We performed a comparison between Amazon CloudFront and G-Core Labs CDN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two CDN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The support team is knowledgeable."
"The AWS environment was very helpful in terms of integration."
"It is an expensive product with valuable features."
"Feature-wise, I like the solution's signed URL because it provides security for me."
"The product's most valuable feature is its ability to deliver content to users nearby."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the speed of delivery."
"The most valuable feature is the number of servers they can put your content in while being reliable."
"The beneficial feature for the entire AWS community is the presence of edge location servers. These servers are strategically located in multiple locations, allowing efficient content delivery from the nearest server."
"Uptime is always perfect."
"The CDN interface is intuitive and user-friendly, and there are no intrusive ads or upselling additional services. Everything is self-contained, and it's a convenient CDN overall. We also loved that they provided a free trial period. They always seem to do what's best for the consumer and the internet."
"The support is amazing! They solve the issues on the fly."
"Since transitioning to G-Core, our site has started working much faster, and freezes have stopped. Users are staying on the site longer and visiting more sections. We increased the number of customers by 30 percent in the past six months. This is partially attributable to G-Core services."
"I have utilized certain characteristics and invested effort in reading the documentation, which proved to be challenging."
"The tool must provide regional control."
"The user interface could be improved."
"The UI could be more user-friendly."
"The solution can benefit from expanding its data center and server locations to multiple places for smoother content delivery with even lower latency. The latency we experience is sufficient for our needs, and we are doing well. However, if they expand their locations in the future, it could be a positive factor. Its competitors have multiple data and server locations."
"During the setup phase, there were some hiccups in terms of security, the user role, and the permissions."
"With a mixed stack, things become a problem. With GCP and Azure, the DNS setup gets tricky when using CloudFront."
"The lack of seamless integration made the setup process more complex and required additional research to manage all the services properly."
"Once in the past six months, we got a "site is unavailable" error for a maximum of 20 minutes."
"I would like to have one optimized report that we could use for our own needs."
"It would be great if there were a section on the provider's website that shows a set of services for a particular business. It would be helpful to have some kind of checklist of services that are suitable for your blog, which are required, and which can be set up later."
"There are some nuances in the tariff configurations that we found confusing. We would like more flexibility in this area."
Amazon CloudFront is ranked 4th in CDN with 21 reviews while G-Core Labs CDN is ranked 9th in CDN with 4 reviews. Amazon CloudFront is rated 8.0, while G-Core Labs CDN is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Amazon CloudFront writes "Top-notch in terms of customer service and offers pay-as-you-go model with a free tier". On the other hand, the top reviewer of G-Core Labs CDN writes "Works without interruption, scales well, and has perfect uptime". Amazon CloudFront is most compared with Azure Front Door, Akamai, Cloudflare, Windows Azure CDN and KeyCDN, whereas G-Core Labs CDN is most compared with Cloudflare and Cloudflare DNS. See our Amazon CloudFront vs. G-Core Labs CDN report.
See our list of best CDN vendors.
We monitor all CDN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.