AWS WAF vs Amazon CloudFront comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
6,272 views|5,464 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
17,782 views|13,844 comparisons
82% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon CloudFront and AWS WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare, Microsoft, Akamai and others in CDN.
To learn more, read our detailed CDN Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Q&A Highlights
Question: Can you share your experience on migration from Akamai Kona Site to Amazon CloudFront and AWS WAF?
Answer: From people who have helped customers migrate from Akamai Services to Amazon CloudFront and AWS WAF, here's information on the migration process: The migration process may involve the following steps, as reported by others: Assess your current Akamai configuration, including identifying all of the content you deliver through Akamai and any specific rules or settings you are using. Design your new Amazon CloudFront and AWS WAF configuration, including choosing the right Amazon CloudFront distribution type, configuring caching and delivery settings, and creating AWS WAF rules to protect your content. Migrate your content to Amazon CloudFront by uploading files to Amazon CloudFront or using a CloudFront Content Delivery Network (CDN) migration tool. Once your content has been migrated to Amazon CloudFront, you must update your DNS records to point to Amazon CloudFront instead of Akamai. Once your DNS records have been updated, test your new Amazon CloudFront and AWS WAF configuration to ensure it works as expected. Many have shared that their experience using Amazon CloudFront and AWS WAF has been positive and that Amazon CloudFront is a reliable and scalable CDN you could use to deliver content to users worldwide with high performance. At the same time, AWS WAF is a powerful Web Application Firewall that can protect your content from various attacks.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the speed of delivery.""The distribution aspect of CloudFront and its ability to reduce latency are most beneficial.""The solution has good security features.""It is stable.""The speed and usability of the solution are valuable.""The product’s most valuable feature is the availability of the websites.""The tool is highly available and reliable. It helps to access server applications easily. Integrating Amazon CloudFront with other AWS services was very easy, I would rate it eight out of ten.""The beneficial feature for the entire AWS community is the presence of edge location servers. These servers are strategically located in multiple locations, allowing efficient content delivery from the nearest server."

More Amazon CloudFront Pros →

"We do not have to maintain the solution.""The most valuable feature is the addition of managed tools that help us create customizable rules. In case we want to block a particular request, we can make use of those rules.""The ability to take multiple data sets and match those data sets together is the solution's most valuable feature. The data lake that comes with it is very useful because that allows us to match data sets with different configurations that we wouldn't normally be able to match.""One common use case is using detection protection for enhancing security models in AWS. Another use case is implementing log analysis and response recovery procedures for email services.""If hackers try to insert bugs, the tool blocks it.""The interface is good.""The web solution effectively protects from vulnerabilities and cyber attacks.""The most valuable features of AWS WAF are its cloud-native and on-demand."

More AWS WAF Pros →

Cons
"Sometimes, the server goes down automatically.""There is room for improvement in customer service and support.""They could be expanding the number of locations available. It will help users easily access content.""The support must be improved.""Amazon CloudFront can improve by accurately determining the latency of a non-defined URL that the solution encounters.""I have utilized certain characteristics and invested effort in reading the documentation, which proved to be challenging.""Amazon CloudFront's setup is a bit difficult, and we would love it if they made it easier.""The tool must provide regional control."

More Amazon CloudFront Cons →

"The product could be improved by expanding the weightage units of rules.""The area of reporting in the product needs to have a proper format.""We should be able to do proper whitelisting.""In a future release of this solution, I would like to see additional management features to make things simpler.""The user experience, the interface, is lacking. Sometimes it's hard to find certain areas that it has alerted on.""It's a bit difficult to apply the right rules for the right security.""The product should improve the DDoS-related features.""The solution could improve by having better rules, they are very basic at the moment. There are more attacks coming and we have to use third-party solutions, such as FIA. The features are not sufficient to prevent all the attacks, such as DDoS. Overall the solution should be more secure."

More AWS WAF Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Its price is really on the high side. It should be cheaper in general."
  • "Amazon's pricing varies depending on the data transfer."
  • "I rate Amazon CloudFront's pricing a five out of ten."
  • "The product could improve its price."
  • "Amazon CloudFront is an expensive solution."
  • "The solution’s price is reasonable."
  • "Amazon CloudFront costs less than third-party services."
  • "For CloudFront, I'm quite satisfied with the pricing. Initially, it doesn't require many resources for this specific solution."
  • More Amazon CloudFront Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's an annual subscription."
  • "There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
  • "There are different scale options available for WAF."
  • "AWS is not that costly by comparison. They are maybe close to $40 per month. I think it was between $29 or $39."
  • "It has a variable pricing scheme."
  • "We are kind of doing a POC comparison to see what works best. Pricing-wise, AWS is one of the most attractive ones. It is fairly cheap, and we like the pricing part. We're trying to see what makes more sense operation-wise, license-wise, and pricing-wise."
  • "It's quite affordable. It's in the middle."
  • "The pricing should be more affordable, especially as it pertains to small clients."
  • More AWS WAF Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which CDN solutions are best for your needs.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon’s Web Service Global Accelerator or Amazon CloudFront global content delivery network was the better fit for us. We decided to go with… more »
    Top Answer:The AWS environment was very helpful in terms of integration.
    Top Answer:I rate the product’s pricing a six to seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
    Top Answer:Hi Varun I have had experienced with several WAF deployments and deep technical assessments of the following: 1. Imperva WAF 2. F5 WAF 3. Polarisec Cloud WAF Typical limitations on cloud WAF… more »
    Top Answer:Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon’s Web Service Web Application Firewall or Microsoft Azure Application Gateway web application firewall software was the better fit for… more »
    Ranking
    4th
    out of 34 in CDN
    Views
    6,272
    Comparisons
    5,464
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    381
    Rating
    7.9
    Views
    17,782
    Comparisons
    13,844
    Reviews
    30
    Average Words per Review
    407
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    AWS Web Application Firewall
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon CloudFront is a global content delivery network (CDN) service that accelerates delivery of your websites, APIs, video content or other web assets. It integrates with other Amazon Web Services products to give developers and businesses an easy way to accelerate content to end users with no minimum usage commitments. Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including dynamic, static, streaming, and interactive content using a global network of edge locations. Requests for your content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance. Amazon CloudFront is optimized to work with other Amazon Web Services, like Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3), Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2), Amazon Elastic Load Balancing, and Amazon Route 53. Amazon CloudFront also works seamlessly with any non-AWS origin server, which stores the original, definitive versions of your files. Like other Amazon Web Services products, there are no long-term contracts or minimum monthly usage commitments for using Amazon CloudFront – you pay only for as much or as little content as you actually deliver through the content delivery service.

    AWS Web Application Firewall (WAF) is a firewall security system that monitors incoming and outgoing traffic for applications and websites based on your pre-defined web security rules. AWS WAF defends applications and websites from common Web attacks that could otherwise damage application performance and availability and compromise security.

    You can create rules in AWS WAF that can include blocking specific HTTP headers, IP addresses, and URI strings. These rules prevent common web exploits, such as SQL injection or cross-site scripting. Once defined, new rules are deployed within seconds, and can easily be tracked so you can monitor their effectiveness via real-time insights. These saved metrics include URIs, IP addresses, and geo locations for each request.

    AWS WAF Features

    Some of the solution's top features include:

    • Web traffic filtering: Get an extra layer of security by creating a centralized set of rules, easily deployable across multiple websites. These rules filter out web traffic based on conditions like HTTP headers, URIs, and IP addresses. This is very helpful for protection against exploits such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting as well as attacks from third-party applications.
    • Bot control: Malicious bot traffic can consume excessive resources and cause downtime. Gain visibility and control over bot traffic with a managed rule group. You can easily block harmful bots, such as scrapers and crawlers, and you can allow common bots, like search engines and status monitors.
    • Fraud prevention: Effectively defend your application against bot attacks by monitoring your application’s login page with a managed rule group that prevents hackers from accessing user accounts using compromised credentials. The managed rule group helps protect against credential stuffing attacks, brute-force login attempts, and other harmful login activities.
    • API for AWS WAF Management: Automatically create and maintain rules and integrate them into your development process.
    • Metrics for real-time visibility: Receive real-time metrics and captures of raw requests with details about geo-locations, IP addresses, URIs, user agents, and referrers. Integrate seamlessly with Amazon CloudWatch to set up custom alarms when events or attacks occur. These metrics provide valuable data intelligence that can be used to create new rules that significantly improve your application protections.
    • Firewall management: AWS Firewall Manager automatically scans and notifies the security team when there is a policy violation, so they can swiftly take action. When new resources are created, your security team can guarantee that they comply with your organization’s security rules.

    Reviews from Real Users

    AWS WAF stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its user-friendly interface and its integration capabilities.

    Kavin K., a security analyst at M2P Fintech, writes, “I believe the most impressive features are integration and ease of use. The best part of AWS WAF is the cloud-native WAF integration. There aren't any hidden deployments or hidden infrastructure which we have to maintain to have AWS WAF. AWS maintains everything; all we have to do is click the button, and WAF will be activated. Any packet coming through the internet will be filtered through.”

    Sample Customers
    Unilever, Spotify, Pinterest, MLB Advanced Media, Foursquare, PBS, Airbnb, Netflix, WIX, Comcast, Automobili Lamborghini, Rovio, Discovery Communications
    eVitamins, 9Splay, Senao International
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm38%
    Retailer8%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Renewables & Environment Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization20%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Media Company8%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business46%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise28%
    Large Enterprise55%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    CDN
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare, Microsoft, Akamai and others in CDN. Updated: April 2024.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon CloudFront is ranked 4th in CDN with 21 reviews while AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 52 reviews. Amazon CloudFront is rated 8.0, while AWS WAF is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon CloudFront writes "Top-notch in terms of customer service and offers pay-as-you-go model with a free tier". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". Amazon CloudFront is most compared with Azure Front Door, Akamai, Cloudflare, Windows Azure CDN and Fastly, whereas AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Imperva Web Application Firewall, F5 Advanced WAF and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall.

    We monitor all CDN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.