We performed a comparison between Amazon AWS and Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)."Amazon has a much better understanding of the workflow of data scientists and machine learning processes. This is seen by their SageMaker which offers different versions of the models to be used."
"In general, Amazon's performance is good."
"It is enough for us in terms of features. We don't have too many transactions, and it is sufficient for our current needs."
"Elasticity has always been AWS's mandate. The flexibility of their platform from a systems perspective lives up to its claims."
"Easy to upgrade, easy to expand storage and change your EC2 types."
"It offers durability, high availability, fault tolerance, and a high TCO benefit."
"I like ETL, the EC2 platform, and Route 53. These features are a great complement to the basic infrastructure of any company. The AWS platform has many features, but the fundamental cloud infrastructure is the most important."
"Amazon AWS is easy to use and in the past two years, I've never had any issues with scalability or stability."
"The initial setup is easy."
"You don't need a dedicated IDE to develop. You can work from any browser, which is very convenient. And, with the cloud concept, your code is stored in the cloud, so you can modify it from anywhere, at any time."
"The most valuable feature was the visual drag and drop on the components."
"Not all of the functionality is available in Europe and our customers in France want to be able to use features that are only available in the US."
"The web console of AWS is not so user-friendly."
"The pricing is expensive"
"They could lower the cost. The setup could also be easier."
"They are mainly generalists without access to the operating system. As such, they can provide container level insights,not necessarily at the application level."
"The initial setup is not easy at all."
"Scaling is an area that can be improved."
"Amazon AWS could improve by being more secure and adding more features."
"I would improve the license structure as, for some companies, it may seem a little bit expensive, depending on what they're doing."
"There was an attempt to enable front-end development, it did what it intended to do, but the side effects were too bad."
"The feature called "action chains" could use a bit of enhancement."
More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Amazon AWS is ranked 2nd in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 250 reviews while Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is ranked 28th in Rapid Application Development Software with 3 reviews. Amazon AWS is rated 8.4, while Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon AWS writes "Reliable with good security but is difficult to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service writes "Offers low-code/no-code concept makes development much easier and faster and offers good community support as the development team actively answers questions on the community every day". Amazon AWS is most compared with Linode, OpenShift, Microsoft Azure, SAP Cloud Platform and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), whereas Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Studio Creatio, Microsoft Power Apps, Microsoft Azure and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI).
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.