time, allowing Amazon EFS to provide a common data source for workloads and applications running on more than one Amazon EC2 instance.
It’s designed for high availability and durability, and provides performance for a broad spectrum of workloads and applications, including Big Data and analytics, media processing workflows, content management, web serving, and home directories.
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is an efficient storage management solution for managing and storing data in the cloud. It offers seamless integration with cloud providers, advanced data replication capabilities, and high data protection. With reliable performance, it is ideal for industries like healthcare and finance.
We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
