Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon Bedrock vs Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 16, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.8
Amazon Bedrock offers cost-efficient usage-based charges but unexpected fees may impact perceived returns despite reduced manual intervention.
Sentiment score
7.6
Customers expect significant cost savings, productivity boosts, and reduced overhead with Nutanix Cloud Clusters, even during the POC phase.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.9
Amazon Bedrock's customer service is highly rated for efficiency and responsiveness, with strong support and documentation quality.
Sentiment score
6.8
Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) support is praised for responsiveness and expertise, though some note occasional slower response times.
So, you always have to bridge the gap by presenting scenarios, getting recommendations, and testing or validating those assumptions.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.1
Amazon Bedrock excels in scalability using AWS, integrating well yet faces limitations like rate and token limits at hyperscale.
Sentiment score
7.7
Nutanix Cloud Clusters offers excellent scalability, supporting large and small setups, though some users faced performance and connectivity challenges.
It scales well with AWS Lambda, AWS Transcribe, and Polly.
Amazon Bedrock is quite highly scalable, but there are some limitations they impose on the accounts, which could be an area for improvement.
It is scalable on a truly global basis.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.6
Amazon Bedrock is reliable and stable, handling workloads seamlessly, maintaining performance, and achieving high user satisfaction ratings.
Sentiment score
7.9
Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is highly stable and reliable, though some users report minor hibernation and on-prem issues.
 

Room For Improvement

Users seek improvements in documentation, integration, pricing, UI, AI capabilities, and introduction of Amazon native models.
Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) requires better adoption, enhanced features, simpler setup, improved support, and reduced costs for greater efficiency.
In AgenTek AI business, the only foundation models we can rely on for scaling now are the Cloud 3.5 models like Haiku and SONNET, designed for low latency and complex AI business use cases.
If AWS provided methods, like five or six prompts that yield specific results, it would ease development.
The user interface of Amazon Bedrock on the management console needs improvements.
 

Setup Cost

Amazon Bedrock offers flexible, consumption-based pricing, cost-effective for experimentation, though enterprise models can be expensive.
Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) pricing ranges from $50K to $250K and is seen as complex and high by users.
Our cost is incredibly low, operating for a few hundred dollars a month in production.
One customer paid around $100 to $200 per month, which was significant given their overall infrastructure costs.
The pricing and licensing of Amazon Bedrock are quite flexible.
 

Valuable Features

Amazon Bedrock offers secure, cost-effective AI model customization and seamless integration, enhancing performance and trust in deployments.
Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) offer robust on-premises features in the cloud, with excellent scalability, stability, ease of use, and support.
It has improved operational costs and efficiency significantly, saving money and enhancing the quality of operations.
Data encryption while in transit and at rest is managed through Bedrock account.
The ability to make changes in the foundational model is valuable since different customers have specific needs, allowing customization.
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Bedrock
Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
13th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
AI Infrastructure (3rd)
Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)
Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
9th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Management (10th), Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms (3rd)
 

Featured Reviews

Charles Powell - PeerSpot reviewer
Very good security features for strengthened data protection
I am not going to speak to their roadmap. Amazon operates Bedrock as an ecosystem supporting third-party models. I am speculating here, but I am sure those third-party models will always be present. However, one must consider that Amazon native models could proliferate Bedrock in the future. We would welcome Amazon native models to Bedrock, since, if they are natively built by Amazon, they are tuned to SageMaker and other Amazon service layers. They have done this somewhat for generative AI, however, in AgenTek AI business, the only foundation models we can rely on for scaling now are the Cloud 3.5 models like Haiku and SONNET, designed for low latency and complex AI business use cases.
Panomporn_Meesangeam - PeerSpot reviewer
Integrated with the personal files and knowledge management processes but is expensive
The customer is a company in Thailand. They use Nutanix Cloud Clusters for file sharing and integrate with personal file share and knowledge management. Our customer attaches a file service with a login and connects with WiFi for cloud content, such as second documents or email access files…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
13%
Transportation Company
9%
Computer Software Company
32%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Bedrock?
The pricing and licensing of Amazon Bedrock are quite flexible.
What needs improvement with Amazon Bedrock?
Currently, I do not have any thoughts about what areas of Amazon Bedrock need improvement.
What is your primary use case for Amazon Bedrock?
I am using Amazon Bedrock ( /products/amazon-bedrock-reviews ) mainly to do some analysis of customer support calls.
What do you like most about Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)?
The overall infrastructure is the most valuable part of Nutanix Cloud Clusters.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)?
It is more than five on a scale of price, considering it quite expensive. It's challenging to regulate the price-quality ratio.
What needs improvement with Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)?
It's more than expensive. Firecaster cannot limit IOP or throughput reading and writing. Quality control needs to regulate the price-quality ratio.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Nutanix Clusters
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
The Home Depot, JetBlue, Hyundai, ShiftLeft
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Bedrock vs. Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.